Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of a multi-parameter customized respiratory TaqMan(®) array card compared to conventional methods in immunocompromised patients

BACKGROUND: Respiratory viral infections can cause significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Conventional tests routinely available at most institutions are limited by the number of detectable pathogens, by a poor sensitivity and/or a long turnaround time. OBJECTIVES: To com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steensels, Deborah, Reynders, Marijke, Descheemaeker, Patrick, Curran, Martin D., Jacobs, Frédérique, Denis, Olivier, Delforge, Marie-Luce, Montesinos, Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7106552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26364158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2015.08.022
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Respiratory viral infections can cause significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Conventional tests routinely available at most institutions are limited by the number of detectable pathogens, by a poor sensitivity and/or a long turnaround time. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of routine conventional testing with direct fluorescent antibody assays and viral culture to a customized TaqMan® array card (TAC) real-time PCR method, targeting 24 viruses, 8 bacteria and 2 fungi simultaneously. STUDY DESIGN: We collected 143 respiratory samples from 120 symptomatic immunocompromised patients. Samples for which conventional and TAC results were discordant underwent further verification testing. RESULTS: The TAC assay identified viral pathogens in more samples than did conventional testing (77/143 versus 27/143; McNemar P < 0.0001), even when TAC results for viruses that could not be detected by conventional testing were excluded from analysis (59/143 versus 26/143; P < 0.0001). In addition, the TAC assay identified 18 samples with non-viral pathogens. Verification testing confirmed positive TAC results for 50 out of 55 samples for which conventional testing was negative. Two out of three samples with a positive conventional test but negative TAC result were confirmed positive. A viral and a total pathogen co-infection rate of 5.6% and 11.8% were found, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The customized TAC assay resulted in a significantly increased identification of respiratory viruses. This study provides a practical real-life assessment of the performance of the TAC assay in a population for whom rapid and accurate diagnosis of viral and atypical pathogens is crucial for appropriate clinical management.