Cargando…
Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
BACKGROUND: Making advantageous decisions is essential in everyday life. Our objective was to assess how patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) make decisions under conditions of ambiguity or risk. In addition, the study also aimed to examine the relationship betw...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00218 |
_version_ | 1783510315642650624 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Tingting Xie, Teng Wang, Jing Zhang, Long Tian, Yanghua Wang, Kai Yu, Xin Wang, Huali |
author_facet | Sun, Tingting Xie, Teng Wang, Jing Zhang, Long Tian, Yanghua Wang, Kai Yu, Xin Wang, Huali |
author_sort | Sun, Tingting |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Making advantageous decisions is essential in everyday life. Our objective was to assess how patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) make decisions under conditions of ambiguity or risk. In addition, the study also aimed to examine the relationship between decision-making competence and memory and executive function. METHODS: Patients with MCI (n = 36) and AD (n = 29) and healthy elderly controls (HC, n = 34) were recruited from the memory clinic. All subjects were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery test. We used the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) to measure decision-making under ambiguity and the Game of Dice Task (GDT) to measure decision-making under risk. Pearson’s correlation was used to examine the relationship between the performance of IGT and GDT with delayed recall and the Stroop test. RESULTS: In the GDT, MCI and AD patients presented similar performance but showed different patterns when compared with the HC group. The proportion of those making advantageous choices was lower in the AD group than in the HC group (p = 0.01), while the MCI and HC groups did not differ (p = 0.14). Meanwhile, concerning the ratio of accepting negative feedback, the AD (p < 0.01) group was significantly different from the HC patients, but the MCI (p = 0.06) and HC groups did not differ. In the IGT, MCI and AD patients selected randomly from advantageous and disadvantageous decks (p = 0.94 and p = 0.54), showing no significant change in performance over time. In contrast, the HC group made increasingly frequent advantageous selections over time (p = 0.04). Furthermore, the proportion of advantageous decision-makers for the GDT had a linear relationship with delayed recall of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test and Stroop color words (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that decision-making ability under ambiguity is compromised in MCI and AD, and the decision-making under risk is only impaired in AD. Reduced decision-making performance under risk is closely correlated with lower executive functions and memory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7093589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70935892020-04-01 Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Sun, Tingting Xie, Teng Wang, Jing Zhang, Long Tian, Yanghua Wang, Kai Yu, Xin Wang, Huali Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Making advantageous decisions is essential in everyday life. Our objective was to assess how patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) make decisions under conditions of ambiguity or risk. In addition, the study also aimed to examine the relationship between decision-making competence and memory and executive function. METHODS: Patients with MCI (n = 36) and AD (n = 29) and healthy elderly controls (HC, n = 34) were recruited from the memory clinic. All subjects were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery test. We used the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) to measure decision-making under ambiguity and the Game of Dice Task (GDT) to measure decision-making under risk. Pearson’s correlation was used to examine the relationship between the performance of IGT and GDT with delayed recall and the Stroop test. RESULTS: In the GDT, MCI and AD patients presented similar performance but showed different patterns when compared with the HC group. The proportion of those making advantageous choices was lower in the AD group than in the HC group (p = 0.01), while the MCI and HC groups did not differ (p = 0.14). Meanwhile, concerning the ratio of accepting negative feedback, the AD (p < 0.01) group was significantly different from the HC patients, but the MCI (p = 0.06) and HC groups did not differ. In the IGT, MCI and AD patients selected randomly from advantageous and disadvantageous decks (p = 0.94 and p = 0.54), showing no significant change in performance over time. In contrast, the HC group made increasingly frequent advantageous selections over time (p = 0.04). Furthermore, the proportion of advantageous decision-makers for the GDT had a linear relationship with delayed recall of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test and Stroop color words (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that decision-making ability under ambiguity is compromised in MCI and AD, and the decision-making under risk is only impaired in AD. Reduced decision-making performance under risk is closely correlated with lower executive functions and memory. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7093589/ /pubmed/32256419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00218 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sun, Xie, Wang, Zhang, Tian, Wang, Yu and Wang http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Sun, Tingting Xie, Teng Wang, Jing Zhang, Long Tian, Yanghua Wang, Kai Yu, Xin Wang, Huali Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title | Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title_full | Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title_fullStr | Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title_full_unstemmed | Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title_short | Decision-Making Under Ambiguity or Risk in Individuals With Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title_sort | decision-making under ambiguity or risk in individuals with alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suntingting decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment AT xieteng decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment AT wangjing decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment AT zhanglong decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment AT tianyanghua decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment AT wangkai decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment AT yuxin decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment AT wanghuali decisionmakingunderambiguityorriskinindividualswithalzheimersdiseaseandmildcognitiveimpairment |