Cargando…
Patient perception of anticoagulant treatment for stroke prevention (RE-SONANCE study)
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated atrial fibrillation (AF) patients’ perceptions of anticoagulation treatment with dabigatran or a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for stroke prevention, according to accepted indications. METHODS: The RE-SONANCE observational, prospective, multicentre, international study used the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32257246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001202 |
_version_ | 1783512115520208896 |
---|---|
author | Vinereanu, Dragos Napalkov, Dmitry Bergler-Klein, Jutta Benczur, Bela Ciernik, Martin Gotcheva, Nina Medvedchikov, Alexey Põder, Pentti Simic, Dragan Skride, Andris Tang, Wenbo Trusz-Gluza, Maria Vesely, Jiri Vishnepolsky, Tatiana Vrabec, Mirej |
author_facet | Vinereanu, Dragos Napalkov, Dmitry Bergler-Klein, Jutta Benczur, Bela Ciernik, Martin Gotcheva, Nina Medvedchikov, Alexey Põder, Pentti Simic, Dragan Skride, Andris Tang, Wenbo Trusz-Gluza, Maria Vesely, Jiri Vishnepolsky, Tatiana Vrabec, Mirej |
author_sort | Vinereanu, Dragos |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We evaluated atrial fibrillation (AF) patients’ perceptions of anticoagulation treatment with dabigatran or a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for stroke prevention, according to accepted indications. METHODS: The RE-SONANCE observational, prospective, multicentre, international study used the validated Perception on Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q) to assess patients with AF already taking a VKA who were switched to dabigatran (cohort A), and newly diagnosed patients initiated on either dabigatran or a VKA (cohort B). Visit 1 (V1) was at baseline, and visit 2 (V2) and visit 3 (V3) were at 30–45 and 150–210 days after baseline, respectively. Primary outcomes were treatment satisfaction and convenience in cohort A at V2 and V3 versus baseline, and in cohort B for dabigatran and a VKA at V2 and V3. RESULTS: The main analysis set comprised 4100 patients in cohort A and 5365 in cohort B (dabigatran: 3179; VKA: 2186). In cohort A, PACT-Q2 improved significantly (p<0.001 for all) for treatment convenience (mean change V1 vs V2=20.72; SD=21.50; V1 vs V3=24.54; SD=22.85) and treatment satisfaction (mean change V1 vs V2=17.60; SD=18.76; V1 vs V3=21.04; SD=20.24). In cohort B, mean PACT-Q2 scores at V2 and V3 were significantly higher (p<0.001 for all) for dabigatran versus a VKA for treatment convenience (V2=18.38; SE =0.51; V3=23.34; SE=0.51) and satisfaction (V2=15.88; SE=0.39; V3=19.01; SE=0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to dabigatran from long-term VKA therapy or newly initiated dabigatran is associated with improved patient treatment convenience and satisfaction compared with VKA therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7103803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71038032020-03-31 Patient perception of anticoagulant treatment for stroke prevention (RE-SONANCE study) Vinereanu, Dragos Napalkov, Dmitry Bergler-Klein, Jutta Benczur, Bela Ciernik, Martin Gotcheva, Nina Medvedchikov, Alexey Põder, Pentti Simic, Dragan Skride, Andris Tang, Wenbo Trusz-Gluza, Maria Vesely, Jiri Vishnepolsky, Tatiana Vrabec, Mirej Open Heart Arrhythmias and Sudden Death OBJECTIVE: We evaluated atrial fibrillation (AF) patients’ perceptions of anticoagulation treatment with dabigatran or a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for stroke prevention, according to accepted indications. METHODS: The RE-SONANCE observational, prospective, multicentre, international study used the validated Perception on Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q) to assess patients with AF already taking a VKA who were switched to dabigatran (cohort A), and newly diagnosed patients initiated on either dabigatran or a VKA (cohort B). Visit 1 (V1) was at baseline, and visit 2 (V2) and visit 3 (V3) were at 30–45 and 150–210 days after baseline, respectively. Primary outcomes were treatment satisfaction and convenience in cohort A at V2 and V3 versus baseline, and in cohort B for dabigatran and a VKA at V2 and V3. RESULTS: The main analysis set comprised 4100 patients in cohort A and 5365 in cohort B (dabigatran: 3179; VKA: 2186). In cohort A, PACT-Q2 improved significantly (p<0.001 for all) for treatment convenience (mean change V1 vs V2=20.72; SD=21.50; V1 vs V3=24.54; SD=22.85) and treatment satisfaction (mean change V1 vs V2=17.60; SD=18.76; V1 vs V3=21.04; SD=20.24). In cohort B, mean PACT-Q2 scores at V2 and V3 were significantly higher (p<0.001 for all) for dabigatran versus a VKA for treatment convenience (V2=18.38; SE =0.51; V3=23.34; SE=0.51) and satisfaction (V2=15.88; SE=0.39; V3=19.01; SE=0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to dabigatran from long-term VKA therapy or newly initiated dabigatran is associated with improved patient treatment convenience and satisfaction compared with VKA therapy. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7103803/ /pubmed/32257246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001202 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Arrhythmias and Sudden Death Vinereanu, Dragos Napalkov, Dmitry Bergler-Klein, Jutta Benczur, Bela Ciernik, Martin Gotcheva, Nina Medvedchikov, Alexey Põder, Pentti Simic, Dragan Skride, Andris Tang, Wenbo Trusz-Gluza, Maria Vesely, Jiri Vishnepolsky, Tatiana Vrabec, Mirej Patient perception of anticoagulant treatment for stroke prevention (RE-SONANCE study) |
title | Patient perception of anticoagulant treatment for stroke prevention (RE-SONANCE study) |
title_full | Patient perception of anticoagulant treatment for stroke prevention (RE-SONANCE study) |
title_fullStr | Patient perception of anticoagulant treatment for stroke prevention (RE-SONANCE study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient perception of anticoagulant treatment for stroke prevention (RE-SONANCE study) |
title_short | Patient perception of anticoagulant treatment for stroke prevention (RE-SONANCE study) |
title_sort | patient perception of anticoagulant treatment for stroke prevention (re-sonance study) |
topic | Arrhythmias and Sudden Death |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7103803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32257246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vinereanudragos patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT napalkovdmitry patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT berglerkleinjutta patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT benczurbela patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT ciernikmartin patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT gotchevanina patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT medvedchikovalexey patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT poderpentti patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT simicdragan patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT skrideandris patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT tangwenbo patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT truszgluzamaria patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT veselyjiri patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT vishnepolskytatiana patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy AT vrabecmirej patientperceptionofanticoagulanttreatmentforstrokepreventionresonancestudy |