Cargando…

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: a review of the introduction of a new surgical technology using the IDEAL framework

BACKGROUND: The IDEAL (Idea, Development, Evaluation, Assessment, Long‐term study) framework is a scheme of investigation for innovative surgical therapeutic interventions. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a procedure based on laparoscopy to deliver intraperitoneal chemoth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tate, S. J., Torkington, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31957257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50257
_version_ 1783510346902798336
author Tate, S. J.
Torkington, J.
author_facet Tate, S. J.
Torkington, J.
author_sort Tate, S. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The IDEAL (Idea, Development, Evaluation, Assessment, Long‐term study) framework is a scheme of investigation for innovative surgical therapeutic interventions. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a procedure based on laparoscopy to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases, introduced in 2011. The aim of this article was to review literature on PIPAC and assess whether development of the technique has followed the IDEAL framework. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE and Embase was carried out to identify scientific reports on PIPAC published between January 2000 and February 2019. The studies were categorized according to the IDEAL stages. RESULTS: Eighty‐six original research papers on PIPAC were identified. There were 23 stage 0, 18 stage 1, 25 stage 2a and six stage 2b studies. Protocol papers for stage 1, 2b and 3 studies, and trial registrations for stage 2a studies, were also identified. The number of centres publishing reports and the number of publications has increased each year. Overall, there has been progression through the IDEAL stages; however, about 60 per cent of clinical reports published in 2018 were stage 1 Idea‐type studies. CONCLUSION: Since its introduction, studies investigating PIPAC have progressed in line with the IDEAL framework. However, the majority of studies reported recently were stage 0 and 1 studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7093779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70937792020-03-26 Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: a review of the introduction of a new surgical technology using the IDEAL framework Tate, S. J. Torkington, J. BJS Open Review BACKGROUND: The IDEAL (Idea, Development, Evaluation, Assessment, Long‐term study) framework is a scheme of investigation for innovative surgical therapeutic interventions. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a procedure based on laparoscopy to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases, introduced in 2011. The aim of this article was to review literature on PIPAC and assess whether development of the technique has followed the IDEAL framework. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE and Embase was carried out to identify scientific reports on PIPAC published between January 2000 and February 2019. The studies were categorized according to the IDEAL stages. RESULTS: Eighty‐six original research papers on PIPAC were identified. There were 23 stage 0, 18 stage 1, 25 stage 2a and six stage 2b studies. Protocol papers for stage 1, 2b and 3 studies, and trial registrations for stage 2a studies, were also identified. The number of centres publishing reports and the number of publications has increased each year. Overall, there has been progression through the IDEAL stages; however, about 60 per cent of clinical reports published in 2018 were stage 1 Idea‐type studies. CONCLUSION: Since its introduction, studies investigating PIPAC have progressed in line with the IDEAL framework. However, the majority of studies reported recently were stage 0 and 1 studies. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7093779/ /pubmed/31957257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50257 Text en © 2020 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Tate, S. J.
Torkington, J.
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: a review of the introduction of a new surgical technology using the IDEAL framework
title Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: a review of the introduction of a new surgical technology using the IDEAL framework
title_full Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: a review of the introduction of a new surgical technology using the IDEAL framework
title_fullStr Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: a review of the introduction of a new surgical technology using the IDEAL framework
title_full_unstemmed Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: a review of the introduction of a new surgical technology using the IDEAL framework
title_short Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: a review of the introduction of a new surgical technology using the IDEAL framework
title_sort pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: a review of the introduction of a new surgical technology using the ideal framework
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31957257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50257
work_keys_str_mv AT tatesj pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapyareviewoftheintroductionofanewsurgicaltechnologyusingtheidealframework
AT torkingtonj pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapyareviewoftheintroductionofanewsurgicaltechnologyusingtheidealframework