Cargando…

1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the benefit of the Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) in children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Methods: We studied 22 children supported by NIV, aged 1 month to 15 years. The duration of the study was 4 years (January 2006- Dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tassiou, I, Papazoglou, K, Patsoura, A, Papadatos, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104461/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1203/00006450-201011001-01347
_version_ 1783512238688043008
author Tassiou, I
Papazoglou, K
Patsoura, A
Papadatos, J
author_facet Tassiou, I
Papazoglou, K
Patsoura, A
Papadatos, J
author_sort Tassiou, I
collection PubMed
description Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the benefit of the Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) in children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Methods: We studied 22 children supported by NIV, aged 1 month to 15 years. The duration of the study was 4 years (January 2006- December 2009). The total number of admissions to ICU during this period was 759 (2,9% supported by NIV). The causes of the respiratory failure in these children supported by NIV were: chronic diseases-infection (n=11; 50%), neuromuscular diseases (n=4; 18,18%), renal transplantations-immunosuppression (n=3; 13,63%), leukemias (n=2; 9,09%), respiratory infections (n=2; 9,09%). We selected the Biphasic Ventilation mode (Bi-Vent) by facial mask, because our patients were in severe respiratory distress. The parameters in this mode were as follow: PIP: 10-16 cmH2O and PEEP 6-12 cmH2O. The mean duration of NIV was 4 days (3 hours to 14 days). Results: Facial mask was well tolerated and with no injuries from her use. Results showed that 19 patients (86,36%) recovered and 3 patients (13,63%) died because of their underlying disease and not from the respiratory failure. Two of our patients continued the NIV ventilation as home care treatment. Conclusions: NIV support of respiratory failure is a very useful tool in the pediatric intensivists' hands because it is good alternative to mechanical ventilation. It is well tolerated, reduces the need of sedation and the PICU stay in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7104461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71044612020-03-31 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Tassiou, I Papazoglou, K Patsoura, A Papadatos, J Pediatr Res Article Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the benefit of the Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) in children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Methods: We studied 22 children supported by NIV, aged 1 month to 15 years. The duration of the study was 4 years (January 2006- December 2009). The total number of admissions to ICU during this period was 759 (2,9% supported by NIV). The causes of the respiratory failure in these children supported by NIV were: chronic diseases-infection (n=11; 50%), neuromuscular diseases (n=4; 18,18%), renal transplantations-immunosuppression (n=3; 13,63%), leukemias (n=2; 9,09%), respiratory infections (n=2; 9,09%). We selected the Biphasic Ventilation mode (Bi-Vent) by facial mask, because our patients were in severe respiratory distress. The parameters in this mode were as follow: PIP: 10-16 cmH2O and PEEP 6-12 cmH2O. The mean duration of NIV was 4 days (3 hours to 14 days). Results: Facial mask was well tolerated and with no injuries from her use. Results showed that 19 patients (86,36%) recovered and 3 patients (13,63%) died because of their underlying disease and not from the respiratory failure. Two of our patients continued the NIV ventilation as home care treatment. Conclusions: NIV support of respiratory failure is a very useful tool in the pediatric intensivists' hands because it is good alternative to mechanical ventilation. It is well tolerated, reduces the need of sedation and the PICU stay in these patients. Nature Publishing Group US 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC7104461/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1203/00006450-201011001-01347 Text en © International Pediatrics Research Foundation, Inc. 2010 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Tassiou, I
Papazoglou, K
Patsoura, A
Papadatos, J
1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
title 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
title_full 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
title_short 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
title_sort 1347 non invasive ventilation in pediatric intensive care unit
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104461/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1203/00006450-201011001-01347
work_keys_str_mv AT tassioui 1347noninvasiveventilationinpediatricintensivecareunit
AT papazoglouk 1347noninvasiveventilationinpediatricintensivecareunit
AT patsouraa 1347noninvasiveventilationinpediatricintensivecareunit
AT papadatosj 1347noninvasiveventilationinpediatricintensivecareunit