Cargando…

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of The Daily Mile on childhood weight outcomes and wellbeing: a cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The Daily Mile is designed to increase physical activity levels with children running or walking around school grounds for 15-min daily. It has been adopted by schools worldwide and endorsed as a solution to tackle obesity, despite no robust evidence of its benefits. We conducted a clust...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breheny, Katie, Passmore, Sandra, Adab, Peymane, Martin, James, Hemming, Karla, Lancashire, Emma R., Frew, Emma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7101281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0511-0
_version_ 1783511581503520768
author Breheny, Katie
Passmore, Sandra
Adab, Peymane
Martin, James
Hemming, Karla
Lancashire, Emma R.
Frew, Emma
author_facet Breheny, Katie
Passmore, Sandra
Adab, Peymane
Martin, James
Hemming, Karla
Lancashire, Emma R.
Frew, Emma
author_sort Breheny, Katie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Daily Mile is designed to increase physical activity levels with children running or walking around school grounds for 15-min daily. It has been adopted by schools worldwide and endorsed as a solution to tackle obesity, despite no robust evidence of its benefits. We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine its clinical and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Forty schools were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the Daily Mile intervention or control group in which only the usual school health and wellbeing activities were implemented. The primary outcome was BMI z-score (BMIz) at 12 months follow-up from baseline, with planned subgroup analysis to examine differential effects. Primary economic analysis outcome was incremental cost per Quality-Adjusted-Life-Year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Using a constrained randomisation approach, balanced on school size, baseline BMIz and proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals, 20 schools were allocated to intervention (n = 1,153 participants) and 20 to control (n = 1,127); 3 schools withdrew (2 intervention, 1 control). At 12 months, BMIz data were available for 18 intervention schools (n = 850) and 19 control schools (n = 820 participants). Using intention-to-treat analysis the adjusted mean difference (MD) in BMIz (intervention − control) was −0.036 (95% CI: −0.085 to 0.013, p = 0.146). Pre-specified subgroup analysis showed a significant interaction with sex (p = 0.001) suggesting a moderate size benefit of The Daily Mile in girls (MD −0.097, 95% CI −0.156 to −0.037). This was consistent with the exploratory economic results that showed The Daily Mile to be highly cost-effective in girls (£2,492 per QALY), but not in boys, and overall to have a 76% chance of cost-effectiveness for the whole sample, at the commonly applied UK threshold of £20,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Overall the Daily Mile had a small but non-significant effect on BMIz, however, it had a greater effect in girls suggesting that it might be considered as a cost-effective component of a system-wide approach to childhood obesity prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7101281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71012812020-03-30 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of The Daily Mile on childhood weight outcomes and wellbeing: a cluster randomised controlled trial Breheny, Katie Passmore, Sandra Adab, Peymane Martin, James Hemming, Karla Lancashire, Emma R. Frew, Emma Int J Obes (Lond) Article BACKGROUND: The Daily Mile is designed to increase physical activity levels with children running or walking around school grounds for 15-min daily. It has been adopted by schools worldwide and endorsed as a solution to tackle obesity, despite no robust evidence of its benefits. We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine its clinical and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Forty schools were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the Daily Mile intervention or control group in which only the usual school health and wellbeing activities were implemented. The primary outcome was BMI z-score (BMIz) at 12 months follow-up from baseline, with planned subgroup analysis to examine differential effects. Primary economic analysis outcome was incremental cost per Quality-Adjusted-Life-Year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Using a constrained randomisation approach, balanced on school size, baseline BMIz and proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals, 20 schools were allocated to intervention (n = 1,153 participants) and 20 to control (n = 1,127); 3 schools withdrew (2 intervention, 1 control). At 12 months, BMIz data were available for 18 intervention schools (n = 850) and 19 control schools (n = 820 participants). Using intention-to-treat analysis the adjusted mean difference (MD) in BMIz (intervention − control) was −0.036 (95% CI: −0.085 to 0.013, p = 0.146). Pre-specified subgroup analysis showed a significant interaction with sex (p = 0.001) suggesting a moderate size benefit of The Daily Mile in girls (MD −0.097, 95% CI −0.156 to −0.037). This was consistent with the exploratory economic results that showed The Daily Mile to be highly cost-effective in girls (£2,492 per QALY), but not in boys, and overall to have a 76% chance of cost-effectiveness for the whole sample, at the commonly applied UK threshold of £20,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Overall the Daily Mile had a small but non-significant effect on BMIz, however, it had a greater effect in girls suggesting that it might be considered as a cost-effective component of a system-wide approach to childhood obesity prevention. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7101281/ /pubmed/31988481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0511-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Breheny, Katie
Passmore, Sandra
Adab, Peymane
Martin, James
Hemming, Karla
Lancashire, Emma R.
Frew, Emma
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of The Daily Mile on childhood weight outcomes and wellbeing: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of The Daily Mile on childhood weight outcomes and wellbeing: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of The Daily Mile on childhood weight outcomes and wellbeing: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of The Daily Mile on childhood weight outcomes and wellbeing: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of The Daily Mile on childhood weight outcomes and wellbeing: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of The Daily Mile on childhood weight outcomes and wellbeing: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the daily mile on childhood weight outcomes and wellbeing: a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7101281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0511-0
work_keys_str_mv AT brehenykatie effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthedailymileonchildhoodweightoutcomesandwellbeingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT passmoresandra effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthedailymileonchildhoodweightoutcomesandwellbeingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT adabpeymane effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthedailymileonchildhoodweightoutcomesandwellbeingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT martinjames effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthedailymileonchildhoodweightoutcomesandwellbeingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hemmingkarla effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthedailymileonchildhoodweightoutcomesandwellbeingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lancashireemmar effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthedailymileonchildhoodweightoutcomesandwellbeingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT frewemma effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthedailymileonchildhoodweightoutcomesandwellbeingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial