Cargando…
The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery
BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of tumor deposit (TD) count in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has been rarely evaluated. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic value of TD count and finding out the optimal cutoff point of TD count to differentiate the prognoses of TD-positive CRC patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2052561 |
_version_ | 1783511970787360768 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Kuo Zheng, Nanxin Xin, Cheng Zhou, Leqi Sun, Ge Wen, Rongbo Zhang, Hang Yu, Guanyu Bai, Chenguang Zhang, Wei |
author_facet | Zheng, Kuo Zheng, Nanxin Xin, Cheng Zhou, Leqi Sun, Ge Wen, Rongbo Zhang, Hang Yu, Guanyu Bai, Chenguang Zhang, Wei |
author_sort | Zheng, Kuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of tumor deposit (TD) count in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has been rarely evaluated. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic value of TD count and finding out the optimal cutoff point of TD count to differentiate the prognoses of TD-positive CRC patients. METHOD: Patients diagnosed with CRC from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2012, were analyzed. X-tile program was used to identify the optimal cutoff point of TD count in training cohort, and a validation cohort was used to test this cutoff point after propensity score matching (PSM). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk factors of survival. RESULTS: X-tile plots identified 3 (P < 0.001) as the optimal cutoff point of TD count to divide the patients of training cohort into high and low risk subsets in terms of disease-specific survival (DSS). This cutoff point was validated in validation cohort before and after PSM (P < 0.001, P = 0.002). More TD count, which was defined as more than 3, was validated as an independent risk prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: More TD count (TD count ≥ 4) was significantly associated with poor disease-specific survival in CRC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7103057 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71030572020-04-02 The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery Zheng, Kuo Zheng, Nanxin Xin, Cheng Zhou, Leqi Sun, Ge Wen, Rongbo Zhang, Hang Yu, Guanyu Bai, Chenguang Zhang, Wei Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of tumor deposit (TD) count in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has been rarely evaluated. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic value of TD count and finding out the optimal cutoff point of TD count to differentiate the prognoses of TD-positive CRC patients. METHOD: Patients diagnosed with CRC from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2012, were analyzed. X-tile program was used to identify the optimal cutoff point of TD count in training cohort, and a validation cohort was used to test this cutoff point after propensity score matching (PSM). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk factors of survival. RESULTS: X-tile plots identified 3 (P < 0.001) as the optimal cutoff point of TD count to divide the patients of training cohort into high and low risk subsets in terms of disease-specific survival (DSS). This cutoff point was validated in validation cohort before and after PSM (P < 0.001, P = 0.002). More TD count, which was defined as more than 3, was validated as an independent risk prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: More TD count (TD count ≥ 4) was significantly associated with poor disease-specific survival in CRC patients. Hindawi 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7103057/ /pubmed/32256564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2052561 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kuo Zheng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zheng, Kuo Zheng, Nanxin Xin, Cheng Zhou, Leqi Sun, Ge Wen, Rongbo Zhang, Hang Yu, Guanyu Bai, Chenguang Zhang, Wei The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery |
title | The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery |
title_full | The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery |
title_fullStr | The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery |
title_short | The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery |
title_sort | prognostic significance of tumor deposit count for colorectal cancer patients after radical surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2052561 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengkuo theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT zhengnanxin theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT xincheng theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT zhouleqi theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT sunge theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT wenrongbo theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT zhanghang theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT yuguanyu theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT baichenguang theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT zhangwei theprognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT zhengkuo prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT zhengnanxin prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT xincheng prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT zhouleqi prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT sunge prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT wenrongbo prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT zhanghang prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT yuguanyu prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT baichenguang prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery AT zhangwei prognosticsignificanceoftumordepositcountforcolorectalcancerpatientsafterradicalsurgery |