Cargando…
1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the benefit of the Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) in children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Methods: We studied 22 children supported by NIV, aged 1 month to 15 years. The duration of the study was 4 years (January 2006- Dec...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104461/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1203/00006450-201011001-01347 |
_version_ | 1783512238688043008 |
---|---|
author | Tassiou, I Papazoglou, K Patsoura, A Papadatos, J |
author_facet | Tassiou, I Papazoglou, K Patsoura, A Papadatos, J |
author_sort | Tassiou, I |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the benefit of the Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) in children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Methods: We studied 22 children supported by NIV, aged 1 month to 15 years. The duration of the study was 4 years (January 2006- December 2009). The total number of admissions to ICU during this period was 759 (2,9% supported by NIV). The causes of the respiratory failure in these children supported by NIV were: chronic diseases-infection (n=11; 50%), neuromuscular diseases (n=4; 18,18%), renal transplantations-immunosuppression (n=3; 13,63%), leukemias (n=2; 9,09%), respiratory infections (n=2; 9,09%). We selected the Biphasic Ventilation mode (Bi-Vent) by facial mask, because our patients were in severe respiratory distress. The parameters in this mode were as follow: PIP: 10-16 cmH2O and PEEP 6-12 cmH2O. The mean duration of NIV was 4 days (3 hours to 14 days). Results: Facial mask was well tolerated and with no injuries from her use. Results showed that 19 patients (86,36%) recovered and 3 patients (13,63%) died because of their underlying disease and not from the respiratory failure. Two of our patients continued the NIV ventilation as home care treatment. Conclusions: NIV support of respiratory failure is a very useful tool in the pediatric intensivists' hands because it is good alternative to mechanical ventilation. It is well tolerated, reduces the need of sedation and the PICU stay in these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7104461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71044612020-03-31 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Tassiou, I Papazoglou, K Patsoura, A Papadatos, J Pediatr Res Article Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the benefit of the Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) in children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Methods: We studied 22 children supported by NIV, aged 1 month to 15 years. The duration of the study was 4 years (January 2006- December 2009). The total number of admissions to ICU during this period was 759 (2,9% supported by NIV). The causes of the respiratory failure in these children supported by NIV were: chronic diseases-infection (n=11; 50%), neuromuscular diseases (n=4; 18,18%), renal transplantations-immunosuppression (n=3; 13,63%), leukemias (n=2; 9,09%), respiratory infections (n=2; 9,09%). We selected the Biphasic Ventilation mode (Bi-Vent) by facial mask, because our patients were in severe respiratory distress. The parameters in this mode were as follow: PIP: 10-16 cmH2O and PEEP 6-12 cmH2O. The mean duration of NIV was 4 days (3 hours to 14 days). Results: Facial mask was well tolerated and with no injuries from her use. Results showed that 19 patients (86,36%) recovered and 3 patients (13,63%) died because of their underlying disease and not from the respiratory failure. Two of our patients continued the NIV ventilation as home care treatment. Conclusions: NIV support of respiratory failure is a very useful tool in the pediatric intensivists' hands because it is good alternative to mechanical ventilation. It is well tolerated, reduces the need of sedation and the PICU stay in these patients. Nature Publishing Group US 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC7104461/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1203/00006450-201011001-01347 Text en © International Pediatrics Research Foundation, Inc. 2010 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Tassiou, I Papazoglou, K Patsoura, A Papadatos, J 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title | 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title_full | 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title_fullStr | 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title_full_unstemmed | 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title_short | 1347 Non Invasive Ventilation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit |
title_sort | 1347 non invasive ventilation in pediatric intensive care unit |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104461/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1203/00006450-201011001-01347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tassioui 1347noninvasiveventilationinpediatricintensivecareunit AT papazoglouk 1347noninvasiveventilationinpediatricintensivecareunit AT patsouraa 1347noninvasiveventilationinpediatricintensivecareunit AT papadatosj 1347noninvasiveventilationinpediatricintensivecareunit |