Cargando…

Quantitative comparison of the efficiency of antibodies against S1 and S2 subunit of SARS coronavirus spike protein in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding: Implications for the functional roles of S2 subunit

Neutralizing effects of antibodies targeting the C‐terminal stalk (S2) subunit of the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus have previously been reported, although its mechanism remained elusive. In this study, high titered mouse antisera against the N‐terminal globular (S1)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Fanya, Hon, Chung Chau, Yip, Chi Wai, Law, Ka Man, Yeung, Yin Shan, Chan, Kwok Hung, Malik Peiris, Joseph S., Leung, Frederick Chi Ching
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16989815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.08.085
_version_ 1783510495588777984
author Zeng, Fanya
Hon, Chung Chau
Yip, Chi Wai
Law, Ka Man
Yeung, Yin Shan
Chan, Kwok Hung
Malik Peiris, Joseph S.
Leung, Frederick Chi Ching
author_facet Zeng, Fanya
Hon, Chung Chau
Yip, Chi Wai
Law, Ka Man
Yeung, Yin Shan
Chan, Kwok Hung
Malik Peiris, Joseph S.
Leung, Frederick Chi Ching
author_sort Zeng, Fanya
collection PubMed
description Neutralizing effects of antibodies targeting the C‐terminal stalk (S2) subunit of the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus have previously been reported, although its mechanism remained elusive. In this study, high titered mouse antisera against the N‐terminal globular (S1) and S2 subunits of the S protein were generated and total immunoglobulin G (IgG) was purified from these antisera. The efficiency of these purified IgGs in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding were compared quantitatively using virus neutralization assay and a previously developed cell‐based receptor binding assay, respectively. We demonstrated that anti‐S1 IgG neutralizes the virus and binds to the membrane associated S protein more efficiently than anti‐S2 IgG does. Moreover, both anti‐S1 and anti‐S2 IgGs were able to abolish the binding between S protein and its cellular receptor(s), although anti‐S1 IgG showed a significantly higher blocking efficiency. The unexpected blocking ability of anti‐S2 IgG towards the receptor binding implied a possible role of the S2 subunit in virus docking process and argues against the current hypothesis of viral entry. On the other hand, the functional roles of the previously reported neutralizing epitopes within S2 subunit were investigated using an antigen specific antibody depletion assay. Depletion of antibodies against these regions significantly diminished, though not completely abolished, the neutralizing effects of anti‐S2 IgG. It suggests the absence of a major neutralizing domain on S2 protein. The possible ways of anti‐S2 IgGs to abolish the receptor binding and the factors restricting anti‐S2 IgGs to neutralize the virus are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7094555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70945552020-03-25 Quantitative comparison of the efficiency of antibodies against S1 and S2 subunit of SARS coronavirus spike protein in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding: Implications for the functional roles of S2 subunit Zeng, Fanya Hon, Chung Chau Yip, Chi Wai Law, Ka Man Yeung, Yin Shan Chan, Kwok Hung Malik Peiris, Joseph S. Leung, Frederick Chi Ching FEBS Lett Short Communications Neutralizing effects of antibodies targeting the C‐terminal stalk (S2) subunit of the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus have previously been reported, although its mechanism remained elusive. In this study, high titered mouse antisera against the N‐terminal globular (S1) and S2 subunits of the S protein were generated and total immunoglobulin G (IgG) was purified from these antisera. The efficiency of these purified IgGs in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding were compared quantitatively using virus neutralization assay and a previously developed cell‐based receptor binding assay, respectively. We demonstrated that anti‐S1 IgG neutralizes the virus and binds to the membrane associated S protein more efficiently than anti‐S2 IgG does. Moreover, both anti‐S1 and anti‐S2 IgGs were able to abolish the binding between S protein and its cellular receptor(s), although anti‐S1 IgG showed a significantly higher blocking efficiency. The unexpected blocking ability of anti‐S2 IgG towards the receptor binding implied a possible role of the S2 subunit in virus docking process and argues against the current hypothesis of viral entry. On the other hand, the functional roles of the previously reported neutralizing epitopes within S2 subunit were investigated using an antigen specific antibody depletion assay. Depletion of antibodies against these regions significantly diminished, though not completely abolished, the neutralizing effects of anti‐S2 IgG. It suggests the absence of a major neutralizing domain on S2 protein. The possible ways of anti‐S2 IgGs to abolish the receptor binding and the factors restricting anti‐S2 IgGs to neutralize the virus are discussed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2006-10-16 2006-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7094555/ /pubmed/16989815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.08.085 Text en FEBS Letters 580 (2006) 1873-3468 © 2015 Federation of European Biochemical Societies This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.
