Cargando…

The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?

Objective Traditionally, laminectomy has been the preferred surgical approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors. Recent trends towards minimally invasive techniques have generated interest in hemilaminectomy as an effective alternative surgical approach to resect spinal tumors. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodarzi, Amir, Clouse, Jared, Capizzano, Tatiana, Kim, Kee D, Panchal, Ripul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7096001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226685
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7084
_version_ 1783510730592485376
author Goodarzi, Amir
Clouse, Jared
Capizzano, Tatiana
Kim, Kee D
Panchal, Ripul
author_facet Goodarzi, Amir
Clouse, Jared
Capizzano, Tatiana
Kim, Kee D
Panchal, Ripul
author_sort Goodarzi, Amir
collection PubMed
description Objective Traditionally, laminectomy has been the preferred surgical approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors. Recent trends towards minimally invasive techniques have generated interest in hemilaminectomy as an effective alternative surgical approach to resect spinal tumors. However, it remains unclear if the potential benefits of hemilaminectomies, used in other routine spinal procedures, apply to intradural spinal tumors. This report presents a six-year single institutional analysis of open resection of intradural tumors using laminectomies as compared to hemilaminectomies. Methods A single institution, multisurgeon, retrospective review of 52 patients undergoing resection of intradural spinal tumors over a six-year period was performed. Estimated blood loss, operative time, post-operative complications, length of stay, and post-operative clinical spinal instability were analyzed and compared between the two surgical techniques. Results The mean follow-up was 34 and 20 months for the laminectomy and hemilaminectomy groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in operative times between the two groups (hemilaminectomy: 250.13±76.44 minutes, laminectomy: 244.49±92.85 minutes; p=0.43). Similarly, there was no difference in overall estimated blood loss (hemilaminectomy: 125±74 cc, laminectomy: 256.05±320.8 cc; p=0.27) or mean hospital length of stay (hemilaminectomy: 4.00±2.12 days, laminectomy: 5.26±3.0 days; p=0.60). No patient in either surgical group had post-operative evidence of clinical spinal instability. Conclusion Hemilaminectomy is a viable approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors, with similar rates of post-operative complications to laminectomy when using an open surgical approach. The laminectomy allows for bilateral exposure of the entire spinal canal and neural foramina; and continues to be the preferred method for resection of large tumors with complex morphology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7096001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70960012020-03-28 The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy? Goodarzi, Amir Clouse, Jared Capizzano, Tatiana Kim, Kee D Panchal, Ripul Cureus Neurosurgery Objective Traditionally, laminectomy has been the preferred surgical approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors. Recent trends towards minimally invasive techniques have generated interest in hemilaminectomy as an effective alternative surgical approach to resect spinal tumors. However, it remains unclear if the potential benefits of hemilaminectomies, used in other routine spinal procedures, apply to intradural spinal tumors. This report presents a six-year single institutional analysis of open resection of intradural tumors using laminectomies as compared to hemilaminectomies. Methods A single institution, multisurgeon, retrospective review of 52 patients undergoing resection of intradural spinal tumors over a six-year period was performed. Estimated blood loss, operative time, post-operative complications, length of stay, and post-operative clinical spinal instability were analyzed and compared between the two surgical techniques. Results The mean follow-up was 34 and 20 months for the laminectomy and hemilaminectomy groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in operative times between the two groups (hemilaminectomy: 250.13±76.44 minutes, laminectomy: 244.49±92.85 minutes; p=0.43). Similarly, there was no difference in overall estimated blood loss (hemilaminectomy: 125±74 cc, laminectomy: 256.05±320.8 cc; p=0.27) or mean hospital length of stay (hemilaminectomy: 4.00±2.12 days, laminectomy: 5.26±3.0 days; p=0.60). No patient in either surgical group had post-operative evidence of clinical spinal instability. Conclusion Hemilaminectomy is a viable approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors, with similar rates of post-operative complications to laminectomy when using an open surgical approach. The laminectomy allows for bilateral exposure of the entire spinal canal and neural foramina; and continues to be the preferred method for resection of large tumors with complex morphology. Cureus 2020-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7096001/ /pubmed/32226685 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7084 Text en Copyright © 2020, Goodarzi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurosurgery
Goodarzi, Amir
Clouse, Jared
Capizzano, Tatiana
Kim, Kee D
Panchal, Ripul
The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?
title The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?
title_full The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?
title_fullStr The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?
title_full_unstemmed The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?
title_short The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?
title_sort optimal surgical approach to intradural spinal tumors: laminectomy or hemilaminectomy?
topic Neurosurgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7096001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226685
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7084
work_keys_str_mv AT goodarziamir theoptimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy
AT clousejared theoptimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy
AT capizzanotatiana theoptimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy
AT kimkeed theoptimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy
AT panchalripul theoptimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy
AT goodarziamir optimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy
AT clousejared optimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy
AT capizzanotatiana optimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy
AT kimkeed optimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy
AT panchalripul optimalsurgicalapproachtointraduralspinaltumorslaminectomyorhemilaminectomy