Cargando…

Good pharmacy practice assessment among community pharmacies in Lebanon

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess good pharmacy practice (GPP) aspects and compare GPP scores among community pharmacies in Lebanon, using a tool developed jointly by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to improve and maintain standards of pha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badro, Danielle A., Sacre, Hala, Hallit, Souheil, Amhaz, Ali, Salameh., Pascale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256898
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1745
_version_ 1783512296521203712
author Badro, Danielle A.
Sacre, Hala
Hallit, Souheil
Amhaz, Ali
Salameh., Pascale
author_facet Badro, Danielle A.
Sacre, Hala
Hallit, Souheil
Amhaz, Ali
Salameh., Pascale
author_sort Badro, Danielle A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess good pharmacy practice (GPP) aspects and compare GPP scores among community pharmacies in Lebanon, using a tool developed jointly by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to improve and maintain standards of pharmacy practice. METHODS: Data collection was carried out between July and October 2018 by a team of 10 licensed inspectors who work at the Lebanese Order of Pharmacists (OPL) and visited community pharmacies across Lebanon. The questionnaire was adapted to the Lebanese context and included 109 questions organized under five sections: socio-demographics, Indicator A (data management and data recording), Indicator B (services and health promotion), Indicator C (dispensing, preparation and administration of medicines), and Indicator D (storage and facilities). The value of 75% was considered as the cutoff point for adherence to indicators. RESULTS: Out of 276 pharmacies visited, a total of 250 (90.58%) pharmacists participated in the study with one pharmacist being interviewed in every pharmacy. Results showed that 18.8% of pharmacists were generally adherents to GPP guidelines (scores above the 75% cutoff): 23.3% were adherent to indicator A, 21.6% to indicator B, 14.8% to indicator C and 13.2% to indicator D. Moreover, comparison of GPP scores across geographical regions revealed a higher adherence among community pharmacists working in the Beirut region compared to the North region, the South region, Mount Lebanon, and the Bekaa. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that community pharmacists in Lebanon do not fulfill GPP criteria set by FIP/WHO, and that this poor adherence is a trend across the country’s geographical regions. Therefore, efforts should be made to raise awareness among pharmacists about the necessity to adhere to GPP guidelines and standards, and train them and support them appropriately to reach that goal. This is the first indicator-based comprehensive pilot assessment to evaluate GPP adherence in community pharmacies across Lebanon. Working on the optimization of this assessment tool is also warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7104797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71047972020-04-06 Good pharmacy practice assessment among community pharmacies in Lebanon Badro, Danielle A. Sacre, Hala Hallit, Souheil Amhaz, Ali Salameh., Pascale Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess good pharmacy practice (GPP) aspects and compare GPP scores among community pharmacies in Lebanon, using a tool developed jointly by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to improve and maintain standards of pharmacy practice. METHODS: Data collection was carried out between July and October 2018 by a team of 10 licensed inspectors who work at the Lebanese Order of Pharmacists (OPL) and visited community pharmacies across Lebanon. The questionnaire was adapted to the Lebanese context and included 109 questions organized under five sections: socio-demographics, Indicator A (data management and data recording), Indicator B (services and health promotion), Indicator C (dispensing, preparation and administration of medicines), and Indicator D (storage and facilities). The value of 75% was considered as the cutoff point for adherence to indicators. RESULTS: Out of 276 pharmacies visited, a total of 250 (90.58%) pharmacists participated in the study with one pharmacist being interviewed in every pharmacy. Results showed that 18.8% of pharmacists were generally adherents to GPP guidelines (scores above the 75% cutoff): 23.3% were adherent to indicator A, 21.6% to indicator B, 14.8% to indicator C and 13.2% to indicator D. Moreover, comparison of GPP scores across geographical regions revealed a higher adherence among community pharmacists working in the Beirut region compared to the North region, the South region, Mount Lebanon, and the Bekaa. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that community pharmacists in Lebanon do not fulfill GPP criteria set by FIP/WHO, and that this poor adherence is a trend across the country’s geographical regions. Therefore, efforts should be made to raise awareness among pharmacists about the necessity to adhere to GPP guidelines and standards, and train them and support them appropriately to reach that goal. This is the first indicator-based comprehensive pilot assessment to evaluate GPP adherence in community pharmacies across Lebanon. Working on the optimization of this assessment tool is also warranted. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2020 2020-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7104797/ /pubmed/32256898 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1745 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Badro, Danielle A.
Sacre, Hala
Hallit, Souheil
Amhaz, Ali
Salameh., Pascale
Good pharmacy practice assessment among community pharmacies in Lebanon
title Good pharmacy practice assessment among community pharmacies in Lebanon
title_full Good pharmacy practice assessment among community pharmacies in Lebanon
title_fullStr Good pharmacy practice assessment among community pharmacies in Lebanon
title_full_unstemmed Good pharmacy practice assessment among community pharmacies in Lebanon
title_short Good pharmacy practice assessment among community pharmacies in Lebanon
title_sort good pharmacy practice assessment among community pharmacies in lebanon
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256898
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1745
work_keys_str_mv AT badrodaniellea goodpharmacypracticeassessmentamongcommunitypharmaciesinlebanon
AT sacrehala goodpharmacypracticeassessmentamongcommunitypharmaciesinlebanon
AT hallitsouheil goodpharmacypracticeassessmentamongcommunitypharmaciesinlebanon
AT amhazali goodpharmacypracticeassessmentamongcommunitypharmaciesinlebanon
AT salamehpascale goodpharmacypracticeassessmentamongcommunitypharmaciesinlebanon