Cargando…

Candidemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent critically ill patients: a prospective comparative study

The purpose of this study was to compare the risk factors, clinical manifestations, and outcome of candidemia in immunocompromised (IC) and nonimmunocompromised (NIC) critically ill patients. Data were collected prospectively over a 2-year period (02/2000–01/2002) from patients in a 25-bed, medical–...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dimopoulos, G., Karabinis, A., Samonis, G., Falagas, M. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7101586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17525857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-007-0316-2
_version_ 1783511656347729920
author Dimopoulos, G.
Karabinis, A.
Samonis, G.
Falagas, M. E.
author_facet Dimopoulos, G.
Karabinis, A.
Samonis, G.
Falagas, M. E.
author_sort Dimopoulos, G.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare the risk factors, clinical manifestations, and outcome of candidemia in immunocompromised (IC) and nonimmunocompromised (NIC) critically ill patients. Data were collected prospectively over a 2-year period (02/2000–01/2002) from patients in a 25-bed, medical–surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Eligible for participation in this study were patients who developed candidemia during their ICU stay. Patients under antifungal therapy and with a confirmed systemic fungal infection prior to the diagnosis of candidemia were excluded. Cultures of blood, urine, and stool were performed for all patients in the study, and all patients underwent endoscopy/biopsy of the esophagus for detection of Candida. Smears and/or scrapings of oropharyngeal and esophageal lesions were examined for hyphae and/or pseudohyphae and were also cultured for yeasts. During the study period, 1,627 patients were hospitalized in the ICU, 57% for primary medical reasons and 43% for surgical reasons. After application of the study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 patients with candidemia (9 IC and 15 NIC) were analyzed. Total parenteral nutrition was more common in IC than in NIC patients (9/9 [100%] vs 8/15 [53%], p = 0.02). Oropharyngeal candidiasis was detected in 5 of 9 (55.5%) IC patients and in 1 of 15 (6.5%) NIC patients (p = 0.015). Esophageal candidiasis was also more common in IC than in NIC patients (4/9 [44%] vs 0/15 [0%], p = 0.012). Among the 9 IC patients, all except 2 died, resulting in a crude mortality of 78%; among the 15 NIC patients, 9 died, resulting in a crude mortality of 60% (p > 0.05). Autopsy was performed in two IC and in six NIC patients, with disseminated candidiasis found in one IC patient. Oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis are frequent in IC patients with candidemia. In contrast, this coexistence is rare in NIC critically ill patients with Candida bloodstream infections. A high mortality was noted in both IC and NIC critically ill patients with candidemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7101586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71015862020-03-31 Candidemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent critically ill patients: a prospective comparative study Dimopoulos, G. Karabinis, A. Samonis, G. Falagas, M. E. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Article The purpose of this study was to compare the risk factors, clinical manifestations, and outcome of candidemia in immunocompromised (IC) and nonimmunocompromised (NIC) critically ill patients. Data were collected prospectively over a 2-year period (02/2000–01/2002) from patients in a 25-bed, medical–surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Eligible for participation in this study were patients who developed candidemia during their ICU stay. Patients under antifungal therapy and with a confirmed systemic fungal infection prior to the diagnosis of candidemia were excluded. Cultures of blood, urine, and stool were performed for all patients in the study, and all patients underwent endoscopy/biopsy of the esophagus for detection of Candida. Smears and/or scrapings of oropharyngeal and esophageal lesions were examined for hyphae and/or pseudohyphae and were also cultured for yeasts. During the study period, 1,627 patients were hospitalized in the ICU, 57% for primary medical reasons and 43% for surgical reasons. After application of the study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 patients with candidemia (9 IC and 15 NIC) were analyzed. Total parenteral nutrition was more common in IC than in NIC patients (9/9 [100%] vs 8/15 [53%], p = 0.02). Oropharyngeal candidiasis was detected in 5 of 9 (55.5%) IC patients and in 1 of 15 (6.5%) NIC patients (p = 0.015). Esophageal candidiasis was also more common in IC than in NIC patients (4/9 [44%] vs 0/15 [0%], p = 0.012). Among the 9 IC patients, all except 2 died, resulting in a crude mortality of 78%; among the 15 NIC patients, 9 died, resulting in a crude mortality of 60% (p > 0.05). Autopsy was performed in two IC and in six NIC patients, with disseminated candidiasis found in one IC patient. Oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis are frequent in IC patients with candidemia. In contrast, this coexistence is rare in NIC critically ill patients with Candida bloodstream infections. A high mortality was noted in both IC and NIC critically ill patients with candidemia. Springer-Verlag 2007-05-25 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC7101586/ /pubmed/17525857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-007-0316-2 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2007 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Dimopoulos, G.
Karabinis, A.
Samonis, G.
Falagas, M. E.
Candidemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent critically ill patients: a prospective comparative study
title Candidemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent critically ill patients: a prospective comparative study
title_full Candidemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent critically ill patients: a prospective comparative study
title_fullStr Candidemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent critically ill patients: a prospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Candidemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent critically ill patients: a prospective comparative study
title_short Candidemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent critically ill patients: a prospective comparative study
title_sort candidemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent critically ill patients: a prospective comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7101586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17525857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-007-0316-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dimopoulosg candidemiainimmunocompromisedandimmunocompetentcriticallyillpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT karabinisa candidemiainimmunocompromisedandimmunocompetentcriticallyillpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT samonisg candidemiainimmunocompromisedandimmunocompetentcriticallyillpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT falagasme candidemiainimmunocompromisedandimmunocompetentcriticallyillpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy