Cargando…
The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?
Objective Traditionally, laminectomy has been the preferred surgical approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors. Recent trends towards minimally invasive techniques have generated interest in hemilaminectomy as an effective alternative surgical approach to resect spinal tumors. However,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7096001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226685 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7084 |
_version_ | 1783510730592485376 |
---|---|
author | Goodarzi, Amir Clouse, Jared Capizzano, Tatiana Kim, Kee D Panchal, Ripul |
author_facet | Goodarzi, Amir Clouse, Jared Capizzano, Tatiana Kim, Kee D Panchal, Ripul |
author_sort | Goodarzi, Amir |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective Traditionally, laminectomy has been the preferred surgical approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors. Recent trends towards minimally invasive techniques have generated interest in hemilaminectomy as an effective alternative surgical approach to resect spinal tumors. However, it remains unclear if the potential benefits of hemilaminectomies, used in other routine spinal procedures, apply to intradural spinal tumors. This report presents a six-year single institutional analysis of open resection of intradural tumors using laminectomies as compared to hemilaminectomies. Methods A single institution, multisurgeon, retrospective review of 52 patients undergoing resection of intradural spinal tumors over a six-year period was performed. Estimated blood loss, operative time, post-operative complications, length of stay, and post-operative clinical spinal instability were analyzed and compared between the two surgical techniques. Results The mean follow-up was 34 and 20 months for the laminectomy and hemilaminectomy groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in operative times between the two groups (hemilaminectomy: 250.13±76.44 minutes, laminectomy: 244.49±92.85 minutes; p=0.43). Similarly, there was no difference in overall estimated blood loss (hemilaminectomy: 125±74 cc, laminectomy: 256.05±320.8 cc; p=0.27) or mean hospital length of stay (hemilaminectomy: 4.00±2.12 days, laminectomy: 5.26±3.0 days; p=0.60). No patient in either surgical group had post-operative evidence of clinical spinal instability. Conclusion Hemilaminectomy is a viable approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors, with similar rates of post-operative complications to laminectomy when using an open surgical approach. The laminectomy allows for bilateral exposure of the entire spinal canal and neural foramina; and continues to be the preferred method for resection of large tumors with complex morphology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7096001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70960012020-03-28 The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy? Goodarzi, Amir Clouse, Jared Capizzano, Tatiana Kim, Kee D Panchal, Ripul Cureus Neurosurgery Objective Traditionally, laminectomy has been the preferred surgical approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors. Recent trends towards minimally invasive techniques have generated interest in hemilaminectomy as an effective alternative surgical approach to resect spinal tumors. However, it remains unclear if the potential benefits of hemilaminectomies, used in other routine spinal procedures, apply to intradural spinal tumors. This report presents a six-year single institutional analysis of open resection of intradural tumors using laminectomies as compared to hemilaminectomies. Methods A single institution, multisurgeon, retrospective review of 52 patients undergoing resection of intradural spinal tumors over a six-year period was performed. Estimated blood loss, operative time, post-operative complications, length of stay, and post-operative clinical spinal instability were analyzed and compared between the two surgical techniques. Results The mean follow-up was 34 and 20 months for the laminectomy and hemilaminectomy groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in operative times between the two groups (hemilaminectomy: 250.13±76.44 minutes, laminectomy: 244.49±92.85 minutes; p=0.43). Similarly, there was no difference in overall estimated blood loss (hemilaminectomy: 125±74 cc, laminectomy: 256.05±320.8 cc; p=0.27) or mean hospital length of stay (hemilaminectomy: 4.00±2.12 days, laminectomy: 5.26±3.0 days; p=0.60). No patient in either surgical group had post-operative evidence of clinical spinal instability. Conclusion Hemilaminectomy is a viable approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors, with similar rates of post-operative complications to laminectomy when using an open surgical approach. The laminectomy allows for bilateral exposure of the entire spinal canal and neural foramina; and continues to be the preferred method for resection of large tumors with complex morphology. Cureus 2020-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7096001/ /pubmed/32226685 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7084 Text en Copyright © 2020, Goodarzi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neurosurgery Goodarzi, Amir Clouse, Jared Capizzano, Tatiana Kim, Kee D Panchal, Ripul The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy? |
title | The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy? |
title_full | The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy? |
title_fullStr | The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy? |
title_short | The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy? |
title_sort | optimal surgical approach to intradural spinal tumors: laminectomy or hemilaminectomy? |
topic | Neurosurgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7096001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226685 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goodarziamir theoptimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy AT clousejared theoptimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy AT capizzanotatiana theoptimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy AT kimkeed theoptimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy AT panchalripul theoptimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy AT goodarziamir optimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy AT clousejared optimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy AT capizzanotatiana optimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy AT kimkeed optimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy AT panchalripul optimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy |