Cargando…

Managing mental health: why we need to redress the balance between healthcare spending and social spending

BACKGROUND: Mental health outcomes vary widely among high-income countries, although mental health problems represent an increasing proportion of the burden of disease for all countries. This has led to increased demand for healthcare services, but mental health outcomes may also be particularly sen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Daniel S., Han, Jing, Torabi, Mahmoud, Forget, Evelyn L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7098116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32216782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08491-1
_version_ 1783511126694166528
author Park, Daniel S.
Han, Jing
Torabi, Mahmoud
Forget, Evelyn L.
author_facet Park, Daniel S.
Han, Jing
Torabi, Mahmoud
Forget, Evelyn L.
author_sort Park, Daniel S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mental health outcomes vary widely among high-income countries, although mental health problems represent an increasing proportion of the burden of disease for all countries. This has led to increased demand for healthcare services, but mental health outcomes may also be particularly sensitive to the availability of social services. This paper examines the variation in the absolute and relative amounts that high-income countries spend on healthcare and social services to determine whether increased expenditure on social services relative to healthcare expenditure might be associated with better mental health outcomes. METHODS: This paper estimates the association between patterns of government spending and population mental health, as measured by the death rate resulting from mental and behavioural disorders, across member countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). We use country-level repeated measures multivariable modelling for the period from 1995 to 2016 with region and time effects, adjusted for total spending and demographic and economic characteristics. Healthcare spending includes all curative services, long-term care, ancillary services, medical goods, preventative care and administration whilst social spending consists of all transfer payments made to individuals and families as part of the welfare state. RESULTS: We find that a higher ratio of social to healthcare expenditure is associated with significantly better mental health outcomes for OECD populations, as measured by the death rate resulting from mental and behavioural disorders. We also find that there is no statistically significant association between healthcare spending and population mental health when we do not control for social spending. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that OECD countries can have a significant impact on population mental health by investing a greater proportion of total expenditure in social services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7098116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70981162020-03-27 Managing mental health: why we need to redress the balance between healthcare spending and social spending Park, Daniel S. Han, Jing Torabi, Mahmoud Forget, Evelyn L. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Mental health outcomes vary widely among high-income countries, although mental health problems represent an increasing proportion of the burden of disease for all countries. This has led to increased demand for healthcare services, but mental health outcomes may also be particularly sensitive to the availability of social services. This paper examines the variation in the absolute and relative amounts that high-income countries spend on healthcare and social services to determine whether increased expenditure on social services relative to healthcare expenditure might be associated with better mental health outcomes. METHODS: This paper estimates the association between patterns of government spending and population mental health, as measured by the death rate resulting from mental and behavioural disorders, across member countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). We use country-level repeated measures multivariable modelling for the period from 1995 to 2016 with region and time effects, adjusted for total spending and demographic and economic characteristics. Healthcare spending includes all curative services, long-term care, ancillary services, medical goods, preventative care and administration whilst social spending consists of all transfer payments made to individuals and families as part of the welfare state. RESULTS: We find that a higher ratio of social to healthcare expenditure is associated with significantly better mental health outcomes for OECD populations, as measured by the death rate resulting from mental and behavioural disorders. We also find that there is no statistically significant association between healthcare spending and population mental health when we do not control for social spending. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that OECD countries can have a significant impact on population mental health by investing a greater proportion of total expenditure in social services. BioMed Central 2020-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7098116/ /pubmed/32216782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08491-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Daniel S.
Han, Jing
Torabi, Mahmoud
Forget, Evelyn L.
Managing mental health: why we need to redress the balance between healthcare spending and social spending
title Managing mental health: why we need to redress the balance between healthcare spending and social spending
title_full Managing mental health: why we need to redress the balance between healthcare spending and social spending
title_fullStr Managing mental health: why we need to redress the balance between healthcare spending and social spending
title_full_unstemmed Managing mental health: why we need to redress the balance between healthcare spending and social spending
title_short Managing mental health: why we need to redress the balance between healthcare spending and social spending
title_sort managing mental health: why we need to redress the balance between healthcare spending and social spending
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7098116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32216782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08491-1
work_keys_str_mv AT parkdaniels managingmentalhealthwhyweneedtoredressthebalancebetweenhealthcarespendingandsocialspending
AT hanjing managingmentalhealthwhyweneedtoredressthebalancebetweenhealthcarespendingandsocialspending
AT torabimahmoud managingmentalhealthwhyweneedtoredressthebalancebetweenhealthcarespendingandsocialspending
AT forgetevelynl managingmentalhealthwhyweneedtoredressthebalancebetweenhealthcarespendingandsocialspending