Cargando…

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia

AIM: A few studies comparing laparoscopic and open techniques have reported that open repair with mesh is the optimal operation for unilateral primary hernia. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) versus open mesh plug repair (MP)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takayama, Yuichi, Kaneoka, Yuji, Maeda, Atsuyuki, Takahashi, Takamasa, Uji, Masahito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7105845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32258981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12314
_version_ 1783512487146029056
author Takayama, Yuichi
Kaneoka, Yuji
Maeda, Atsuyuki
Takahashi, Takamasa
Uji, Masahito
author_facet Takayama, Yuichi
Kaneoka, Yuji
Maeda, Atsuyuki
Takahashi, Takamasa
Uji, Masahito
author_sort Takayama, Yuichi
collection PubMed
description AIM: A few studies comparing laparoscopic and open techniques have reported that open repair with mesh is the optimal operation for unilateral primary hernia. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) versus open mesh plug repair (MP) for bilateral primary inguinal hernia. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 107 patients with bilateral primary inguinal hernia between January 2008 and December 2016. Of these patients, 49 underwent TAPP and 58 underwent MP. The surgical outcomes and the long‐term outcomes using a questionnaire were compared between TAPP and MP. RESULTS: In the TAPP group, the operation time was significantly longer (103 vs 91 minutes; P = .019). The postoperative complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups. One patient (1.0%) in the TAPP group and five patients (4.3%) in the MP group suffered recurrence (P = .30). Postoperative groin pain was not significantly different (14% in the TAPP group vs 31% in the MP group; P = .065), but more patients required analgesics in the MP group (4.1% vs 17%; P = .036). The long‐term outcomes, according to a questionnaire, were not significantly different between the two groups. The median follow‐up period was 22 (range, 0.4‐52) months in the TAPP group and 40 (range, 0.5‐108) months in the MP group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: TAPP for bilateral primary inguinal hernia achieved better results than MP relative to postoperative pain and the use of medication for pain relief without increasing the complication and recurrence rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7105845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71058452020-04-01 Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia Takayama, Yuichi Kaneoka, Yuji Maeda, Atsuyuki Takahashi, Takamasa Uji, Masahito Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: A few studies comparing laparoscopic and open techniques have reported that open repair with mesh is the optimal operation for unilateral primary hernia. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) versus open mesh plug repair (MP) for bilateral primary inguinal hernia. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 107 patients with bilateral primary inguinal hernia between January 2008 and December 2016. Of these patients, 49 underwent TAPP and 58 underwent MP. The surgical outcomes and the long‐term outcomes using a questionnaire were compared between TAPP and MP. RESULTS: In the TAPP group, the operation time was significantly longer (103 vs 91 minutes; P = .019). The postoperative complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups. One patient (1.0%) in the TAPP group and five patients (4.3%) in the MP group suffered recurrence (P = .30). Postoperative groin pain was not significantly different (14% in the TAPP group vs 31% in the MP group; P = .065), but more patients required analgesics in the MP group (4.1% vs 17%; P = .036). The long‐term outcomes, according to a questionnaire, were not significantly different between the two groups. The median follow‐up period was 22 (range, 0.4‐52) months in the TAPP group and 40 (range, 0.5‐108) months in the MP group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: TAPP for bilateral primary inguinal hernia achieved better results than MP relative to postoperative pain and the use of medication for pain relief without increasing the complication and recurrence rates. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7105845/ /pubmed/32258981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12314 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Takayama, Yuichi
Kaneoka, Yuji
Maeda, Atsuyuki
Takahashi, Takamasa
Uji, Masahito
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia
title Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia
title_full Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia
title_fullStr Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia
title_short Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia
title_sort laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7105845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32258981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12314
work_keys_str_mv AT takayamayuichi laparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairversusopenmeshplugrepairforbilateralprimaryinguinalhernia
AT kaneokayuji laparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairversusopenmeshplugrepairforbilateralprimaryinguinalhernia
AT maedaatsuyuki laparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairversusopenmeshplugrepairforbilateralprimaryinguinalhernia
AT takahashitakamasa laparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairversusopenmeshplugrepairforbilateralprimaryinguinalhernia
AT ujimasahito laparoscopictransabdominalpreperitonealrepairversusopenmeshplugrepairforbilateralprimaryinguinalhernia