Cargando…
Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review
BACKGROUND: Patient and public engagement in paediatric health‐care decision making is under‐researched, and there is a lack of systematically reviewed literature in this area. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent, range and nature of published research investigating the engagement of children/youth, fa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13017 |
_version_ | 1783512284886204416 |
---|---|
author | Gurung, Gagan Richardson, Amy Wyeth, Emma Edmonds, Liza Derrett, Sarah |
author_facet | Gurung, Gagan Richardson, Amy Wyeth, Emma Edmonds, Liza Derrett, Sarah |
author_sort | Gurung, Gagan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient and public engagement in paediatric health‐care decision making is under‐researched, and there is a lack of systematically reviewed literature in this area. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent, range and nature of published research investigating the engagement of children/youth, families and the public in paediatric service improvement, to summarize key aspects of the research identified and to identify gaps to help inform future research needs. METHODS: Literature was sought in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Eligible articles presented research focused on patient, family and public engagement strategies in the paediatric health‐care setting. Two reviewers extracted and charted data and analysed findings using a descriptive numerical summary analysis and a thematic analysis. RESULTS: From 4331 articles, 21 were eligible. Most were from the United States. The majority of studies were undertaken in hospital settings and used quantitative methods. Various patient and public engagement strategies/interventions were examined, including shared decision‐making tools, questionnaires, youth councils/family advisory groups, patient portals and online networks. Most of the studies examined child/youth/parent satisfaction, with fewer investigating treatment outcomes or service improvement. The majority of studies investigated an engagement strategy at the ‘individual treatment’ level of engagement. Regarding the continuum of engagement, most of the studies were at either the ‘consultation’ or ‘involvement’ stage. CONCLUSION: Future research needs to focus on the investigation of engagement strategies delivered in primary care, and the use of more qualitative and mixed methods approaches is recommended. There is a gap in the area of engagement strategies directed towards ‘service design and resources’ and ‘macro/policy’ levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7104655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71046552020-04-01 Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review Gurung, Gagan Richardson, Amy Wyeth, Emma Edmonds, Liza Derrett, Sarah Health Expect Review Article BACKGROUND: Patient and public engagement in paediatric health‐care decision making is under‐researched, and there is a lack of systematically reviewed literature in this area. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent, range and nature of published research investigating the engagement of children/youth, families and the public in paediatric service improvement, to summarize key aspects of the research identified and to identify gaps to help inform future research needs. METHODS: Literature was sought in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Eligible articles presented research focused on patient, family and public engagement strategies in the paediatric health‐care setting. Two reviewers extracted and charted data and analysed findings using a descriptive numerical summary analysis and a thematic analysis. RESULTS: From 4331 articles, 21 were eligible. Most were from the United States. The majority of studies were undertaken in hospital settings and used quantitative methods. Various patient and public engagement strategies/interventions were examined, including shared decision‐making tools, questionnaires, youth councils/family advisory groups, patient portals and online networks. Most of the studies examined child/youth/parent satisfaction, with fewer investigating treatment outcomes or service improvement. The majority of studies investigated an engagement strategy at the ‘individual treatment’ level of engagement. Regarding the continuum of engagement, most of the studies were at either the ‘consultation’ or ‘involvement’ stage. CONCLUSION: Future research needs to focus on the investigation of engagement strategies delivered in primary care, and the use of more qualitative and mixed methods approaches is recommended. There is a gap in the area of engagement strategies directed towards ‘service design and resources’ and ‘macro/policy’ levels. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-24 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7104655/ /pubmed/31981295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13017 Text en © 2019 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Gurung, Gagan Richardson, Amy Wyeth, Emma Edmonds, Liza Derrett, Sarah Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review |
title | Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review |
title_full | Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review |
title_fullStr | Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review |
title_short | Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review |
title_sort | child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: a systematic scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gurunggagan childyouthfamilyandpublicengagementinpaediatricservicesinhighincomecountriesasystematicscopingreview AT richardsonamy childyouthfamilyandpublicengagementinpaediatricservicesinhighincomecountriesasystematicscopingreview AT wyethemma childyouthfamilyandpublicengagementinpaediatricservicesinhighincomecountriesasystematicscopingreview AT edmondsliza childyouthfamilyandpublicengagementinpaediatricservicesinhighincomecountriesasystematicscopingreview AT derrettsarah childyouthfamilyandpublicengagementinpaediatricservicesinhighincomecountriesasystematicscopingreview |