Cargando…

A Brief History of Biocontainment

The concept of clinical biocontainment, otherwise known as high-level containment care (HLCC), had its birth among a confluence of near-simultaneous events in 1969. The U.S. Army’s Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) began construction of the first modern biocontainment unit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cieslak, Theodore J, Kortepeter, Mark G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7099915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40506-016-0096-2
_version_ 1783511392395984896
author Cieslak, Theodore J
Kortepeter, Mark G
author_facet Cieslak, Theodore J
Kortepeter, Mark G
author_sort Cieslak, Theodore J
collection PubMed
description The concept of clinical biocontainment, otherwise known as high-level containment care (HLCC), had its birth among a confluence of near-simultaneous events in 1969. The U.S. Army’s Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) began construction of the first modern biocontainment unit that year, and opened the two-bed facility, often referred to as “the Slammer” in 1971. Over its 41-year existence, 21 persons exposed to highly hazardous infectious diseases were admitted to the Slammer, but none ever contracted the disease to which they had been exposed. Owing, in part, to this underutilization, some questioned the utility of HLCC units. This concern notwithstanding, Emory University and the University of Nebraska opened HLCC units in civilian academic medical centers in 2004 and 2005, respectively. These units, distinct from conventional infectious disease isolation wards found in most major medical centers, proved their worth during the West African Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak of 2014–2015. It is our opinion that such units, as well as the parallel high-level containment transport systems necessary to move patients to them, will continue to play an important role in the global response to emerging and highly hazardous contagious pathogens. Moreover, we feel that the lessons derived from their successful operation will lead to improvements in infection control procedures and practices throughout the healthcare system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7099915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70999152020-03-27 A Brief History of Biocontainment Cieslak, Theodore J Kortepeter, Mark G Curr Treat Options Infect Dis Ebola Virus Disease: Issues in Preparedness and Clinical Care (A Hewlett, Section Editor) The concept of clinical biocontainment, otherwise known as high-level containment care (HLCC), had its birth among a confluence of near-simultaneous events in 1969. The U.S. Army’s Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) began construction of the first modern biocontainment unit that year, and opened the two-bed facility, often referred to as “the Slammer” in 1971. Over its 41-year existence, 21 persons exposed to highly hazardous infectious diseases were admitted to the Slammer, but none ever contracted the disease to which they had been exposed. Owing, in part, to this underutilization, some questioned the utility of HLCC units. This concern notwithstanding, Emory University and the University of Nebraska opened HLCC units in civilian academic medical centers in 2004 and 2005, respectively. These units, distinct from conventional infectious disease isolation wards found in most major medical centers, proved their worth during the West African Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak of 2014–2015. It is our opinion that such units, as well as the parallel high-level containment transport systems necessary to move patients to them, will continue to play an important role in the global response to emerging and highly hazardous contagious pathogens. Moreover, we feel that the lessons derived from their successful operation will lead to improvements in infection control procedures and practices throughout the healthcare system. Springer US 2016-10-20 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC7099915/ /pubmed/32226328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40506-016-0096-2 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Ebola Virus Disease: Issues in Preparedness and Clinical Care (A Hewlett, Section Editor)
Cieslak, Theodore J
Kortepeter, Mark G
A Brief History of Biocontainment
title A Brief History of Biocontainment
title_full A Brief History of Biocontainment
title_fullStr A Brief History of Biocontainment
title_full_unstemmed A Brief History of Biocontainment
title_short A Brief History of Biocontainment
title_sort brief history of biocontainment
topic Ebola Virus Disease: Issues in Preparedness and Clinical Care (A Hewlett, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7099915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40506-016-0096-2
work_keys_str_mv AT cieslaktheodorej abriefhistoryofbiocontainment
AT kortepetermarkg abriefhistoryofbiocontainment
AT cieslaktheodorej briefhistoryofbiocontainment
AT kortepetermarkg briefhistoryofbiocontainment