Cargando…

Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids

In common practice, hearing aids are fitted by a clinician who measures an audiogram and uses it to generate prescriptive gain and output targets. This report describes an alternative method where users select their own signal processing parameters using an interface consisting of two wheels that op...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabin, Andrew T., Van Tasell, Dianne J., Rabinowitz, Bill, Dhar, Sumitrajit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7099667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32003285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519900589
_version_ 1783511351312777216
author Sabin, Andrew T.
Van Tasell, Dianne J.
Rabinowitz, Bill
Dhar, Sumitrajit
author_facet Sabin, Andrew T.
Van Tasell, Dianne J.
Rabinowitz, Bill
Dhar, Sumitrajit
author_sort Sabin, Andrew T.
collection PubMed
description In common practice, hearing aids are fitted by a clinician who measures an audiogram and uses it to generate prescriptive gain and output targets. This report describes an alternative method where users select their own signal processing parameters using an interface consisting of two wheels that optimally map to simultaneous control of gain and compression in each frequency band. The real-world performance of this approach was evaluated via a take-home field trial. Participants with hearing loss were fitted using clinical best practices (audiogram, fit to target, real-ear verification, and subsequent fine tuning). Then, in their everyday lives over the course of a month, participants either selected their own parameters using this new interface (Self group; n = 38) or used the parameters selected by the clinician with limited control (Audiologist Best Practices Group; n = 37). On average, the gain selected by the Self group was within 1.8 dB overall and 5.6 dB per band of that selected by the audiologist. Participants in the Self group reported better sound quality than did those in the Audiologist Best Practices group. In blind sound quality comparisons conducted in the field, participants in the Self group slightly preferred the parameters they selected over those selected by the clinician. Finally, there were no differences between groups in terms of standard clinical measures of hearing aid benefit or speech perception in noise. Overall, the results indicate that it is possible for users to select effective amplification parameters by themselves using a simple interface that maps to key hearing aid signal processing parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7099667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70996672020-04-03 Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids Sabin, Andrew T. Van Tasell, Dianne J. Rabinowitz, Bill Dhar, Sumitrajit Trends Hear Original Article In common practice, hearing aids are fitted by a clinician who measures an audiogram and uses it to generate prescriptive gain and output targets. This report describes an alternative method where users select their own signal processing parameters using an interface consisting of two wheels that optimally map to simultaneous control of gain and compression in each frequency band. The real-world performance of this approach was evaluated via a take-home field trial. Participants with hearing loss were fitted using clinical best practices (audiogram, fit to target, real-ear verification, and subsequent fine tuning). Then, in their everyday lives over the course of a month, participants either selected their own parameters using this new interface (Self group; n = 38) or used the parameters selected by the clinician with limited control (Audiologist Best Practices Group; n = 37). On average, the gain selected by the Self group was within 1.8 dB overall and 5.6 dB per band of that selected by the audiologist. Participants in the Self group reported better sound quality than did those in the Audiologist Best Practices group. In blind sound quality comparisons conducted in the field, participants in the Self group slightly preferred the parameters they selected over those selected by the clinician. Finally, there were no differences between groups in terms of standard clinical measures of hearing aid benefit or speech perception in noise. Overall, the results indicate that it is possible for users to select effective amplification parameters by themselves using a simple interface that maps to key hearing aid signal processing parameters. SAGE Publications 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7099667/ /pubmed/32003285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519900589 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sabin, Andrew T.
Van Tasell, Dianne J.
Rabinowitz, Bill
Dhar, Sumitrajit
Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids
title Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids
title_full Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids
title_fullStr Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids
title_short Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids
title_sort validation of a self-fitting method for over-the-counter hearing aids
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7099667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32003285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519900589
work_keys_str_mv AT sabinandrewt validationofaselffittingmethodforoverthecounterhearingaids
AT vantaselldiannej validationofaselffittingmethodforoverthecounterhearingaids
AT rabinowitzbill validationofaselffittingmethodforoverthecounterhearingaids
AT dharsumitrajit validationofaselffittingmethodforoverthecounterhearingaids