Studies on acceptance, evaluation and impact of the Cologne program “Research and Medical Studies”

Introduction: The curricular implementation of events (or programs) for science-related training in human medicine has been on the agenda of the medical faculties since the publication of the Federal-State Working Group [1]. The Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne developed and established a systematic, longitudinal science curriculum together with the start of the model curriculum in human medicine in 2003. Here, we investigate the questions of whether the described (para-) curricular elements are accepted by students and lecturers and how they are evaluated, especially by students. In addition, we investigate whether selected parameters can be used to demonstrate changes in the students' scientific activities. Project description: The program “Research and Medical Studies” (RaMS) consists of several components: these elements of the mandatory curricular (Scientific Projects, SP) and optional components (Research in Medical Studies (RiMS), Research Track (RT), Research Fair Cologne (RFC)) are described here. Results were recorded at various levels: 1. Likert Scale evaluation of the event’s elements were collected as satisfaction parameters from the students. 2. Process data on participation in the voluntary events were collected and evaluated as absolute and relational figures (WS 12/13-SS 17). . 3. Data on the outcome of the RaMS program were collected: Type of scientific projects in the academic years 2011/12-2014/15), number and type of available projects offered at the RFC (in the years 2011-18) and number of student research funding applications in a comparison of the periods 2010-13 vs. 2014-17). . Results: The students’ acceptance of mandatory and paracurricular courses of the RaMS program is pleasingly high, which is not surprising, at least in the case of the voluntary courses. The participation of students in RiMS, RT and RFC is satisfactory for voluntary courses. In the case of the RT, with certified participation of approximately 47% of all registrations (corresponding to 10% of the total cohort), this is comparable to similar programs. It can be shown that the number of experimental science projects has more than doubled over time in parallel with the development of RaMS. The average number of provided projects according to the RFC is 42 (which corresponds to a placement rate of approx. 1:4). The number of successful student applications for a research support grant during the period the measures were implemented has doubled. Discussion and conclusion: The RaMS program shows a route for the implementation of the SP required by the next licensing regulations in medical education, which was initially supported and expanded solitarily, later by further elements (RiMS), also in the sense of a science-based career development (RT, RFC). The student acceptance and the measured success, in the form of successful participation in the Research Track, increased choice of experimental projects, significant increase of submitted as well as approved research grants and the high project placement rate of the Research Fair, encourage the further development of the program, which is indicated in the conclusion.