Cargando…
Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative
The European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM requires member states of the European Union to ensure justification and optimisation of the radiological procedures and to include information on patient exposure as part of the report of the examinations. The EuroSafe Imaging campaign of the European Society...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7105556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32232684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00859-6 |
_version_ | 1783512422498172928 |
---|---|
author | Vano, Eliseo Frija, Guy Stiller, Wolfram Efstathopoulos, Efstathios Granata, Claudio Loose, Reinhard Paulo, Graciano Pekarovic, Dean Sjöberg, Johan Donoso-Bach, Lluís |
author_facet | Vano, Eliseo Frija, Guy Stiller, Wolfram Efstathopoulos, Efstathios Granata, Claudio Loose, Reinhard Paulo, Graciano Pekarovic, Dean Sjöberg, Johan Donoso-Bach, Lluís |
author_sort | Vano, Eliseo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM requires member states of the European Union to ensure justification and optimisation of the radiological procedures and to include information on patient exposure as part of the report of the examinations. The EuroSafe Imaging campaign of the European Society of Radiology created a working group (WG) on “Dosimetry for imaging in clinical practice” with the aim to help with the dosimetry aspects required by European and national regulations. The primary focus topics were selected and a survey among the experts of the WG, allowed suggesting some initial consensus approaches. For information on patient exposure, it was agreed to include the dosimetric values reported by the imaging modalities (validated by a medical physics expert). It was also suggested to prepare educational material on dosimetric quantities for patients. Individual optimisation was considered a challenge, especially for interventional procedures. In these cases, patient and occupational doses should be part of the global optimisation process and trigger levels should be defined to avoid skin radiation injuries. Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) always need to be considered for comparison with periodic patient dose audits. In the case of accidental or unintended exposures, a report should be produced for the Quality Assurance programme, together with an educational note to avoid the repetition of incidents. Dose registry and management systems should allow fulfilling the regulatory requirements of national and European regulations. In a second step, and after the initial experience with the Directive implementation, a wider survey will be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7105556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71055562020-04-06 Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative Vano, Eliseo Frija, Guy Stiller, Wolfram Efstathopoulos, Efstathios Granata, Claudio Loose, Reinhard Paulo, Graciano Pekarovic, Dean Sjöberg, Johan Donoso-Bach, Lluís Insights Imaging Statement The European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM requires member states of the European Union to ensure justification and optimisation of the radiological procedures and to include information on patient exposure as part of the report of the examinations. The EuroSafe Imaging campaign of the European Society of Radiology created a working group (WG) on “Dosimetry for imaging in clinical practice” with the aim to help with the dosimetry aspects required by European and national regulations. The primary focus topics were selected and a survey among the experts of the WG, allowed suggesting some initial consensus approaches. For information on patient exposure, it was agreed to include the dosimetric values reported by the imaging modalities (validated by a medical physics expert). It was also suggested to prepare educational material on dosimetric quantities for patients. Individual optimisation was considered a challenge, especially for interventional procedures. In these cases, patient and occupational doses should be part of the global optimisation process and trigger levels should be defined to avoid skin radiation injuries. Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) always need to be considered for comparison with periodic patient dose audits. In the case of accidental or unintended exposures, a report should be produced for the Quality Assurance programme, together with an educational note to avoid the repetition of incidents. Dose registry and management systems should allow fulfilling the regulatory requirements of national and European regulations. In a second step, and after the initial experience with the Directive implementation, a wider survey will be considered. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7105556/ /pubmed/32232684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00859-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Statement Vano, Eliseo Frija, Guy Stiller, Wolfram Efstathopoulos, Efstathios Granata, Claudio Loose, Reinhard Paulo, Graciano Pekarovic, Dean Sjöberg, Johan Donoso-Bach, Lluís Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative |
title | Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative |
title_full | Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative |
title_fullStr | Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative |
title_full_unstemmed | Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative |
title_short | Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative |
title_sort | harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the esr eurosafe imaging initiative |
topic | Statement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7105556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32232684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00859-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanoeliseo harmonisationofimagingdosimetryinclinicalpracticepracticalapproachesandguidancefromtheesreurosafeimaginginitiative AT frijaguy harmonisationofimagingdosimetryinclinicalpracticepracticalapproachesandguidancefromtheesreurosafeimaginginitiative AT stillerwolfram harmonisationofimagingdosimetryinclinicalpracticepracticalapproachesandguidancefromtheesreurosafeimaginginitiative AT efstathopoulosefstathios harmonisationofimagingdosimetryinclinicalpracticepracticalapproachesandguidancefromtheesreurosafeimaginginitiative AT granataclaudio harmonisationofimagingdosimetryinclinicalpracticepracticalapproachesandguidancefromtheesreurosafeimaginginitiative AT loosereinhard harmonisationofimagingdosimetryinclinicalpracticepracticalapproachesandguidancefromtheesreurosafeimaginginitiative AT paulograciano harmonisationofimagingdosimetryinclinicalpracticepracticalapproachesandguidancefromtheesreurosafeimaginginitiative AT pekarovicdean harmonisationofimagingdosimetryinclinicalpracticepracticalapproachesandguidancefromtheesreurosafeimaginginitiative AT sjobergjohan harmonisationofimagingdosimetryinclinicalpracticepracticalapproachesandguidancefromtheesreurosafeimaginginitiative AT donosobachlluis harmonisationofimagingdosimetryinclinicalpracticepracticalapproachesandguidancefromtheesreurosafeimaginginitiative AT harmonisationofimagingdosimetryinclinicalpracticepracticalapproachesandguidancefromtheesreurosafeimaginginitiative |