Cargando…
Judicial analytics and the great transformation of American Law
Predictive judicial analytics holds the promise of increasing efficiency and fairness of law. Judicial analytics can assess extra-legal factors that influence decisions. Behavioral anomalies in judicial decision-making offer an intuitive understanding of feature relevance, which can then be used for...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7099886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32255924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9237-x |
_version_ | 1783511388342190080 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Daniel L. |
author_facet | Chen, Daniel L. |
author_sort | Chen, Daniel L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Predictive judicial analytics holds the promise of increasing efficiency and fairness of law. Judicial analytics can assess extra-legal factors that influence decisions. Behavioral anomalies in judicial decision-making offer an intuitive understanding of feature relevance, which can then be used for debiasing the law. A conceptual distinction between inter-judge disparities in predictions and inter-judge disparities in prediction accuracy suggests another normatively relevant criterion with regards to fairness. Predictive analytics can also be used in the first step of causal inference, where the features employed in the first step are exogenous to the case. Machine learning thus offers an approach to assess bias in the law and evaluate theories about the potential consequences of legal change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7099886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70998862020-03-30 Judicial analytics and the great transformation of American Law Chen, Daniel L. Artif Intell Law (Dordr) Article Predictive judicial analytics holds the promise of increasing efficiency and fairness of law. Judicial analytics can assess extra-legal factors that influence decisions. Behavioral anomalies in judicial decision-making offer an intuitive understanding of feature relevance, which can then be used for debiasing the law. A conceptual distinction between inter-judge disparities in predictions and inter-judge disparities in prediction accuracy suggests another normatively relevant criterion with regards to fairness. Predictive analytics can also be used in the first step of causal inference, where the features employed in the first step are exogenous to the case. Machine learning thus offers an approach to assess bias in the law and evaluate theories about the potential consequences of legal change. Springer Netherlands 2018-12-10 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7099886/ /pubmed/32255924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9237-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Daniel L. Judicial analytics and the great transformation of American Law |
title | Judicial analytics and the great transformation of American Law |
title_full | Judicial analytics and the great transformation of American Law |
title_fullStr | Judicial analytics and the great transformation of American Law |
title_full_unstemmed | Judicial analytics and the great transformation of American Law |
title_short | Judicial analytics and the great transformation of American Law |
title_sort | judicial analytics and the great transformation of american law |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7099886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32255924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9237-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chendaniell judicialanalyticsandthegreattransformationofamericanlaw |