Cargando…

Site-specific molecular analysis of the bacteriota on worn spectacles

Regularly touched surfaces are usually contaminated with microorganisms and might be considered as fomites. The same applies for spectacles, but only little is known about their microbial colonization. Previous cultivation-based analyses from our group revealed a bacterial load strongly dominated by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fritz, Birgit, März, Melanie, Weis, Severin, Wahl, Siegfried, Ziemssen, Focke, Egert, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7101307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32221361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62186-6
_version_ 1783511588169318400
author Fritz, Birgit
März, Melanie
Weis, Severin
Wahl, Siegfried
Ziemssen, Focke
Egert, Markus
author_facet Fritz, Birgit
März, Melanie
Weis, Severin
Wahl, Siegfried
Ziemssen, Focke
Egert, Markus
author_sort Fritz, Birgit
collection PubMed
description Regularly touched surfaces are usually contaminated with microorganisms and might be considered as fomites. The same applies for spectacles, but only little is known about their microbial colonization. Previous cultivation-based analyses from our group revealed a bacterial load strongly dominated by staphylococci. To better account for aerotolerant anaerobes, slow growing and yet-uncultivated bacteria, we performed an optimized 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach targeting the V1-V3 region. 30 spectacles were swab-sampled at three sites, each (nosepads, glasses and earclips). We detected 5232 OTUs affiliated with 19 bacterial phyla and 665 genera. Actinobacteria (64%), Proteobacteria (22%), Firmicutes (7%) and Bacteroidetes (5%) were relatively most abundant. At genus level, 13 genera accounted for 84% of the total sequences of all spectacles, having a prevalence of more than 1% relative abundance. Propionibacterium (57%), Corynebacterium (5%), Staphylococcus (4%), Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas and Lawsonella (3%, each) were the dominant genera. Interestingly, bacterial diversity on the glasses was significantly higher compared to nosepads and earclips. Our study represents the first cultivation-independent study of the bacteriota of worn spectacles. Dominated by bacteria of mostly human skin and epithelia origin and clearly including potential pathogens, spectacles may play a role as fomites, especially in clinical environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7101307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71013072020-03-31 Site-specific molecular analysis of the bacteriota on worn spectacles Fritz, Birgit März, Melanie Weis, Severin Wahl, Siegfried Ziemssen, Focke Egert, Markus Sci Rep Article Regularly touched surfaces are usually contaminated with microorganisms and might be considered as fomites. The same applies for spectacles, but only little is known about their microbial colonization. Previous cultivation-based analyses from our group revealed a bacterial load strongly dominated by staphylococci. To better account for aerotolerant anaerobes, slow growing and yet-uncultivated bacteria, we performed an optimized 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach targeting the V1-V3 region. 30 spectacles were swab-sampled at three sites, each (nosepads, glasses and earclips). We detected 5232 OTUs affiliated with 19 bacterial phyla and 665 genera. Actinobacteria (64%), Proteobacteria (22%), Firmicutes (7%) and Bacteroidetes (5%) were relatively most abundant. At genus level, 13 genera accounted for 84% of the total sequences of all spectacles, having a prevalence of more than 1% relative abundance. Propionibacterium (57%), Corynebacterium (5%), Staphylococcus (4%), Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas and Lawsonella (3%, each) were the dominant genera. Interestingly, bacterial diversity on the glasses was significantly higher compared to nosepads and earclips. Our study represents the first cultivation-independent study of the bacteriota of worn spectacles. Dominated by bacteria of mostly human skin and epithelia origin and clearly including potential pathogens, spectacles may play a role as fomites, especially in clinical environments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7101307/ /pubmed/32221361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62186-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Fritz, Birgit
März, Melanie
Weis, Severin
Wahl, Siegfried
Ziemssen, Focke
Egert, Markus
Site-specific molecular analysis of the bacteriota on worn spectacles
title Site-specific molecular analysis of the bacteriota on worn spectacles
title_full Site-specific molecular analysis of the bacteriota on worn spectacles
title_fullStr Site-specific molecular analysis of the bacteriota on worn spectacles
title_full_unstemmed Site-specific molecular analysis of the bacteriota on worn spectacles
title_short Site-specific molecular analysis of the bacteriota on worn spectacles
title_sort site-specific molecular analysis of the bacteriota on worn spectacles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7101307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32221361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62186-6
work_keys_str_mv AT fritzbirgit sitespecificmolecularanalysisofthebacteriotaonwornspectacles
AT marzmelanie sitespecificmolecularanalysisofthebacteriotaonwornspectacles
AT weisseverin sitespecificmolecularanalysisofthebacteriotaonwornspectacles
AT wahlsiegfried sitespecificmolecularanalysisofthebacteriotaonwornspectacles
AT ziemssenfocke sitespecificmolecularanalysisofthebacteriotaonwornspectacles
AT egertmarkus sitespecificmolecularanalysisofthebacteriotaonwornspectacles