Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam Oral Solution for Sedative Hypnosis and Anti-anxiety in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Midazolam is recommended by health guidelines for sedation and hypnosis in children. Oral solution is a suitable dosage form for children. But there is no conclusive evidence for sedative-hypnosis and antianxiety effects by midazolam oral solution in children. Methods: Relevant studies w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00225 |
_version_ | 1783510313735290880 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Xiao Chen, Zhe Zhang, Lingli Xu, Peipei Qin, Fang Jiao, Xuefeng Wang, Yiyi Lin, Mao Zeng, Linan Huang, Liang Yu, Dan |
author_facet | Cheng, Xiao Chen, Zhe Zhang, Lingli Xu, Peipei Qin, Fang Jiao, Xuefeng Wang, Yiyi Lin, Mao Zeng, Linan Huang, Liang Yu, Dan |
author_sort | Cheng, Xiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Midazolam is recommended by health guidelines for sedation and hypnosis in children. Oral solution is a suitable dosage form for children. But there is no conclusive evidence for sedative-hypnosis and antianxiety effects by midazolam oral solution in children. Methods: Relevant studies were identified through searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, International Pharmaceuticals, four Chinese electronic databases, and relevant lists. Two reviewers independently selected trials, assessed trial quality, and extracted the data. Results: Eighty-nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing midazolam oral solution with placebo or blank (n = 33), dexmedetomidine (n = 15), ketamine (n = 11), different midazolam doses (n = 10), midazolam injection (n = 8), chloral hydrate (n = 7), diazepam (n = 5), N(2)O (n = 5), triclofos (n = 4), butorphanol (n = 2), fentanyl (n = 2), hydroxyzine (n = 1), and thiopental (n = 1) were identified. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the success rate and duration of sedation and hypnosis between midazolam oral and injectable solution (P > 0.05). The success rate of sedation and hypnosis of midazolam was higher than that of ketamine [risk ratio (RR) = 1.32, 95% CI (1.07, 1.62), I(2) = 0%, P < 0.01]. No significant difference was found in the success rate of sedation and hypnosis, mask acceptance, and parental separation between midazolam oral solution and dexmedetomidine (P > 0.05), and the result of one cohort study was consistent. The results of RCTs and a prospective cohort study showed that the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADR) was 19.57% (189/966). Incidence of adverse reactions between dose groups of (0.25, 0.5] and (0.5, 1.0] mg/kg was similar [Pf (95% CI) = 0.10 (0.04, 0.24) and Pf (95% CI) = 0.09 (0.02, 0.39), respectively], higher than that of the dose group of (0, 0.25] mg/kg [Pf (95% CI) = 0.01 (0.00, 0.19)]. Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that midazolam oral solution is as good as midazolam injection and dexmedetomidine and is better than ketamine. Based on efficacy and safety results, an oral midazolam solution dose of 0.5–1 mg/kg is recommended for children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7093581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70935812020-04-01 Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam Oral Solution for Sedative Hypnosis and Anti-anxiety in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Cheng, Xiao Chen, Zhe Zhang, Lingli Xu, Peipei Qin, Fang Jiao, Xuefeng Wang, Yiyi Lin, Mao Zeng, Linan Huang, Liang Yu, Dan Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Midazolam is recommended by health guidelines for sedation and hypnosis in children. Oral solution is a suitable dosage form for children. But there is no conclusive evidence for sedative-hypnosis and antianxiety effects by midazolam oral solution in children. Methods: Relevant studies were identified through searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, International Pharmaceuticals, four Chinese electronic databases, and relevant lists. Two reviewers independently selected trials, assessed trial quality, and extracted the data. Results: Eighty-nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing midazolam oral solution with placebo or blank (n = 33), dexmedetomidine (n = 15), ketamine (n = 11), different midazolam doses (n = 10), midazolam injection (n = 8), chloral hydrate (n = 7), diazepam (n = 5), N(2)O (n = 5), triclofos (n = 4), butorphanol (n = 2), fentanyl (n = 2), hydroxyzine (n = 1), and thiopental (n = 1) were identified. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the success rate and duration of sedation and hypnosis between midazolam oral and injectable solution (P > 0.05). The success rate of sedation and hypnosis of midazolam was higher than that of ketamine [risk ratio (RR) = 1.32, 95% CI (1.07, 1.62), I(2) = 0%, P < 0.01]. No significant difference was found in the success rate of sedation and hypnosis, mask acceptance, and parental separation between midazolam oral solution and dexmedetomidine (P > 0.05), and the result of one cohort study was consistent. The results of RCTs and a prospective cohort study showed that the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADR) was 19.57% (189/966). Incidence of adverse reactions between dose groups of (0.25, 0.5] and (0.5, 1.0] mg/kg was similar [Pf (95% CI) = 0.10 (0.04, 0.24) and Pf (95% CI) = 0.09 (0.02, 0.39), respectively], higher than that of the dose group of (0, 0.25] mg/kg [Pf (95% CI) = 0.01 (0.00, 0.19)]. Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that midazolam oral solution is as good as midazolam injection and dexmedetomidine and is better than ketamine. Based on efficacy and safety results, an oral midazolam solution dose of 0.5–1 mg/kg is recommended for children. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7093581/ /pubmed/32256348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00225 Text en Copyright © 2020 Cheng, Chen, Zhang, Xu, Qin, Jiao, Wang, Lin, Zeng, Huang and Yu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Cheng, Xiao Chen, Zhe Zhang, Lingli Xu, Peipei Qin, Fang Jiao, Xuefeng Wang, Yiyi Lin, Mao Zeng, Linan Huang, Liang Yu, Dan Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam Oral Solution for Sedative Hypnosis and Anti-anxiety in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam Oral Solution for Sedative Hypnosis and Anti-anxiety in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam Oral Solution for Sedative Hypnosis and Anti-anxiety in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam Oral Solution for Sedative Hypnosis and Anti-anxiety in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam Oral Solution for Sedative Hypnosis and Anti-anxiety in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam Oral Solution for Sedative Hypnosis and Anti-anxiety in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of midazolam oral solution for sedative hypnosis and anti-anxiety in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengxiao efficacyandsafetyofmidazolamoralsolutionforsedativehypnosisandantianxietyinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenzhe efficacyandsafetyofmidazolamoralsolutionforsedativehypnosisandantianxietyinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanglingli efficacyandsafetyofmidazolamoralsolutionforsedativehypnosisandantianxietyinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xupeipei efficacyandsafetyofmidazolamoralsolutionforsedativehypnosisandantianxietyinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qinfang efficacyandsafetyofmidazolamoralsolutionforsedativehypnosisandantianxietyinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiaoxuefeng efficacyandsafetyofmidazolamoralsolutionforsedativehypnosisandantianxietyinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangyiyi efficacyandsafetyofmidazolamoralsolutionforsedativehypnosisandantianxietyinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linmao efficacyandsafetyofmidazolamoralsolutionforsedativehypnosisandantianxietyinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zenglinan efficacyandsafetyofmidazolamoralsolutionforsedativehypnosisandantianxietyinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huangliang efficacyandsafetyofmidazolamoralsolutionforsedativehypnosisandantianxietyinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yudan efficacyandsafetyofmidazolamoralsolutionforsedativehypnosisandantianxietyinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |