Cargando…

Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

BACKGROUND: Making advantageous decisions is essential in everyday life. Our objective was to assess how patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) make decisions under conditions of ambiguity or risk. In addition, the study also aimed to examine the relationship betw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Tingting, Xie, Teng, Wang, Jing, Zhang, Long, Tian, Yanghua, Wang, Kai, Yu, Xin, Wang, Huali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00218
_version_ 1783510315642650624
author Sun, Tingting
Xie, Teng
Wang, Jing
Zhang, Long
Tian, Yanghua
Wang, Kai
Yu, Xin
Wang, Huali
author_facet Sun, Tingting
Xie, Teng
Wang, Jing
Zhang, Long
Tian, Yanghua
Wang, Kai
Yu, Xin
Wang, Huali
author_sort Sun, Tingting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Making advantageous decisions is essential in everyday life. Our objective was to assess how patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) make decisions under conditions of ambiguity or risk. In addition, the study also aimed to examine the relationship between decision-making competence and memory and executive function. METHODS: Patients with MCI (n = 36) and AD (n = 29) and healthy elderly controls (HC, n = 34) were recruited from the memory clinic. All subjects were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery test. We used the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) to measure decision-making under ambiguity and the Game of Dice Task (GDT) to measure decision-making under risk. Pearson’s correlation was used to examine the relationship between the performance of IGT and GDT with delayed recall and the Stroop test. RESULTS: In the GDT, MCI and AD patients presented similar performance but showed different patterns when compared with the HC group. The proportion of those making advantageous choices was lower in the AD group than in the HC group (p = 0.01), while the MCI and HC groups did not differ (p = 0.14). Meanwhile, concerning the ratio of accepting negative feedback, the AD (p < 0.01) group was significantly different from the HC patients, but the MCI (p = 0.06) and HC groups did not differ. In the IGT, MCI and AD patients selected randomly from advantageous and disadvantageous decks (p = 0.94 and p = 0.54), showing no significant change in performance over time. In contrast, the HC group made increasingly frequent advantageous selections over time (p = 0.04). Furthermore, the proportion of advantageous decision-makers for the GDT had a linear relationship with delayed recall of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test and Stroop color words (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that decision-making ability under ambiguity is compromised in MCI and AD, and the decision-making under risk is only impaired in AD. Reduced decision-making performance under risk is closely correlated with lower executive functions and memory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7093589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70935892020-04-01 Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Sun, Tingting Xie, Teng Wang, Jing Zhang, Long Tian, Yanghua Wang, Kai Yu, Xin Wang, Huali Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Making advantageous decisions is essential in everyday life. Our objective was to assess how patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) make decisions under conditions of ambiguity or risk. In addition, the study also aimed to examine the relationship between decision-making competence and memory and executive function. METHODS: Patients with MCI (n = 36) and AD (n = 29) and healthy elderly controls (HC, n = 34) were recruited from the memory clinic. All subjects were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery test. We used the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) to measure decision-making under ambiguity and the Game of Dice Task (GDT) to measure decision-making under risk. Pearson’s correlation was used to examine the relationship between the performance of IGT and GDT with delayed recall and the Stroop test. RESULTS: In the GDT, MCI and AD patients presented similar performance but showed different patterns when compared with the HC group. The proportion of those making advantageous choices was lower in the AD group than in the HC group (p = 0.01), while the MCI and HC groups did not differ (p = 0.14). Meanwhile, concerning the ratio of accepting negative feedback, the AD (p < 0.01) group was significantly different from the HC patients, but the MCI (p = 0.06) and HC groups did not differ. In the IGT, MCI and AD patients selected randomly from advantageous and disadvantageous decks (p = 0.94 and p = 0.54), showing no significant change in performance over time. In contrast, the HC group made increasingly frequent advantageous selections over time (p = 0.04). Furthermore, the proportion of advantageous decision-makers for the GDT had a linear relationship with delayed recall of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test and Stroop color words (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that decision-making ability under ambiguity is compromised in MCI and AD, and the decision-making under risk is only impaired in AD. Reduced decision-making performance under risk is closely correlated with lower executive functions and memory. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7093589/ /pubmed/32256419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00218 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sun, Xie, Wang, Zhang, Tian, Wang, Yu and Wang http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Sun, Tingting
Xie, Teng
Wang, Jing
Zhang, Long
Tian, Yanghua
Wang, Kai
Yu, Xin
Wang, Huali
Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
title Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
title_full Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
title_fullStr Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
title_full_unstemmed Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
title_short Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
title_sort decision-making under ambiguity or risk in individuals with alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00218
work_keys_str_mv AT suntingting decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment
AT xieteng decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment
AT wangjing decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment
AT zhanglong decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment
AT tianyanghua decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment
AT wangkai decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment
AT yuxin decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment
AT wanghuali decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment