Cargando…

Segment IV approach for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Although achieving the critical view of safety (CVS) is useful for avoiding vasculobiliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the CVS cannot always be achieved in cases of severe cholecystitis because of technical difficulties. Herein, we focused on segment IV of the liver and its diag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitamura, Hiroaki, Fujioka, Shuichi, Hata, Taigo, Misawa, Takeyuki, Yanaga, Katsuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7105843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32258983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12297
_version_ 1783512486689898496
author Kitamura, Hiroaki
Fujioka, Shuichi
Hata, Taigo
Misawa, Takeyuki
Yanaga, Katsuhiko
author_facet Kitamura, Hiroaki
Fujioka, Shuichi
Hata, Taigo
Misawa, Takeyuki
Yanaga, Katsuhiko
author_sort Kitamura, Hiroaki
collection PubMed
description Although achieving the critical view of safety (CVS) is useful for avoiding vasculobiliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the CVS cannot always be achieved in cases of severe cholecystitis because of technical difficulties. Herein, we focused on segment IV of the liver and its diagonal line (D‐line) as a feasible landmark for carrying out difficult LC. The D‐line connects the right dorsal and left ventral corners of segment IV and is used as the vectoral landmark, which is where the gallbladder is first dissected to achieve CVS without misidentification. Conversion to subtotal cholecystectomy along the D‐line is also feasible when gallbladder wall scarring is severe. We named this procedure the segment IV approach for LC. Sixty‐two consecutive difficult LC (including 27 scheduled LC after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage [PTGBD] and 35 conservatively treated cases of Tokyo Guidelines [TG] grade II cholecystitis) were managed by the segment IV approach. Successful gallbladder extraction along the D‐line was achieved in 44 (71%) cases; all of these cases also achieved CVS following total cholecystectomy. The other 18 (29%) cases were converted to subtotal cholecystectomy because gallbladder extraction along the D‐line failed as a result of severe cholecystitis with inflammatory adhesion with surrounding structures. Median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 135 (range, 54‐290) min and 10 (range, 0‐100) mL, respectively. No intra‐ or postoperative complications were observed. The segment IV approach is feasible for achieving CVS and for considering subtotal cholecystectomy in difficult LC cases where scarring of the gallbladder wall is present.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7105843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71058432020-04-01 Segment IV approach for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy Kitamura, Hiroaki Fujioka, Shuichi Hata, Taigo Misawa, Takeyuki Yanaga, Katsuhiko Ann Gastroenterol Surg How I Do It Although achieving the critical view of safety (CVS) is useful for avoiding vasculobiliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the CVS cannot always be achieved in cases of severe cholecystitis because of technical difficulties. Herein, we focused on segment IV of the liver and its diagonal line (D‐line) as a feasible landmark for carrying out difficult LC. The D‐line connects the right dorsal and left ventral corners of segment IV and is used as the vectoral landmark, which is where the gallbladder is first dissected to achieve CVS without misidentification. Conversion to subtotal cholecystectomy along the D‐line is also feasible when gallbladder wall scarring is severe. We named this procedure the segment IV approach for LC. Sixty‐two consecutive difficult LC (including 27 scheduled LC after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage [PTGBD] and 35 conservatively treated cases of Tokyo Guidelines [TG] grade II cholecystitis) were managed by the segment IV approach. Successful gallbladder extraction along the D‐line was achieved in 44 (71%) cases; all of these cases also achieved CVS following total cholecystectomy. The other 18 (29%) cases were converted to subtotal cholecystectomy because gallbladder extraction along the D‐line failed as a result of severe cholecystitis with inflammatory adhesion with surrounding structures. Median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 135 (range, 54‐290) min and 10 (range, 0‐100) mL, respectively. No intra‐ or postoperative complications were observed. The segment IV approach is feasible for achieving CVS and for considering subtotal cholecystectomy in difficult LC cases where scarring of the gallbladder wall is present. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7105843/ /pubmed/32258983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12297 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle How I Do It
Kitamura, Hiroaki
Fujioka, Shuichi
Hata, Taigo
Misawa, Takeyuki
Yanaga, Katsuhiko
Segment IV approach for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title Segment IV approach for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full Segment IV approach for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Segment IV approach for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Segment IV approach for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_short Segment IV approach for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_sort segment iv approach for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy
topic How I Do It
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7105843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32258983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12297
work_keys_str_mv AT kitamurahiroaki segmentivapproachfordifficultlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT fujiokashuichi segmentivapproachfordifficultlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT hatataigo segmentivapproachfordifficultlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT misawatakeyuki segmentivapproachfordifficultlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT yanagakatsuhiko segmentivapproachfordifficultlaparoscopiccholecystectomy