Cargando…

Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND: Patient and public engagement in paediatric health‐care decision making is under‐researched, and there is a lack of systematically reviewed literature in this area. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent, range and nature of published research investigating the engagement of children/youth, fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurung, Gagan, Richardson, Amy, Wyeth, Emma, Edmonds, Liza, Derrett, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13017
_version_ 1783512284886204416
author Gurung, Gagan
Richardson, Amy
Wyeth, Emma
Edmonds, Liza
Derrett, Sarah
author_facet Gurung, Gagan
Richardson, Amy
Wyeth, Emma
Edmonds, Liza
Derrett, Sarah
author_sort Gurung, Gagan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient and public engagement in paediatric health‐care decision making is under‐researched, and there is a lack of systematically reviewed literature in this area. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent, range and nature of published research investigating the engagement of children/youth, families and the public in paediatric service improvement, to summarize key aspects of the research identified and to identify gaps to help inform future research needs. METHODS: Literature was sought in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Eligible articles presented research focused on patient, family and public engagement strategies in the paediatric health‐care setting. Two reviewers extracted and charted data and analysed findings using a descriptive numerical summary analysis and a thematic analysis. RESULTS: From 4331 articles, 21 were eligible. Most were from the United States. The majority of studies were undertaken in hospital settings and used quantitative methods. Various patient and public engagement strategies/interventions were examined, including shared decision‐making tools, questionnaires, youth councils/family advisory groups, patient portals and online networks. Most of the studies examined child/youth/parent satisfaction, with fewer investigating treatment outcomes or service improvement. The majority of studies investigated an engagement strategy at the ‘individual treatment’ level of engagement. Regarding the continuum of engagement, most of the studies were at either the ‘consultation’ or ‘involvement’ stage. CONCLUSION: Future research needs to focus on the investigation of engagement strategies delivered in primary care, and the use of more qualitative and mixed methods approaches is recommended. There is a gap in the area of engagement strategies directed towards ‘service design and resources’ and ‘macro/policy’ levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7104655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71046552020-04-01 Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review Gurung, Gagan Richardson, Amy Wyeth, Emma Edmonds, Liza Derrett, Sarah Health Expect Review Article BACKGROUND: Patient and public engagement in paediatric health‐care decision making is under‐researched, and there is a lack of systematically reviewed literature in this area. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent, range and nature of published research investigating the engagement of children/youth, families and the public in paediatric service improvement, to summarize key aspects of the research identified and to identify gaps to help inform future research needs. METHODS: Literature was sought in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Eligible articles presented research focused on patient, family and public engagement strategies in the paediatric health‐care setting. Two reviewers extracted and charted data and analysed findings using a descriptive numerical summary analysis and a thematic analysis. RESULTS: From 4331 articles, 21 were eligible. Most were from the United States. The majority of studies were undertaken in hospital settings and used quantitative methods. Various patient and public engagement strategies/interventions were examined, including shared decision‐making tools, questionnaires, youth councils/family advisory groups, patient portals and online networks. Most of the studies examined child/youth/parent satisfaction, with fewer investigating treatment outcomes or service improvement. The majority of studies investigated an engagement strategy at the ‘individual treatment’ level of engagement. Regarding the continuum of engagement, most of the studies were at either the ‘consultation’ or ‘involvement’ stage. CONCLUSION: Future research needs to focus on the investigation of engagement strategies delivered in primary care, and the use of more qualitative and mixed methods approaches is recommended. There is a gap in the area of engagement strategies directed towards ‘service design and resources’ and ‘macro/policy’ levels. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-24 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7104655/ /pubmed/31981295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13017 Text en © 2019 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Gurung, Gagan
Richardson, Amy
Wyeth, Emma
Edmonds, Liza
Derrett, Sarah
Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review
title Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review
title_full Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review
title_fullStr Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review
title_short Child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: A systematic scoping review
title_sort child/youth, family and public engagement in paediatric services in high‐income countries: a systematic scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13017
work_keys_str_mv AT gurunggagan childyouthfamilyandpublicengagementinpaediatricservicesinhighincomecountriesasystematicscopingreview
AT richardsonamy childyouthfamilyandpublicengagementinpaediatricservicesinhighincomecountriesasystematicscopingreview
AT wyethemma childyouthfamilyandpublicengagementinpaediatricservicesinhighincomecountriesasystematicscopingreview
AT edmondsliza childyouthfamilyandpublicengagementinpaediatricservicesinhighincomecountriesasystematicscopingreview
AT derrettsarah childyouthfamilyandpublicengagementinpaediatricservicesinhighincomecountriesasystematicscopingreview