Cargando…

Development and Evaluation of the Supportive Needs Assessment Tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC)

BACKGROUND: We report the development and psychometric testing of a Supportive Needs Assessment tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC). METHODS: The 50-item SNAC was administered to patients (n=465) diagnosed with cirrhosis recruited from five metropolitan hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Items were assessed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valery, Patricia C, Bernardes, Christina M, Stuart, Katherine A, Hartel, Gunter F, McPhail, Steven M, Skoien, Richard, Rahman, Tony, Clark, Paul J, Horsfall, Leigh U, Hayward, Kelly L, Gupta, Rohit, Powell, Elizabeth E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256051
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S236818
_version_ 1783510408750956544
author Valery, Patricia C
Bernardes, Christina M
Stuart, Katherine A
Hartel, Gunter F
McPhail, Steven M
Skoien, Richard
Rahman, Tony
Clark, Paul J
Horsfall, Leigh U
Hayward, Kelly L
Gupta, Rohit
Powell, Elizabeth E
author_facet Valery, Patricia C
Bernardes, Christina M
Stuart, Katherine A
Hartel, Gunter F
McPhail, Steven M
Skoien, Richard
Rahman, Tony
Clark, Paul J
Horsfall, Leigh U
Hayward, Kelly L
Gupta, Rohit
Powell, Elizabeth E
author_sort Valery, Patricia C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We report the development and psychometric testing of a Supportive Needs Assessment tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC). METHODS: The 50-item SNAC was administered to patients (n=465) diagnosed with cirrhosis recruited from five metropolitan hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Items were assessed for ceiling and floor effects, and exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure. Identified factors were assessed for internal consistency and convergent validity to validated psychosocial tools. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 factors (39 items), which together accounted for 49.2% of the total variance. The 39-item SNAC met the requirements of a needs assessment tool and identified a range of needs important to patients with cirrhosis that were grouped in four subscales: “Psychosocial issues”, “Practical and physical needs”, “Information needs”, and “Lifestyle changes”. Cronbach's alpha values for the four subscales ranged from 0.64 to 0.92. Convergent validity was supported by a strong correlation between the total SNAC score and that of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ; Spearman rho −0.68; p<0.001), and moderate correlations with the Distress Thermometer (Spearman rho 0.53; p<0.001) and seven subscales of a generic health-related quality of life instrument (Short Form 36; Spearman rho ranged from −0.48 to −0.57; p<0.001). The SNAC discriminated patient groups with respect to sex (p=0.013), age group (p<0.001), and hospital admission status (admitted vs not; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: These data provide initial evidence for the validity and reliability of the SNAC, an instrument designed to measure type and amount of perceived unmet practical and psychological needs of people diagnosed with cirrhosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7094148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70941482020-04-01 Development and Evaluation of the Supportive Needs Assessment Tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC) Valery, Patricia C Bernardes, Christina M Stuart, Katherine A Hartel, Gunter F McPhail, Steven M Skoien, Richard Rahman, Tony Clark, Paul J Horsfall, Leigh U Hayward, Kelly L Gupta, Rohit Powell, Elizabeth E Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: We report the development and psychometric testing of a Supportive Needs Assessment tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC). METHODS: The 50-item SNAC was administered to patients (n=465) diagnosed with cirrhosis recruited from five metropolitan hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Items were assessed for ceiling and floor effects, and exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure. Identified factors were assessed for internal consistency and convergent validity to validated psychosocial tools. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 factors (39 items), which together accounted for 49.2% of the total variance. The 39-item SNAC met the requirements of a needs assessment tool and identified a range of needs important to patients with cirrhosis that were grouped in four subscales: “Psychosocial issues”, “Practical and physical needs”, “Information needs”, and “Lifestyle changes”. Cronbach's alpha values for the four subscales ranged from 0.64 to 0.92. Convergent validity was supported by a strong correlation between the total SNAC score and that of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ; Spearman rho −0.68; p<0.001), and moderate correlations with the Distress Thermometer (Spearman rho 0.53; p<0.001) and seven subscales of a generic health-related quality of life instrument (Short Form 36; Spearman rho ranged from −0.48 to −0.57; p<0.001). The SNAC discriminated patient groups with respect to sex (p=0.013), age group (p<0.001), and hospital admission status (admitted vs not; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: These data provide initial evidence for the validity and reliability of the SNAC, an instrument designed to measure type and amount of perceived unmet practical and psychological needs of people diagnosed with cirrhosis. Dove 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7094148/ /pubmed/32256051 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S236818 Text en © 2020 Valery et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Valery, Patricia C
Bernardes, Christina M
Stuart, Katherine A
Hartel, Gunter F
McPhail, Steven M
Skoien, Richard
Rahman, Tony
Clark, Paul J
Horsfall, Leigh U
Hayward, Kelly L
Gupta, Rohit
Powell, Elizabeth E
Development and Evaluation of the Supportive Needs Assessment Tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC)
title Development and Evaluation of the Supportive Needs Assessment Tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC)
title_full Development and Evaluation of the Supportive Needs Assessment Tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC)
title_fullStr Development and Evaluation of the Supportive Needs Assessment Tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC)
title_full_unstemmed Development and Evaluation of the Supportive Needs Assessment Tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC)
title_short Development and Evaluation of the Supportive Needs Assessment Tool for Cirrhosis (SNAC)
title_sort development and evaluation of the supportive needs assessment tool for cirrhosis (snac)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256051
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S236818
work_keys_str_mv AT valerypatriciac developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac
AT bernardeschristinam developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac
AT stuartkatherinea developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac
AT hartelgunterf developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac
AT mcphailstevenm developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac
AT skoienrichard developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac
AT rahmantony developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac
AT clarkpaulj developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac
AT horsfallleighu developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac
AT haywardkellyl developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac
AT guptarohit developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac
AT powellelizabethe developmentandevaluationofthesupportiveneedsassessmenttoolforcirrhosissnac