Cargando…

Biotic and Abiotic Contribution to Diurnal Soil CO(2) Fluxes from Saline/Alkaline Soils

As the second largest carbon flux in terrestrial ecosystems, the soil CO(2) flux is closely related to the atmospheric CO(2) concentration. The soil CO(2) flux is the sum of biotic respiration and abiotic geochemical CO(2) exchange; however, little is known about abiotic CO(2) fluxes in arid areas....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhong-Yuan, Xie, Jiang-Bo, Wang, Yu-Gang, Li, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7096481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62209-2
_version_ 1783510813752950784
author Wang, Zhong-Yuan
Xie, Jiang-Bo
Wang, Yu-Gang
Li, Yan
author_facet Wang, Zhong-Yuan
Xie, Jiang-Bo
Wang, Yu-Gang
Li, Yan
author_sort Wang, Zhong-Yuan
collection PubMed
description As the second largest carbon flux in terrestrial ecosystems, the soil CO(2) flux is closely related to the atmospheric CO(2) concentration. The soil CO(2) flux is the sum of biotic respiration and abiotic geochemical CO(2) exchange; however, little is known about abiotic CO(2) fluxes in arid areas. To investigate the relative contribution of abiotic and biotic soil CO(2) fluxes over a diurnal course, the abiotic CO(2) flux was distinguished by autoclaving sterilization in both saline and alkaline soils at an arid site in northwestern China. The results demonstrated that: (1) Over the diurnal course, the abiotic CO(2) was a significant component of the soil CO(2) flux in both saline and alkaline soil, which accounted for more than 56% of the diurnal soil CO(2) flux. (2) There was a dramatic difference in the temperature response between biotic and abiotic CO(2) fluxes: the response curves of biotic respiration were exponential in the saline soil and quadratic in the alkaline soil, while the abiotic CO(2) flux was linearly correlated with soil temperature. They were of similar magnitude but with opposite signs: resulting in almost neutral carbon emissions on daily average. (3) Due to this covering up effect of the abiotic CO(2) flux, biotic respiration was severely underestimated (directly measured soil CO(2) flux was only one-seventh of the biotic CO(2) flux in saline soil, and even an order of magnitude lower in alkaline soil). In addition, the soil CO(2) flux masked the temperature-inhibition of biotic respiration in the alkaline soil, and veiled the differences in soil biological respiration between the saline and alkaline soils. Hence, the soil CO(2) flux may not be an ideal representative of soil respiration in arid soil. Our study calls for a reappraisal of the definition of the soil CO(2) flux and its temperature dependence in arid or saline/alkaline land. Further investigations of abiotic CO(2) fluxes are needed to improve our understanding of arid land responses to global warming and to assist in identifying the underlying abiotic mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7096481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70964812020-03-30 Biotic and Abiotic Contribution to Diurnal Soil CO(2) Fluxes from Saline/Alkaline Soils Wang, Zhong-Yuan Xie, Jiang-Bo Wang, Yu-Gang Li, Yan Sci Rep Article As the second largest carbon flux in terrestrial ecosystems, the soil CO(2) flux is closely related to the atmospheric CO(2) concentration. The soil CO(2) flux is the sum of biotic respiration and abiotic geochemical CO(2) exchange; however, little is known about abiotic CO(2) fluxes in arid areas. To investigate the relative contribution of abiotic and biotic soil CO(2) fluxes over a diurnal course, the abiotic CO(2) flux was distinguished by autoclaving sterilization in both saline and alkaline soils at an arid site in northwestern China. The results demonstrated that: (1) Over the diurnal course, the abiotic CO(2) was a significant component of the soil CO(2) flux in both saline and alkaline soil, which accounted for more than 56% of the diurnal soil CO(2) flux. (2) There was a dramatic difference in the temperature response between biotic and abiotic CO(2) fluxes: the response curves of biotic respiration were exponential in the saline soil and quadratic in the alkaline soil, while the abiotic CO(2) flux was linearly correlated with soil temperature. They were of similar magnitude but with opposite signs: resulting in almost neutral carbon emissions on daily average. (3) Due to this covering up effect of the abiotic CO(2) flux, biotic respiration was severely underestimated (directly measured soil CO(2) flux was only one-seventh of the biotic CO(2) flux in saline soil, and even an order of magnitude lower in alkaline soil). In addition, the soil CO(2) flux masked the temperature-inhibition of biotic respiration in the alkaline soil, and veiled the differences in soil biological respiration between the saline and alkaline soils. Hence, the soil CO(2) flux may not be an ideal representative of soil respiration in arid soil. Our study calls for a reappraisal of the definition of the soil CO(2) flux and its temperature dependence in arid or saline/alkaline land. Further investigations of abiotic CO(2) fluxes are needed to improve our understanding of arid land responses to global warming and to assist in identifying the underlying abiotic mechanisms. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7096481/ /pubmed/32214162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62209-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Zhong-Yuan
Xie, Jiang-Bo
Wang, Yu-Gang
Li, Yan
Biotic and Abiotic Contribution to Diurnal Soil CO(2) Fluxes from Saline/Alkaline Soils
title Biotic and Abiotic Contribution to Diurnal Soil CO(2) Fluxes from Saline/Alkaline Soils
title_full Biotic and Abiotic Contribution to Diurnal Soil CO(2) Fluxes from Saline/Alkaline Soils
title_fullStr Biotic and Abiotic Contribution to Diurnal Soil CO(2) Fluxes from Saline/Alkaline Soils
title_full_unstemmed Biotic and Abiotic Contribution to Diurnal Soil CO(2) Fluxes from Saline/Alkaline Soils
title_short Biotic and Abiotic Contribution to Diurnal Soil CO(2) Fluxes from Saline/Alkaline Soils
title_sort biotic and abiotic contribution to diurnal soil co(2) fluxes from saline/alkaline soils
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7096481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62209-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhongyuan bioticandabioticcontributiontodiurnalsoilco2fluxesfromsalinealkalinesoils
AT xiejiangbo bioticandabioticcontributiontodiurnalsoilco2fluxesfromsalinealkalinesoils
AT wangyugang bioticandabioticcontributiontodiurnalsoilco2fluxesfromsalinealkalinesoils
AT liyan bioticandabioticcontributiontodiurnalsoilco2fluxesfromsalinealkalinesoils