Cargando…
Sex differences in bone density, geometry, and bone strength of competitive soccer players
OBJECTIVES: To examine sex differences in bone characteristics in competitive soccer players. METHODS: 43 soccer players (male, n=23; female, n=20), and 43 matched controls (males, n=23; females, n=20), completed the study. Areal BMD (aBMD) of the total body, lumbar spine, and dual femur and tibiae...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131370 |
_version_ | 1783512266415538176 |
---|---|
author | Baker, Breanne S. Chen, Zhaojing Larson, Rebecca D. Bemben, Michael G. Bemben, Debra A. |
author_facet | Baker, Breanne S. Chen, Zhaojing Larson, Rebecca D. Bemben, Michael G. Bemben, Debra A. |
author_sort | Baker, Breanne S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To examine sex differences in bone characteristics in competitive soccer players. METHODS: 43 soccer players (male, n=23; female, n=20), and 43 matched controls (males, n=23; females, n=20), completed the study. Areal BMD (aBMD) of the total body, lumbar spine, and dual femur and tibiae volumetric BMD (vBMD), bone geometry, and bone strength variables (pQCT) were measured. Bone-specific physical activity and training history were assessed. RESULTS: Male soccer players had significantly greater (p≤0.05) total body and hip aBMD, hip strength indices and 4% and 38% tibia variables than females. Regression analyses determined that BFLBM, not sex, was the strongest predictor of bone variables. Female soccer players exhibited significantly greater percent differences from controls for tibiae variables than males (p≤0.05). Soccer players had greater aBMD and hip strength indices than controls (p≤0.040). Soccer-specific asymmetries were found for 38% total area (2.1%) and pSSI (3.8%), favoring the non-dominant leg (both p≤0.017). CONCLUSION: Bone characteristics adjusted for body size were greater in male versus female soccer players. However, body composition variables were more important predictors of bone characteristics than sex. There were no sex differences in the magnitude of limb asymmetries, suggesting skeletal responsiveness to mechanical loading was similar in males and females. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7104578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71045782020-04-02 Sex differences in bone density, geometry, and bone strength of competitive soccer players Baker, Breanne S. Chen, Zhaojing Larson, Rebecca D. Bemben, Michael G. Bemben, Debra A. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Original Article OBJECTIVES: To examine sex differences in bone characteristics in competitive soccer players. METHODS: 43 soccer players (male, n=23; female, n=20), and 43 matched controls (males, n=23; females, n=20), completed the study. Areal BMD (aBMD) of the total body, lumbar spine, and dual femur and tibiae volumetric BMD (vBMD), bone geometry, and bone strength variables (pQCT) were measured. Bone-specific physical activity and training history were assessed. RESULTS: Male soccer players had significantly greater (p≤0.05) total body and hip aBMD, hip strength indices and 4% and 38% tibia variables than females. Regression analyses determined that BFLBM, not sex, was the strongest predictor of bone variables. Female soccer players exhibited significantly greater percent differences from controls for tibiae variables than males (p≤0.05). Soccer players had greater aBMD and hip strength indices than controls (p≤0.040). Soccer-specific asymmetries were found for 38% total area (2.1%) and pSSI (3.8%), favoring the non-dominant leg (both p≤0.017). CONCLUSION: Bone characteristics adjusted for body size were greater in male versus female soccer players. However, body composition variables were more important predictors of bone characteristics than sex. There were no sex differences in the magnitude of limb asymmetries, suggesting skeletal responsiveness to mechanical loading was similar in males and females. International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7104578/ /pubmed/32131370 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Baker, Breanne S. Chen, Zhaojing Larson, Rebecca D. Bemben, Michael G. Bemben, Debra A. Sex differences in bone density, geometry, and bone strength of competitive soccer players |
title | Sex differences in bone density, geometry, and bone strength of competitive soccer players |
title_full | Sex differences in bone density, geometry, and bone strength of competitive soccer players |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in bone density, geometry, and bone strength of competitive soccer players |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in bone density, geometry, and bone strength of competitive soccer players |
title_short | Sex differences in bone density, geometry, and bone strength of competitive soccer players |
title_sort | sex differences in bone density, geometry, and bone strength of competitive soccer players |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131370 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakerbreannes sexdifferencesinbonedensitygeometryandbonestrengthofcompetitivesoccerplayers AT chenzhaojing sexdifferencesinbonedensitygeometryandbonestrengthofcompetitivesoccerplayers AT larsonrebeccad sexdifferencesinbonedensitygeometryandbonestrengthofcompetitivesoccerplayers AT bembenmichaelg sexdifferencesinbonedensitygeometryandbonestrengthofcompetitivesoccerplayers AT bembendebraa sexdifferencesinbonedensitygeometryandbonestrengthofcompetitivesoccerplayers |