Cargando…
Reasoning in the valuation of health‐related quality of life: A qualitative content analysis of deliberations in a pilot study
BACKGROUND: Group deliberation can be a pathway to understanding reasons behind judgement decisions. This pilot study implemented a deliberative process to elicit public values about health‐related quality of life. In this study, participants deliberated scales and weights for a German adaption of t...
Autores principales: | Gansen, Fabia, Klinger, Julian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31868289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13011 |
Ejemplares similares
-
MCDA-based deliberation to value health states: lessons learned from a pilot study
por: Gansen, Fabia, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Understanding the valuation of paediatric health-related quality of life: a qualitative study protocol
por: Yu, Alice, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language
por: Jensen Mækelæ, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Correction: Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language
por: Mækelæ, Martin Jensen, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Health economic evaluations based on routine data in Germany: a systematic review
por: Gansen, Fabia Mareike
Publicado: (2018)