Cargando…

mHealth technology for ecological momentary assessment in physical activity research: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the publications on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) relating to physical activity (PA) behavior in order to classify the methodologies, and to identify the main mHealth technology-based tools and procedures that have been applied during the first 10 years si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zapata-Lamana, Rafael, Lalanza, Jaume F., Losilla, Josep-Maria, Parrado, Eva, Capdevila, Lluis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32257648
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8848
_version_ 1783512007601815552
author Zapata-Lamana, Rafael
Lalanza, Jaume F.
Losilla, Josep-Maria
Parrado, Eva
Capdevila, Lluis
author_facet Zapata-Lamana, Rafael
Lalanza, Jaume F.
Losilla, Josep-Maria
Parrado, Eva
Capdevila, Lluis
author_sort Zapata-Lamana, Rafael
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the publications on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) relating to physical activity (PA) behavior in order to classify the methodologies, and to identify the main mHealth technology-based tools and procedures that have been applied during the first 10 years since the emergence of smartphones. As a result of this review, we want to ask if there is enough evidence to propose the use of the term “mEMA” (mobile-based EMA). DESIGN: A systematic review according to PRISMA Statement (PROSPERO registration: CRD42018088136). METHOD: Four databases (PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science Core Collection) were searched electronically from 2008 to February 2018. RESULTS: A total of 76 studies from 297 potential articles on the use of EMA and PA were included in this review. It was found that 71% of studies specifically used “EMA” for assessing PA behaviors but the rest used other terminology that also adjusted to the inclusion criteria. Just over half (51.3%) of studies (39) used mHealth technology, mainly smartphones, for collecting EMA data. The majority (79.5%) of these studies (31 out of 39) were published during the last 4 years. On the other hand, 58.8% of studies that only used paper-and-pencil were published during the first 3 years of the 10-year period analyzed. An accelerometer was the main built-in sensor used for collecting PA behavior by means of mHealth (69%). Most of the studies were carried out on young-adult samples, with only three studies in older adults. Women were included in 60% of studies, and healthy people in 82%. The studies lasted between 1 and 7 days in 57.9%, and between three and seven assessments per day were carried out in 37%. The most popular topics evaluated together with PA were psychological state and social and environmental context. CONCLUSIONS: We have classified the EMA methodologies used for assessing PA behaviors. A total of 71% of studies used the term “EMA” and 51.3% used mHealth technology. Accelerometers have been the main built-in sensor used for collecting PA. The change of trend in the use of tools for EMA in PA coincides with the technological advances of the last decade due to the emergence of smartphones and mHealth technology. There is enough evidence to use the term mEMA when mHealth technology is being used for monitoring real-time lifestyle behaviors in natural situations. We define mEMA as the use of mobile computing and communication technologies for the EMA of health and lifestyle behaviors. It is clear that the use of mHealth is increasing, but there is still a lot to be gained from taking advantage of all the capabilities of this technology in order to apply EMA to PA behavior. Thus, mEMA methodology can help in the monitoring of healthy lifestyles under both subjective and objective perspectives. The tendency for future research should be the automatic recognition of the PA of the user without interrupting their behavior. The ecological information could be completed with voice messages, image captures or brief text selections on the touch screen made in real time, all managed through smartphone apps. This methodology could be extended when EMA combined with mHealth are used to evaluate other lifestyle behaviors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7103204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71032042020-04-01 mHealth technology for ecological momentary assessment in physical activity research: a systematic review Zapata-Lamana, Rafael Lalanza, Jaume F. Losilla, Josep-Maria Parrado, Eva Capdevila, Lluis PeerJ Kinesiology OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the publications on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) relating to physical activity (PA) behavior in order to classify the methodologies, and to identify the main mHealth technology-based tools and procedures that have been applied during the first 10 years since the emergence of smartphones. As a result of this review, we want to ask if there is enough evidence to propose the use of the term “mEMA” (mobile-based EMA). DESIGN: A systematic review according to PRISMA Statement (PROSPERO registration: CRD42018088136). METHOD: Four databases (PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science Core Collection) were searched electronically from 2008 to February 2018. RESULTS: A total of 76 studies from 297 potential articles on the use of EMA and PA were included in this review. It was found that 71% of studies specifically used “EMA” for assessing PA behaviors but the rest used other terminology that also adjusted to the inclusion criteria. Just over half (51.3%) of studies (39) used mHealth technology, mainly smartphones, for collecting EMA data. The majority (79.5%) of these studies (31 out of 39) were published during the last 4 years. On the other hand, 58.8% of studies that only used paper-and-pencil were published during the first 3 years of the 10-year period analyzed. An accelerometer was the main built-in sensor used for collecting PA behavior by means of mHealth (69%). Most of the studies were carried out on young-adult samples, with only three studies in older adults. Women were included in 60% of studies, and healthy people in 82%. The studies lasted between 1 and 7 days in 57.9%, and between three and seven assessments per day were carried out in 37%. The most popular topics evaluated together with PA were psychological state and social and environmental context. CONCLUSIONS: We have classified the EMA methodologies used for assessing PA behaviors. A total of 71% of studies used the term “EMA” and 51.3% used mHealth technology. Accelerometers have been the main built-in sensor used for collecting PA. The change of trend in the use of tools for EMA in PA coincides with the technological advances of the last decade due to the emergence of smartphones and mHealth technology. There is enough evidence to use the term mEMA when mHealth technology is being used for monitoring real-time lifestyle behaviors in natural situations. We define mEMA as the use of mobile computing and communication technologies for the EMA of health and lifestyle behaviors. It is clear that the use of mHealth is increasing, but there is still a lot to be gained from taking advantage of all the capabilities of this technology in order to apply EMA to PA behavior. Thus, mEMA methodology can help in the monitoring of healthy lifestyles under both subjective and objective perspectives. The tendency for future research should be the automatic recognition of the PA of the user without interrupting their behavior. The ecological information could be completed with voice messages, image captures or brief text selections on the touch screen made in real time, all managed through smartphone apps. This methodology could be extended when EMA combined with mHealth are used to evaluate other lifestyle behaviors. PeerJ Inc. 2020-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7103204/ /pubmed/32257648 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8848 Text en © 2020 Zapata-Lamana et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Kinesiology
Zapata-Lamana, Rafael
Lalanza, Jaume F.
Losilla, Josep-Maria
Parrado, Eva
Capdevila, Lluis
mHealth technology for ecological momentary assessment in physical activity research: a systematic review
title mHealth technology for ecological momentary assessment in physical activity research: a systematic review
title_full mHealth technology for ecological momentary assessment in physical activity research: a systematic review
title_fullStr mHealth technology for ecological momentary assessment in physical activity research: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed mHealth technology for ecological momentary assessment in physical activity research: a systematic review
title_short mHealth technology for ecological momentary assessment in physical activity research: a systematic review
title_sort mhealth technology for ecological momentary assessment in physical activity research: a systematic review
topic Kinesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32257648
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8848
work_keys_str_mv AT zapatalamanarafael mhealthtechnologyforecologicalmomentaryassessmentinphysicalactivityresearchasystematicreview
AT lalanzajaumef mhealthtechnologyforecologicalmomentaryassessmentinphysicalactivityresearchasystematicreview
AT losillajosepmaria mhealthtechnologyforecologicalmomentaryassessmentinphysicalactivityresearchasystematicreview
AT parradoeva mhealthtechnologyforecologicalmomentaryassessmentinphysicalactivityresearchasystematicreview
AT capdevilalluis mhealthtechnologyforecologicalmomentaryassessmentinphysicalactivityresearchasystematicreview