Cargando…

Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel

Rapid identification from positive blood cultures is standard of care (SOC) in many clinical microbiology laboratories. The GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a multiplex nucleic acid amplification assay based on competitive DNA hybridization and electroch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carroll, Karen C., Reid, Jennifer L., Thornberg, Adam, Whitfield, Natalie N., Trainor, Deirdre, Lewis, Shawna, Wakefield, Teresa, Davis, Thomas E., Church, Keisha G., Samuel, Linoj, Mills, Ray, Jim, Patricia, Young, Stephen, Nolte, Frederick S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7098771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01730-19
_version_ 1783511228608413696
author Carroll, Karen C.
Reid, Jennifer L.
Thornberg, Adam
Whitfield, Natalie N.
Trainor, Deirdre
Lewis, Shawna
Wakefield, Teresa
Davis, Thomas E.
Church, Keisha G.
Samuel, Linoj
Mills, Ray
Jim, Patricia
Young, Stephen
Nolte, Frederick S.
author_facet Carroll, Karen C.
Reid, Jennifer L.
Thornberg, Adam
Whitfield, Natalie N.
Trainor, Deirdre
Lewis, Shawna
Wakefield, Teresa
Davis, Thomas E.
Church, Keisha G.
Samuel, Linoj
Mills, Ray
Jim, Patricia
Young, Stephen
Nolte, Frederick S.
author_sort Carroll, Karen C.
collection PubMed
description Rapid identification from positive blood cultures is standard of care (SOC) in many clinical microbiology laboratories. The GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a multiplex nucleic acid amplification assay based on competitive DNA hybridization and electrochemical detection using eSensor technology. This multicenter study compared the investigational-use-only (IUO) BCID-GP Panel to other methods of identification of 20 Gram-positive bacteria, four antimicrobial resistance genes, and both Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets that are unique to the BCID-GP Panel. Ten microbiology laboratories throughout the United States collected residual, deidentified positive blood culture samples for analysis. Five laboratories tested both clinical and contrived samples with the BCID-GP Panel. Comparator identification methods included each laboratory’s SOC, which included matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and automated identification systems as well as targeted PCR/analytically validated real-time PCR (qPCR) with bidirectional sequencing. A total of 2,342 evaluable samples (1,777 clinical and 565 contrived) were tested with the BCID-GP Panel. The overall sample accuracy for on-panel organisms was 89% before resolution of discordant results. For pathogenic Gram-positive targets (Bacillus cereus group, Enterococcus spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Listeria spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus group, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes), positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) ranged from 93.1% to 100% and 98.8% to 100%, respectively. For contamination rule-out targets (Bacillus subtilis group, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium acnes, Lactobacillus, and Micrococcus), PPA and NPA ranged from 84.5% to 100% and 99.9% to 100%, respectively. Positive percent agreement and NPA for the Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets were 92.4% and 95.7% for the former and 99.9% and 99.6% for the latter. The PPAs for resistance markers were as follows: mecA, 97.2%; mecC, 100%; vanA, 96.8%; and vanB, 100%. Negative percent agreement ranged from 96.6% to 100%. In conclusion, the ePlex BCID-GP Panel compares favorably to SOC and targeted molecular methods for the identification of 20 Gram-positive pathogens and four antimicrobial resistance genes in positive blood culture bottles. This panel detects a broad range of pathogens and mixed infections with yeast and Gram-negative organisms from the same positive blood culture bottle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7098771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70987712020-04-09 Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel Carroll, Karen C. Reid, Jennifer L. Thornberg, Adam Whitfield, Natalie N. Trainor, Deirdre Lewis, Shawna Wakefield, Teresa Davis, Thomas E. Church, Keisha G. Samuel, Linoj Mills, Ray Jim, Patricia Young, Stephen Nolte, Frederick S. J Clin Microbiol Bacteriology Rapid identification from positive blood cultures is standard of care (SOC) in many clinical microbiology laboratories. The GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a multiplex nucleic acid amplification assay based on competitive DNA hybridization and electrochemical detection using eSensor technology. This multicenter study compared the investigational-use-only (IUO) BCID-GP Panel to other methods of identification of 20 Gram-positive bacteria, four antimicrobial resistance genes, and both Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets that are unique to the BCID-GP Panel. Ten microbiology laboratories throughout the United States collected residual, deidentified positive blood culture samples for analysis. Five laboratories tested both clinical and contrived samples with the BCID-GP Panel. Comparator identification methods included each laboratory’s SOC, which included matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and automated identification systems as well as targeted PCR/analytically validated real-time PCR (qPCR) with bidirectional sequencing. A total of 2,342 evaluable samples (1,777 clinical and 565 contrived) were tested with the BCID-GP Panel. The overall sample accuracy for on-panel organisms was 89% before resolution of discordant results. For pathogenic Gram-positive targets (Bacillus cereus group, Enterococcus spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Listeria spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus group, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes), positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) ranged from 93.1% to 100% and 98.8% to 100%, respectively. For contamination rule-out targets (Bacillus subtilis group, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium acnes, Lactobacillus, and Micrococcus), PPA and NPA ranged from 84.5% to 100% and 99.9% to 100%, respectively. Positive percent agreement and NPA for the Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets were 92.4% and 95.7% for the former and 99.9% and 99.6% for the latter. The PPAs for resistance markers were as follows: mecA, 97.2%; mecC, 100%; vanA, 96.8%; and vanB, 100%. Negative percent agreement ranged from 96.6% to 100%. In conclusion, the ePlex BCID-GP Panel compares favorably to SOC and targeted molecular methods for the identification of 20 Gram-positive pathogens and four antimicrobial resistance genes in positive blood culture bottles. This panel detects a broad range of pathogens and mixed infections with yeast and Gram-negative organisms from the same positive blood culture bottle. American Society for Microbiology 2020-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7098771/ /pubmed/31996444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01730-19 Text en Copyright © 2020 Carroll et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Bacteriology
Carroll, Karen C.
Reid, Jennifer L.
Thornberg, Adam
Whitfield, Natalie N.
Trainor, Deirdre
Lewis, Shawna
Wakefield, Teresa
Davis, Thomas E.
Church, Keisha G.
Samuel, Linoj
Mills, Ray
Jim, Patricia
Young, Stephen
Nolte, Frederick S.
Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel
title Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel
title_full Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel
title_fullStr Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel
title_short Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel
title_sort clinical performance of the novel genmark dx eplex blood culture id gram-positive panel
topic Bacteriology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7098771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01730-19
work_keys_str_mv AT carrollkarenc clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT reidjenniferl clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT thornbergadam clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT whitfieldnatalien clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT trainordeirdre clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT lewisshawna clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT wakefieldteresa clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT davisthomase clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT churchkeishag clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT samuellinoj clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT millsray clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT jimpatricia clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT youngstephen clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel
AT noltefredericks clinicalperformanceofthenovelgenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidgrampositivepanel