Cargando…

Salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases and malignant tumors. A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Saliva evaluation could be a possible alternative to blood and/or tissue analyses, for researching specific molecules associated to the presence of systemic diseases and malignancies. The present systematic review has been designed in order to answer to the question “are there significan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meleti, Marco, Cassi, Diana, Vescovi, Paolo, Setti, Giacomo, Pertinhez, Thelma A., Pezzi, Margherita Eleonora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32040469
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23355
_version_ 1783512059921563648
author Meleti, Marco
Cassi, Diana
Vescovi, Paolo
Setti, Giacomo
Pertinhez, Thelma A.
Pezzi, Margherita Eleonora
author_facet Meleti, Marco
Cassi, Diana
Vescovi, Paolo
Setti, Giacomo
Pertinhez, Thelma A.
Pezzi, Margherita Eleonora
author_sort Meleti, Marco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Saliva evaluation could be a possible alternative to blood and/or tissue analyses, for researching specific molecules associated to the presence of systemic diseases and malignancies. The present systematic review has been designed in order to answer to the question “are there significant associations between specific salivary biomarkers and diagnosis of systemic diseases or malignancies?”. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was used to guide the review. The combinations of “saliva” and “systemic diseases” or “diagnosis” or “biomarkers” or “cancers” or “carcinoma” or “tumors”, were used to search Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Endpoint of research has been set at May 2019. Studies were classified into 3 groups according to the type of disease investigated for diagnosis: 1) malignant tumors; 2) neurologic diseases and 3) inflammatory/metabolic/cardiovascular diseases. Assessment of quality has been assigned according to a series of questions proposed by the National Institute of Health. Level of evidence was assessed using the categories proposed in the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based medicine (CEMB) levels for diagnosis (2011). RESULTS: Seventy-nine studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifty-one (64%) investigated malignant tumors, 14 (17.5%) neurologic and 14 (18.5%) inflammatory/cardiovascular/metabolic diseases. Among studies investigating malignant tumors, 12 (23.5%) were scored as “good” and 11 of these reported statistically significant associations between salivary molecules and pathology. Two and 5 studies were found to have a good quality, among those evaluating the association between salivary biomarkers and neurologic and inflammatory/metabolic/cardiovascular diseases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present systematic review confirms the existence of some “good” quality evidence to support the role of peculiar salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases (e.g. lung cancer and EGFR). Key words:Salivary diagnostics, biomarkers, systemic diseases, malignant tumors, early diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7103445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71034452020-04-02 Salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases and malignant tumors. A systematic review Meleti, Marco Cassi, Diana Vescovi, Paolo Setti, Giacomo Pertinhez, Thelma A. Pezzi, Margherita Eleonora Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review BACKGROUND: Saliva evaluation could be a possible alternative to blood and/or tissue analyses, for researching specific molecules associated to the presence of systemic diseases and malignancies. The present systematic review has been designed in order to answer to the question “are there significant associations between specific salivary biomarkers and diagnosis of systemic diseases or malignancies?”. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was used to guide the review. The combinations of “saliva” and “systemic diseases” or “diagnosis” or “biomarkers” or “cancers” or “carcinoma” or “tumors”, were used to search Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Endpoint of research has been set at May 2019. Studies were classified into 3 groups according to the type of disease investigated for diagnosis: 1) malignant tumors; 2) neurologic diseases and 3) inflammatory/metabolic/cardiovascular diseases. Assessment of quality has been assigned according to a series of questions proposed by the National Institute of Health. Level of evidence was assessed using the categories proposed in the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based medicine (CEMB) levels for diagnosis (2011). RESULTS: Seventy-nine studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifty-one (64%) investigated malignant tumors, 14 (17.5%) neurologic and 14 (18.5%) inflammatory/cardiovascular/metabolic diseases. Among studies investigating malignant tumors, 12 (23.5%) were scored as “good” and 11 of these reported statistically significant associations between salivary molecules and pathology. Two and 5 studies were found to have a good quality, among those evaluating the association between salivary biomarkers and neurologic and inflammatory/metabolic/cardiovascular diseases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present systematic review confirms the existence of some “good” quality evidence to support the role of peculiar salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases (e.g. lung cancer and EGFR). Key words:Salivary diagnostics, biomarkers, systemic diseases, malignant tumors, early diagnosis. Medicina Oral S.L. 2020-03 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7103445/ /pubmed/32040469 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23355 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Meleti, Marco
Cassi, Diana
Vescovi, Paolo
Setti, Giacomo
Pertinhez, Thelma A.
Pezzi, Margherita Eleonora
Salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases and malignant tumors. A systematic review
title Salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases and malignant tumors. A systematic review
title_full Salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases and malignant tumors. A systematic review
title_fullStr Salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases and malignant tumors. A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases and malignant tumors. A systematic review
title_short Salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases and malignant tumors. A systematic review
title_sort salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases and malignant tumors. a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32040469
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23355
work_keys_str_mv AT meletimarco salivarybiomarkersfordiagnosisofsystemicdiseasesandmalignanttumorsasystematicreview
AT cassidiana salivarybiomarkersfordiagnosisofsystemicdiseasesandmalignanttumorsasystematicreview
AT vescovipaolo salivarybiomarkersfordiagnosisofsystemicdiseasesandmalignanttumorsasystematicreview
AT settigiacomo salivarybiomarkersfordiagnosisofsystemicdiseasesandmalignanttumorsasystematicreview
AT pertinhezthelmaa salivarybiomarkersfordiagnosisofsystemicdiseasesandmalignanttumorsasystematicreview
AT pezzimargheritaeleonora salivarybiomarkersfordiagnosisofsystemicdiseasesandmalignanttumorsasystematicreview