spellingShingle Short Communications
Zeng, Fanya
Hon, Chung Chau
Yip, Chi Wai
Law, Ka Man
Yeung, Yin Shan
Chan, Kwok Hung
Malik Peiris, Joseph S.
Leung, Frederick Chi Ching
Quantitative comparison of the efficiency of antibodies against S1 and S2 subunit of SARS coronavirus spike protein in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding: Implications for the functional roles of S2 subunit
title Quantitative comparison of the efficiency of antibodies against S1 and S2 subunit of SARS coronavirus spike protein in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding: Implications for the functional roles of S2 subunit
title_full Quantitative comparison of the efficiency of antibodies against S1 and S2 subunit of SARS coronavirus spike protein in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding: Implications for the functional roles of S2 subunit
title_fullStr Quantitative comparison of the efficiency of antibodies against S1 and S2 subunit of SARS coronavirus spike protein in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding: Implications for the functional roles of S2 subunit
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative comparison of the efficiency of antibodies against S1 and S2 subunit of SARS coronavirus spike protein in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding: Implications for the functional roles of S2 subunit
title_short Quantitative comparison of the efficiency of antibodies against S1 and S2 subunit of SARS coronavirus spike protein in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding: Implications for the functional roles of S2 subunit
title_sort quantitative comparison of the efficiency of antibodies against s1 and s2 subunit of sars coronavirus spike protein in virus neutralization and blocking of receptor binding: implications for the functional roles of s2 subunit
topic Short Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16989815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.08.085
work_keys_str_mv AT zengfanya quantitativecomparisonoftheefficiencyofantibodiesagainsts1ands2subunitofsarscoronavirusspikeproteininvirusneutralizationandblockingofreceptorbindingimplicationsforthefunctionalrolesofs2subunit
AT honchungchau quantitativecomparisonoftheefficiencyofantibodiesagainsts1ands2subunitofsarscoronavirusspikeproteininvirusneutralizationandblockingofreceptorbindingimplicationsforthefunctionalrolesofs2subunit
AT yipchiwai quantitativecomparisonoftheefficiencyofantibodiesagainsts1ands2subunitofsarscoronavirusspikeproteininvirusneutralizationandblockingofreceptorbindingimplicationsforthefunctionalrolesofs2subunit
AT lawkaman quantitativecomparisonoftheefficiencyofantibodiesagainsts1ands2subunitofsarscoronavirusspikeproteininvirusneutralizationandblockingofreceptorbindingimplicationsforthefunctionalrolesofs2subunit
AT yeungyinshan quantitativecomparisonoftheefficiencyofantibodiesagainsts1ands2subunitofsarscoronavirusspikeproteininvirusneutralizationandblockingofreceptorbindingimplicationsforthefunctionalrolesofs2subunit
AT chankwokhung quantitativecomparisonoftheefficiencyofantibodiesagainsts1ands2subunitofsarscoronavirusspikeproteininvirusneutralizationandblockingofreceptorbindingimplicationsforthefunctionalrolesofs2subunit
AT malikpeirisjosephs quantitativecomparisonoftheefficiencyofantibodiesagainsts1ands2subunitofsarscoronavirusspikeproteininvirusneutralizationandblockingofreceptorbindingimplicationsforthefunctionalrolesofs2subunit
AT leungfrederickchiching quantitativecomparisonoftheefficiencyofantibodiesagainsts1ands2subunitofsarscoronavirusspikeproteininvirusneutralizationandblockingofreceptorbindingimplicationsforthefunctionalrolesofs2subunit