Cargando…
Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
BACKGROUND: ABP 710 is being developed as a biosimilar to infliximab reference product (RP). Analytical similarity and pharmacokinetic equivalence between the two have been previously demonstrated. Here we report results from a comparative clinical study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABP...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7098142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32216829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-2142-1 |
_version_ | 1783511133892640768 |
---|---|
author | Genovese, Mark C. Sanchez-Burson, Juan Oh, MyungShin Balazs, Eva Neal, Jeffrey Everding, Andrea Hala, Tomas Wojciechowski, Rafal Fanjiang, Gary Cohen, Stanley |
author_facet | Genovese, Mark C. Sanchez-Burson, Juan Oh, MyungShin Balazs, Eva Neal, Jeffrey Everding, Andrea Hala, Tomas Wojciechowski, Rafal Fanjiang, Gary Cohen, Stanley |
author_sort | Genovese, Mark C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: ABP 710 is being developed as a biosimilar to infliximab reference product (RP). Analytical similarity and pharmacokinetic equivalence between the two have been previously demonstrated. Here we report results from a comparative clinical study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABP 710 relative to the RP in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 50-week equivalence study, patients with moderate to severe active RA despite methotrexate received 3-mg/kg infusions of ABP 710 or RP at predetermined intervals based on initial randomization and then with re-randomization at week 22. The primary endpoint was response difference (RD) of ACR20 at week 22, with clinical equivalence evaluated based on 90% CI of − 15%, 15%. Secondary endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 across time, as well as safety and immunogenicity assessments. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients were randomized for the initial treatment (ABP 710 n = 279; RP n = 279). The estimated RD of ACR20 at week 22 was 9.37% with 90% CI (2.67%, 15.96%). The lower bound was within the pre-specified criteria, thus confirming non-inferiority; the upper bound exceeded the pre-specified criteria by 0.96% such that superiority could not be ruled out statistically. In a post hoc analysis with adjustment for random imbalance in baseline factors, the CI of RD was narrowed (0.75%, 13.62%). Changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP as well as ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates across time and hybrid ACR evaluations were similar for the initial and initial/re-randomized treatment groups. Adverse events and incidence of anti-drug antibodies were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These efficacy and safety results support similarity with no clinically meaningful differences between ABP 710 and infliximab RP. Although we were unable to statistically confirm non-superiority, post hoc analysis was supportive of non-superiority. DAS28-CRP, ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and hybrid ACR evaluations over the entire study were consistently comparable as were safety and immunogenicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02937701. Registered August 30, 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7098142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70981422020-03-27 Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Genovese, Mark C. Sanchez-Burson, Juan Oh, MyungShin Balazs, Eva Neal, Jeffrey Everding, Andrea Hala, Tomas Wojciechowski, Rafal Fanjiang, Gary Cohen, Stanley Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: ABP 710 is being developed as a biosimilar to infliximab reference product (RP). Analytical similarity and pharmacokinetic equivalence between the two have been previously demonstrated. Here we report results from a comparative clinical study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABP 710 relative to the RP in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 50-week equivalence study, patients with moderate to severe active RA despite methotrexate received 3-mg/kg infusions of ABP 710 or RP at predetermined intervals based on initial randomization and then with re-randomization at week 22. The primary endpoint was response difference (RD) of ACR20 at week 22, with clinical equivalence evaluated based on 90% CI of − 15%, 15%. Secondary endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 across time, as well as safety and immunogenicity assessments. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients were randomized for the initial treatment (ABP 710 n = 279; RP n = 279). The estimated RD of ACR20 at week 22 was 9.37% with 90% CI (2.67%, 15.96%). The lower bound was within the pre-specified criteria, thus confirming non-inferiority; the upper bound exceeded the pre-specified criteria by 0.96% such that superiority could not be ruled out statistically. In a post hoc analysis with adjustment for random imbalance in baseline factors, the CI of RD was narrowed (0.75%, 13.62%). Changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP as well as ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates across time and hybrid ACR evaluations were similar for the initial and initial/re-randomized treatment groups. Adverse events and incidence of anti-drug antibodies were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These efficacy and safety results support similarity with no clinically meaningful differences between ABP 710 and infliximab RP. Although we were unable to statistically confirm non-superiority, post hoc analysis was supportive of non-superiority. DAS28-CRP, ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and hybrid ACR evaluations over the entire study were consistently comparable as were safety and immunogenicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02937701. Registered August 30, 2016. BioMed Central 2020-03-26 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7098142/ /pubmed/32216829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-2142-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Genovese, Mark C. Sanchez-Burson, Juan Oh, MyungShin Balazs, Eva Neal, Jeffrey Everding, Andrea Hala, Tomas Wojciechowski, Rafal Fanjiang, Gary Cohen, Stanley Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title | Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full | Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_fullStr | Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_short | Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_sort | comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar abp 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7098142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32216829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-2142-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT genovesemarkc comparativeclinicalefficacyandsafetyoftheproposedbiosimilarabp710withinfliximabreferenceproductinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT sanchezbursonjuan comparativeclinicalefficacyandsafetyoftheproposedbiosimilarabp710withinfliximabreferenceproductinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT ohmyungshin comparativeclinicalefficacyandsafetyoftheproposedbiosimilarabp710withinfliximabreferenceproductinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT balazseva comparativeclinicalefficacyandsafetyoftheproposedbiosimilarabp710withinfliximabreferenceproductinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT nealjeffrey comparativeclinicalefficacyandsafetyoftheproposedbiosimilarabp710withinfliximabreferenceproductinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT everdingandrea comparativeclinicalefficacyandsafetyoftheproposedbiosimilarabp710withinfliximabreferenceproductinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT halatomas comparativeclinicalefficacyandsafetyoftheproposedbiosimilarabp710withinfliximabreferenceproductinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT wojciechowskirafal comparativeclinicalefficacyandsafetyoftheproposedbiosimilarabp710withinfliximabreferenceproductinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT fanjianggary comparativeclinicalefficacyandsafetyoftheproposedbiosimilarabp710withinfliximabreferenceproductinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT cohenstanley comparativeclinicalefficacyandsafetyoftheproposedbiosimilarabp710withinfliximabreferenceproductinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis |