Cargando…
Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids
In common practice, hearing aids are fitted by a clinician who measures an audiogram and uses it to generate prescriptive gain and output targets. This report describes an alternative method where users select their own signal processing parameters using an interface consisting of two wheels that op...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7099667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32003285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519900589 |
_version_ | 1783511351312777216 |
---|---|
author | Sabin, Andrew T. Van Tasell, Dianne J. Rabinowitz, Bill Dhar, Sumitrajit |
author_facet | Sabin, Andrew T. Van Tasell, Dianne J. Rabinowitz, Bill Dhar, Sumitrajit |
author_sort | Sabin, Andrew T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In common practice, hearing aids are fitted by a clinician who measures an audiogram and uses it to generate prescriptive gain and output targets. This report describes an alternative method where users select their own signal processing parameters using an interface consisting of two wheels that optimally map to simultaneous control of gain and compression in each frequency band. The real-world performance of this approach was evaluated via a take-home field trial. Participants with hearing loss were fitted using clinical best practices (audiogram, fit to target, real-ear verification, and subsequent fine tuning). Then, in their everyday lives over the course of a month, participants either selected their own parameters using this new interface (Self group; n = 38) or used the parameters selected by the clinician with limited control (Audiologist Best Practices Group; n = 37). On average, the gain selected by the Self group was within 1.8 dB overall and 5.6 dB per band of that selected by the audiologist. Participants in the Self group reported better sound quality than did those in the Audiologist Best Practices group. In blind sound quality comparisons conducted in the field, participants in the Self group slightly preferred the parameters they selected over those selected by the clinician. Finally, there were no differences between groups in terms of standard clinical measures of hearing aid benefit or speech perception in noise. Overall, the results indicate that it is possible for users to select effective amplification parameters by themselves using a simple interface that maps to key hearing aid signal processing parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7099667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70996672020-04-03 Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids Sabin, Andrew T. Van Tasell, Dianne J. Rabinowitz, Bill Dhar, Sumitrajit Trends Hear Original Article In common practice, hearing aids are fitted by a clinician who measures an audiogram and uses it to generate prescriptive gain and output targets. This report describes an alternative method where users select their own signal processing parameters using an interface consisting of two wheels that optimally map to simultaneous control of gain and compression in each frequency band. The real-world performance of this approach was evaluated via a take-home field trial. Participants with hearing loss were fitted using clinical best practices (audiogram, fit to target, real-ear verification, and subsequent fine tuning). Then, in their everyday lives over the course of a month, participants either selected their own parameters using this new interface (Self group; n = 38) or used the parameters selected by the clinician with limited control (Audiologist Best Practices Group; n = 37). On average, the gain selected by the Self group was within 1.8 dB overall and 5.6 dB per band of that selected by the audiologist. Participants in the Self group reported better sound quality than did those in the Audiologist Best Practices group. In blind sound quality comparisons conducted in the field, participants in the Self group slightly preferred the parameters they selected over those selected by the clinician. Finally, there were no differences between groups in terms of standard clinical measures of hearing aid benefit or speech perception in noise. Overall, the results indicate that it is possible for users to select effective amplification parameters by themselves using a simple interface that maps to key hearing aid signal processing parameters. SAGE Publications 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7099667/ /pubmed/32003285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519900589 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sabin, Andrew T. Van Tasell, Dianne J. Rabinowitz, Bill Dhar, Sumitrajit Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids |
title | Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids |
title_full | Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids |
title_fullStr | Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids |
title_short | Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids |
title_sort | validation of a self-fitting method for over-the-counter hearing aids |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7099667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32003285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519900589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sabinandrewt validationofaselffittingmethodforoverthecounterhearingaids AT vantaselldiannej validationofaselffittingmethodforoverthecounterhearingaids AT rabinowitzbill validationofaselffittingmethodforoverthecounterhearingaids AT dharsumitrajit validationofaselffittingmethodforoverthecounterhearingaids |