Cargando…

Coccolith mass and morphology of different Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes: A critical examination using Canary Islands material

Different morphotypes of the abundant marine calcifying algal species Emiliania huxleyi are commonly linked to various degrees of E. huxleyi calcification, but few studies have been done to validate this assumption. This study investigated therefore whether E. huxleyi morphotypes can be related to c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linge Johnsen, Simen Alexander, Bollmann, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7101162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230569
_version_ 1783511560974499840
author Linge Johnsen, Simen Alexander
Bollmann, Jörg
author_facet Linge Johnsen, Simen Alexander
Bollmann, Jörg
author_sort Linge Johnsen, Simen Alexander
collection PubMed
description Different morphotypes of the abundant marine calcifying algal species Emiliania huxleyi are commonly linked to various degrees of E. huxleyi calcification, but few studies have been done to validate this assumption. This study investigated therefore whether E. huxleyi morphotypes can be related to coccolithophore calcification and coccolith mass. Samples from January (high productivity) and September (low productivity) 1997 at an open ocean and a coastal site near the Canary Islands were analysed using a combination of thickness measurements (Circular Polarizer Retardation estimates (CPR) method), Scanning Electron Microscope imaging, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) models. Mean E. huxleyi coccolith mass varied from a maximum of 2.9pg at the open ocean station in January to a minimum of 1.7pg in September at both stations. In contrast, overall calcite produced by E. huxleyi (assuming 23 coccoliths/cell) varied from a maximum of 2.6 μgL(-1) at the coastal station in January to a minimum of 0.5 μgL(-1) in September at the open ocean site. The relative abundance of “Overcalcified” Type A, Type A, Group B and malformed coccoliths was determined from SEM images. The mean coccolith mass of “Overcalcified” Type A was 2.0pg using the CPR-method, while mean mass of Type A and Group B coccoliths was determined using coccolith length measurements from SEM images and MCMC models relating thickness measurements to morphotype relative abundance. Type A cocccolith mass varied from a 1.6pg to 2.6pg and Group B coccolith mass varied from 1.5pg to 2.0pg. These results demonstrate that the coccolith mass of Type A, “Overcalcified” Type A, and Group B do not differ systematically and there is no systematic relationship between relative abundance of a morphotype and the overall calcite production of E. huxleyi. Therefore, morphotype appearance and relative abundance can not be uniformly used as reliable indicators of E. huxleyi calcification or calcite production.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7101162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71011622020-04-03 Coccolith mass and morphology of different Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes: A critical examination using Canary Islands material Linge Johnsen, Simen Alexander Bollmann, Jörg PLoS One Research Article Different morphotypes of the abundant marine calcifying algal species Emiliania huxleyi are commonly linked to various degrees of E. huxleyi calcification, but few studies have been done to validate this assumption. This study investigated therefore whether E. huxleyi morphotypes can be related to coccolithophore calcification and coccolith mass. Samples from January (high productivity) and September (low productivity) 1997 at an open ocean and a coastal site near the Canary Islands were analysed using a combination of thickness measurements (Circular Polarizer Retardation estimates (CPR) method), Scanning Electron Microscope imaging, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) models. Mean E. huxleyi coccolith mass varied from a maximum of 2.9pg at the open ocean station in January to a minimum of 1.7pg in September at both stations. In contrast, overall calcite produced by E. huxleyi (assuming 23 coccoliths/cell) varied from a maximum of 2.6 μgL(-1) at the coastal station in January to a minimum of 0.5 μgL(-1) in September at the open ocean site. The relative abundance of “Overcalcified” Type A, Type A, Group B and malformed coccoliths was determined from SEM images. The mean coccolith mass of “Overcalcified” Type A was 2.0pg using the CPR-method, while mean mass of Type A and Group B coccoliths was determined using coccolith length measurements from SEM images and MCMC models relating thickness measurements to morphotype relative abundance. Type A cocccolith mass varied from a 1.6pg to 2.6pg and Group B coccolith mass varied from 1.5pg to 2.0pg. These results demonstrate that the coccolith mass of Type A, “Overcalcified” Type A, and Group B do not differ systematically and there is no systematic relationship between relative abundance of a morphotype and the overall calcite production of E. huxleyi. Therefore, morphotype appearance and relative abundance can not be uniformly used as reliable indicators of E. huxleyi calcification or calcite production. Public Library of Science 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7101162/ /pubmed/32218602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230569 Text en © 2020 Linge Johnsen, Bollmann http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Linge Johnsen, Simen Alexander
Bollmann, Jörg
Coccolith mass and morphology of different Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes: A critical examination using Canary Islands material
title Coccolith mass and morphology of different Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes: A critical examination using Canary Islands material
title_full Coccolith mass and morphology of different Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes: A critical examination using Canary Islands material
title_fullStr Coccolith mass and morphology of different Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes: A critical examination using Canary Islands material
title_full_unstemmed Coccolith mass and morphology of different Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes: A critical examination using Canary Islands material
title_short Coccolith mass and morphology of different Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes: A critical examination using Canary Islands material
title_sort coccolith mass and morphology of different emiliania huxleyi morphotypes: a critical examination using canary islands material
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7101162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230569
work_keys_str_mv AT lingejohnsensimenalexander coccolithmassandmorphologyofdifferentemilianiahuxleyimorphotypesacriticalexaminationusingcanaryislandsmaterial
AT bollmannjorg coccolithmassandmorphologyofdifferentemilianiahuxleyimorphotypesacriticalexaminationusingcanaryislandsmaterial