Cargando…

Using Artificial Intelligence in Infection Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Artificial intelligence (AI) offers huge potential in infection prevention and control (IPC). We explore its potential IPC benefits in epidemiology, laboratory infection diagnosis, and hand hygiene. RECENT FINDINGS: AI has the potential to detect transmission events during outbrea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fitzpatrick, Fidelma, Doherty, Aaron, Lacey, Gerard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7095094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40506-020-00216-7
_version_ 1783510596779507712
author Fitzpatrick, Fidelma
Doherty, Aaron
Lacey, Gerard
author_facet Fitzpatrick, Fidelma
Doherty, Aaron
Lacey, Gerard
author_sort Fitzpatrick, Fidelma
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Artificial intelligence (AI) offers huge potential in infection prevention and control (IPC). We explore its potential IPC benefits in epidemiology, laboratory infection diagnosis, and hand hygiene. RECENT FINDINGS: AI has the potential to detect transmission events during outbreaks or predict high-risk patients, enabling development of tailored IPC interventions. AI offers opportunities to enhance diagnostics with objective pattern recognition, standardize the diagnosis of infections with IPC implications, and facilitate the dissemination of IPC expertise. AI hand hygiene applications can deliver behavior change, though it requires further evaluation in different clinical settings. However, staff can become dependent on automatic reminders, and performance returns to baseline if feedback is removed. SUMMARY: Advantages for IPC include speed, consistency, and capability of handling infinitely large datasets. However, many challenges remain; improving the availability of high-quality representative datasets and consideration of biases within preexisting databases are important challenges for future developments. AI in itself will not improve IPC; this requires culture and behavior change. Most studies to date assess performance retrospectively so there is a need for prospective evaluation in the real-life, often chaotic, clinical setting. Close collaboration with IPC experts to interpret outputs and ensure clinical relevance is essential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7095094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70950942020-03-26 Using Artificial Intelligence in Infection Prevention Fitzpatrick, Fidelma Doherty, Aaron Lacey, Gerard Curr Treat Options Infect Dis New Technologies and Advances in Infections Prevention (A Marra, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Artificial intelligence (AI) offers huge potential in infection prevention and control (IPC). We explore its potential IPC benefits in epidemiology, laboratory infection diagnosis, and hand hygiene. RECENT FINDINGS: AI has the potential to detect transmission events during outbreaks or predict high-risk patients, enabling development of tailored IPC interventions. AI offers opportunities to enhance diagnostics with objective pattern recognition, standardize the diagnosis of infections with IPC implications, and facilitate the dissemination of IPC expertise. AI hand hygiene applications can deliver behavior change, though it requires further evaluation in different clinical settings. However, staff can become dependent on automatic reminders, and performance returns to baseline if feedback is removed. SUMMARY: Advantages for IPC include speed, consistency, and capability of handling infinitely large datasets. However, many challenges remain; improving the availability of high-quality representative datasets and consideration of biases within preexisting databases are important challenges for future developments. AI in itself will not improve IPC; this requires culture and behavior change. Most studies to date assess performance retrospectively so there is a need for prospective evaluation in the real-life, often chaotic, clinical setting. Close collaboration with IPC experts to interpret outputs and ensure clinical relevance is essential. Springer US 2020-03-19 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7095094/ /pubmed/32218708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40506-020-00216-7 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle New Technologies and Advances in Infections Prevention (A Marra, Section Editor)
Fitzpatrick, Fidelma
Doherty, Aaron
Lacey, Gerard
Using Artificial Intelligence in Infection Prevention
title Using Artificial Intelligence in Infection Prevention
title_full Using Artificial Intelligence in Infection Prevention
title_fullStr Using Artificial Intelligence in Infection Prevention
title_full_unstemmed Using Artificial Intelligence in Infection Prevention
title_short Using Artificial Intelligence in Infection Prevention
title_sort using artificial intelligence in infection prevention
topic New Technologies and Advances in Infections Prevention (A Marra, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7095094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40506-020-00216-7
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzpatrickfidelma usingartificialintelligenceininfectionprevention
AT dohertyaaron usingartificialintelligenceininfectionprevention
AT laceygerard usingartificialintelligenceininfectionprevention