Cargando…

Decision Making and Oddball Effects on Pupil Size: Evidence for a Sequential Process

In our physical environment as well as in many experimental paradigms, we need to decide whether an occurring stimulus is relevant to us or not; further, stimuli have uneven probabilities to emerge. Both, decision making and the difference between rare and frequent stimuli (oddball effect) are descr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strauch, Christoph, Koniakowsky, Ina, Huckauf, Anke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7101007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32259015
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.96
_version_ 1783511535158558720
author Strauch, Christoph
Koniakowsky, Ina
Huckauf, Anke
author_facet Strauch, Christoph
Koniakowsky, Ina
Huckauf, Anke
author_sort Strauch, Christoph
collection PubMed
description In our physical environment as well as in many experimental paradigms, we need to decide whether an occurring stimulus is relevant to us or not; further, stimuli have uneven probabilities to emerge. Both, decision making and the difference between rare and frequent stimuli (oddball effect) are described to affect pupil dilation. Surprisingly though, conjoint systematic pupillometric investigations into both factors are still rare. In two experiments, both factors as well as their interplay were investigated. Participants completed a sequential letter matching task. In this task, stimulus probability and letter matching (decision making) were manipulated independently. As dependent variables, pupil dilation and reaction time were assessed. Results suggest a clearly larger pupil dilation for target than for distractor letters, even when targets were frequent and distractors rare. When considering the data structure best, no main effect of stimulus probability was found, instead, oddball effects only emerged when stimuli were goal-relevant to participants. The results are discussed in the light of common theoretical concepts of decision making and stimulus probability. Finally, relating theories of each factor, we propose an integrated framework for effects of decision making and stimulus features on pupil dilation. We assume a sequential mechanism during which incoming stimuli are decided upon regarding their goal relevance and, about 200 ms later, relevant stimuli are appraised regarding their value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7101007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71010072020-03-31 Decision Making and Oddball Effects on Pupil Size: Evidence for a Sequential Process Strauch, Christoph Koniakowsky, Ina Huckauf, Anke J Cogn Research Article In our physical environment as well as in many experimental paradigms, we need to decide whether an occurring stimulus is relevant to us or not; further, stimuli have uneven probabilities to emerge. Both, decision making and the difference between rare and frequent stimuli (oddball effect) are described to affect pupil dilation. Surprisingly though, conjoint systematic pupillometric investigations into both factors are still rare. In two experiments, both factors as well as their interplay were investigated. Participants completed a sequential letter matching task. In this task, stimulus probability and letter matching (decision making) were manipulated independently. As dependent variables, pupil dilation and reaction time were assessed. Results suggest a clearly larger pupil dilation for target than for distractor letters, even when targets were frequent and distractors rare. When considering the data structure best, no main effect of stimulus probability was found, instead, oddball effects only emerged when stimuli were goal-relevant to participants. The results are discussed in the light of common theoretical concepts of decision making and stimulus probability. Finally, relating theories of each factor, we propose an integrated framework for effects of decision making and stimulus features on pupil dilation. We assume a sequential mechanism during which incoming stimuli are decided upon regarding their goal relevance and, about 200 ms later, relevant stimuli are appraised regarding their value. Ubiquity Press 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7101007/ /pubmed/32259015 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.96 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Strauch, Christoph
Koniakowsky, Ina
Huckauf, Anke
Decision Making and Oddball Effects on Pupil Size: Evidence for a Sequential Process
title Decision Making and Oddball Effects on Pupil Size: Evidence for a Sequential Process
title_full Decision Making and Oddball Effects on Pupil Size: Evidence for a Sequential Process
title_fullStr Decision Making and Oddball Effects on Pupil Size: Evidence for a Sequential Process
title_full_unstemmed Decision Making and Oddball Effects on Pupil Size: Evidence for a Sequential Process
title_short Decision Making and Oddball Effects on Pupil Size: Evidence for a Sequential Process
title_sort decision making and oddball effects on pupil size: evidence for a sequential process
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7101007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32259015
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.96
work_keys_str_mv AT strauchchristoph decisionmakingandoddballeffectsonpupilsizeevidenceforasequentialprocess
AT koniakowskyina decisionmakingandoddballeffectsonpupilsizeevidenceforasequentialprocess
AT huckaufanke decisionmakingandoddballeffectsonpupilsizeevidenceforasequentialprocess