Cargando…

The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of tumor deposit (TD) count in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has been rarely evaluated. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic value of TD count and finding out the optimal cutoff point of TD count to differentiate the prognoses of TD-positive CRC patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Kuo, Zheng, Nanxin, Xin, Cheng, Zhou, Leqi, Sun, Ge, Wen, Rongbo, Zhang, Hang, Yu, Guanyu, Bai, Chenguang, Zhang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2052561
_version_ 1783511970787360768
author Zheng, Kuo
Zheng, Nanxin
Xin, Cheng
Zhou, Leqi
Sun, Ge
Wen, Rongbo
Zhang, Hang
Yu, Guanyu
Bai, Chenguang
Zhang, Wei
author_facet Zheng, Kuo
Zheng, Nanxin
Xin, Cheng
Zhou, Leqi
Sun, Ge
Wen, Rongbo
Zhang, Hang
Yu, Guanyu
Bai, Chenguang
Zhang, Wei
author_sort Zheng, Kuo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of tumor deposit (TD) count in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has been rarely evaluated. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic value of TD count and finding out the optimal cutoff point of TD count to differentiate the prognoses of TD-positive CRC patients. METHOD: Patients diagnosed with CRC from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2012, were analyzed. X-tile program was used to identify the optimal cutoff point of TD count in training cohort, and a validation cohort was used to test this cutoff point after propensity score matching (PSM). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk factors of survival. RESULTS: X-tile plots identified 3 (P < 0.001) as the optimal cutoff point of TD count to divide the patients of training cohort into high and low risk subsets in terms of disease-specific survival (DSS). This cutoff point was validated in validation cohort before and after PSM (P < 0.001, P = 0.002). More TD count, which was defined as more than 3, was validated as an independent risk prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: More TD count (TD count ≥ 4) was significantly associated with poor disease-specific survival in CRC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7103057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71030572020-04-02 The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery Zheng, Kuo Zheng, Nanxin Xin, Cheng Zhou, Leqi Sun, Ge Wen, Rongbo Zhang, Hang Yu, Guanyu Bai, Chenguang Zhang, Wei Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of tumor deposit (TD) count in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has been rarely evaluated. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic value of TD count and finding out the optimal cutoff point of TD count to differentiate the prognoses of TD-positive CRC patients. METHOD: Patients diagnosed with CRC from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2012, were analyzed. X-tile program was used to identify the optimal cutoff point of TD count in training cohort, and a validation cohort was used to test this cutoff point after propensity score matching (PSM). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk factors of survival. RESULTS: X-tile plots identified 3 (P < 0.001) as the optimal cutoff point of TD count to divide the patients of training cohort into high and low risk subsets in terms of disease-specific survival (DSS). This cutoff point was validated in validation cohort before and after PSM (P < 0.001, P = 0.002). More TD count, which was defined as more than 3, was validated as an independent risk prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: More TD count (TD count ≥ 4) was significantly associated with poor disease-specific survival in CRC patients. Hindawi 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7103057/ /pubmed/32256564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2052561 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kuo Zheng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zheng, Kuo
Zheng, Nanxin
Xin, Cheng
Zhou, Leqi
Sun, Ge
Wen, Rongbo
Zhang, Hang
Yu, Guanyu
Bai, Chenguang
Zhang, Wei
The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery
title The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery
title_full The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery
title_fullStr The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery
title_short The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery
title_sort prognostic significance of tumor deposit count for colorectal cancer patients after radical surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2052561
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengkuo theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT zhengnanxin theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT xincheng theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT zhouleqi theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT sunge theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT wenrongbo theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT zhanghang theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT yuguanyu theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT baichenguang theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT zhangwei theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT zhengkuo prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT zhengnanxin prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT xincheng prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT zhouleqi prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT sunge prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT wenrongbo prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT zhanghang prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT yuguanyu prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT baichenguang prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery
AT zhangwei prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery