Cargando…
The practical other: teleology and its development
We argue for teleology as a description of the way in which we ordinarily understand others’ intentional actions. Teleology starts from the close resemblance between the reasoning involved in understanding others’ actions and one’s own practical reasoning involved in deciding what to do. We carve ou...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7099935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2018.1453246 |
_version_ | 1783511394852798464 |
---|---|
author | Perner, Josef Priewasser, Beate Roessler, Johannes |
author_facet | Perner, Josef Priewasser, Beate Roessler, Johannes |
author_sort | Perner, Josef |
collection | PubMed |
description | We argue for teleology as a description of the way in which we ordinarily understand others’ intentional actions. Teleology starts from the close resemblance between the reasoning involved in understanding others’ actions and one’s own practical reasoning involved in deciding what to do. We carve out teleology’s distinctive features more sharply by comparing it to its three main competitors: theory theory, simulation theory, and rationality theory. The plausibility of teleology as our way of understanding others is underlined by developmental data in its favour. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7099935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70999352020-03-27 The practical other: teleology and its development Perner, Josef Priewasser, Beate Roessler, Johannes Interdiscip Sci Rev Article We argue for teleology as a description of the way in which we ordinarily understand others’ intentional actions. Teleology starts from the close resemblance between the reasoning involved in understanding others’ actions and one’s own practical reasoning involved in deciding what to do. We carve out teleology’s distinctive features more sharply by comparing it to its three main competitors: theory theory, simulation theory, and rationality theory. The plausibility of teleology as our way of understanding others is underlined by developmental data in its favour. 2018-04-26 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC7099935/ /pubmed/32226198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2018.1453246 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Perner, Josef Priewasser, Beate Roessler, Johannes The practical other: teleology and its development |
title | The practical other: teleology and its development |
title_full | The practical other: teleology and its development |
title_fullStr | The practical other: teleology and its development |
title_full_unstemmed | The practical other: teleology and its development |
title_short | The practical other: teleology and its development |
title_sort | practical other: teleology and its development |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7099935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2018.1453246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pernerjosef thepracticalotherteleologyanditsdevelopment AT priewasserbeate thepracticalotherteleologyanditsdevelopment AT roesslerjohannes thepracticalotherteleologyanditsdevelopment AT pernerjosef practicalotherteleologyanditsdevelopment AT priewasserbeate practicalotherteleologyanditsdevelopment AT roesslerjohannes practicalotherteleologyanditsdevelopment |