Cargando…

Design and testing of a 96-channel neural interface module for the Networked Neuroprosthesis system

BACKGROUND: The loss of motor functions resulting from spinal cord injury can have devastating implications on the quality of one’s life. Functional electrical stimulation has been used to help restore mobility, however, current functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems require residual moveme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bullard, Autumn J., Nason, Samuel R., Irwin, Zachary T., Nu, Chrono S., Smith, Brian, Campean, Alex, Peckham, P. Hunter, Kilgore, Kevin L., Willsey, Matthew S., Patil, Parag G., Chestek, Cynthia A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7098219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32232094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42234-019-0019-x
_version_ 1783511149367525376
author Bullard, Autumn J.
Nason, Samuel R.
Irwin, Zachary T.
Nu, Chrono S.
Smith, Brian
Campean, Alex
Peckham, P. Hunter
Kilgore, Kevin L.
Willsey, Matthew S.
Patil, Parag G.
Chestek, Cynthia A.
author_facet Bullard, Autumn J.
Nason, Samuel R.
Irwin, Zachary T.
Nu, Chrono S.
Smith, Brian
Campean, Alex
Peckham, P. Hunter
Kilgore, Kevin L.
Willsey, Matthew S.
Patil, Parag G.
Chestek, Cynthia A.
author_sort Bullard, Autumn J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The loss of motor functions resulting from spinal cord injury can have devastating implications on the quality of one’s life. Functional electrical stimulation has been used to help restore mobility, however, current functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems require residual movements to control stimulation patterns, which may be unintuitive and not useful for individuals with higher level cervical injuries. Brain machine interfaces (BMI) offer a promising approach for controlling such systems; however, they currently still require transcutaneous leads connecting indwelling electrodes to external recording devices. While several wireless BMI systems have been designed, high signal bandwidth requirements limit clinical translation. Case Western Reserve University has developed an implantable, modular FES system, the Networked Neuroprosthesis (NNP), to perform combinations of myoelectric recording and neural stimulation for controlling motor functions. However, currently the existing module capabilities are not sufficient for intracortical recordings. METHODS: Here we designed and tested a 1 × 4 cm, 96-channel neural recording module prototype to fit within the specifications to mate with the NNP. The neural recording module extracts power between 0.3–1 kHz, instead of transmitting the raw, high bandwidth neural data to decrease power requirements. RESULTS: The module consumed 33.6 mW while sampling 96 channels at approximately 2 kSps. We also investigated the relationship between average spiking band power and neural spike rate, which produced a maximum correlation of R = 0.8656 (Monkey N) and R = 0.8023 (Monkey W). CONCLUSION: Our experimental results show that we can record and transmit 96 channels at 2ksps within the power restrictions of the NNP system and successfully communicate over the NNP network. We believe this device can be used as an extension to the NNP to produce a clinically viable, fully implantable, intracortically-controlled FES system and advance the field of bioelectronic medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7098219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70982192020-03-30 Design and testing of a 96-channel neural interface module for the Networked Neuroprosthesis system Bullard, Autumn J. Nason, Samuel R. Irwin, Zachary T. Nu, Chrono S. Smith, Brian Campean, Alex Peckham, P. Hunter Kilgore, Kevin L. Willsey, Matthew S. Patil, Parag G. Chestek, Cynthia A. Bioelectron Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The loss of motor functions resulting from spinal cord injury can have devastating implications on the quality of one’s life. Functional electrical stimulation has been used to help restore mobility, however, current functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems require residual movements to control stimulation patterns, which may be unintuitive and not useful for individuals with higher level cervical injuries. Brain machine interfaces (BMI) offer a promising approach for controlling such systems; however, they currently still require transcutaneous leads connecting indwelling electrodes to external recording devices. While several wireless BMI systems have been designed, high signal bandwidth requirements limit clinical translation. Case Western Reserve University has developed an implantable, modular FES system, the Networked Neuroprosthesis (NNP), to perform combinations of myoelectric recording and neural stimulation for controlling motor functions. However, currently the existing module capabilities are not sufficient for intracortical recordings. METHODS: Here we designed and tested a 1 × 4 cm, 96-channel neural recording module prototype to fit within the specifications to mate with the NNP. The neural recording module extracts power between 0.3–1 kHz, instead of transmitting the raw, high bandwidth neural data to decrease power requirements. RESULTS: The module consumed 33.6 mW while sampling 96 channels at approximately 2 kSps. We also investigated the relationship between average spiking band power and neural spike rate, which produced a maximum correlation of R = 0.8656 (Monkey N) and R = 0.8023 (Monkey W). CONCLUSION: Our experimental results show that we can record and transmit 96 channels at 2ksps within the power restrictions of the NNP system and successfully communicate over the NNP network. We believe this device can be used as an extension to the NNP to produce a clinically viable, fully implantable, intracortically-controlled FES system and advance the field of bioelectronic medicine. BioMed Central 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7098219/ /pubmed/32232094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42234-019-0019-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bullard, Autumn J.
Nason, Samuel R.
Irwin, Zachary T.
Nu, Chrono S.
Smith, Brian
Campean, Alex
Peckham, P. Hunter
Kilgore, Kevin L.
Willsey, Matthew S.
Patil, Parag G.
Chestek, Cynthia A.
Design and testing of a 96-channel neural interface module for the Networked Neuroprosthesis system
title Design and testing of a 96-channel neural interface module for the Networked Neuroprosthesis system
title_full Design and testing of a 96-channel neural interface module for the Networked Neuroprosthesis system
title_fullStr Design and testing of a 96-channel neural interface module for the Networked Neuroprosthesis system
title_full_unstemmed Design and testing of a 96-channel neural interface module for the Networked Neuroprosthesis system
title_short Design and testing of a 96-channel neural interface module for the Networked Neuroprosthesis system
title_sort design and testing of a 96-channel neural interface module for the networked neuroprosthesis system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7098219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32232094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42234-019-0019-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bullardautumnj designandtestingofa96channelneuralinterfacemoduleforthenetworkedneuroprosthesissystem
AT nasonsamuelr designandtestingofa96channelneuralinterfacemoduleforthenetworkedneuroprosthesissystem
AT irwinzacharyt designandtestingofa96channelneuralinterfacemoduleforthenetworkedneuroprosthesissystem
AT nuchronos designandtestingofa96channelneuralinterfacemoduleforthenetworkedneuroprosthesissystem
AT smithbrian designandtestingofa96channelneuralinterfacemoduleforthenetworkedneuroprosthesissystem
AT campeanalex designandtestingofa96channelneuralinterfacemoduleforthenetworkedneuroprosthesissystem
AT peckhamphunter designandtestingofa96channelneuralinterfacemoduleforthenetworkedneuroprosthesissystem
AT kilgorekevinl designandtestingofa96channelneuralinterfacemoduleforthenetworkedneuroprosthesissystem
AT willseymatthews designandtestingofa96channelneuralinterfacemoduleforthenetworkedneuroprosthesissystem
AT patilparagg designandtestingofa96channelneuralinterfacemoduleforthenetworkedneuroprosthesissystem
AT chestekcynthiaa designandtestingofa96channelneuralinterfacemoduleforthenetworkedneuroprosthesissystem