Cargando…
Local and regional temporal trends (2013–2019) of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence in the USA
BACKGROUND: In the USA, there are several Ehrlichia spp. of concern including Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia ewingii, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia muris eauclarensis, and “Panola Mountain Ehrlichia”. Of these, E. canis is considered the most clinically relevant for domestic dogs, with infection capa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7106614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32228712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04022-4 |
_version_ | 1783512644291919872 |
---|---|
author | Gettings, Jenna R. Self, Stella C. W. McMahan, Christopher S. Brown, D. Andrew Nordone, Shila K. Yabsley, Michael J. |
author_facet | Gettings, Jenna R. Self, Stella C. W. McMahan, Christopher S. Brown, D. Andrew Nordone, Shila K. Yabsley, Michael J. |
author_sort | Gettings, Jenna R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the USA, there are several Ehrlichia spp. of concern including Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia ewingii, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia muris eauclarensis, and “Panola Mountain Ehrlichia”. Of these, E. canis is considered the most clinically relevant for domestic dogs, with infection capable of causing acute, subclinical, and chronic stages of disease. Changes in climate, land use, habitats, and wildlife reservoir populations, and increasing contact between both human and dog populations with natural areas have resulted in the increased risk of vector-borne disease throughout the world. METHODS: A Bayesian spatio-temporal binomial regression model was applied to serological test results collected from veterinarians throughout the contiguous USA between January 2013 and November 2019. The model was used to quantify both regional and local temporal trends of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence and identify areas that experienced significant increases in seroprevalence. RESULTS: Regionally, increasing seroprevalence occurred within several states throughout the central and southeastern states, including Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia and Texas. The underlying local trends revealed increasing seroprevalence at a finer scale. Clusters of locally increasing seroprevalence were seen from the western Appalachian region into the southern Midwest, along the Atlantic coast in New England, parts of Florida, Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota, and in a couple areas of the Mountain region. Clusters of locally decreasing seroprevalence were seen throughout the USA including New York and the mid-Atlantic states, Texas, the Midwest, and California. CONCLUSIONS: Canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence is increasing in both endemic and non-endemic areas of the USA. The findings from this study indicate that dogs across a wide area of the USA are at risk of exposure and these results should provide veterinarians and pet owners with the information they need to make informed decisions about prevention of tick exposure. [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7106614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71066142020-04-01 Local and regional temporal trends (2013–2019) of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence in the USA Gettings, Jenna R. Self, Stella C. W. McMahan, Christopher S. Brown, D. Andrew Nordone, Shila K. Yabsley, Michael J. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: In the USA, there are several Ehrlichia spp. of concern including Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia ewingii, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia muris eauclarensis, and “Panola Mountain Ehrlichia”. Of these, E. canis is considered the most clinically relevant for domestic dogs, with infection capable of causing acute, subclinical, and chronic stages of disease. Changes in climate, land use, habitats, and wildlife reservoir populations, and increasing contact between both human and dog populations with natural areas have resulted in the increased risk of vector-borne disease throughout the world. METHODS: A Bayesian spatio-temporal binomial regression model was applied to serological test results collected from veterinarians throughout the contiguous USA between January 2013 and November 2019. The model was used to quantify both regional and local temporal trends of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence and identify areas that experienced significant increases in seroprevalence. RESULTS: Regionally, increasing seroprevalence occurred within several states throughout the central and southeastern states, including Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia and Texas. The underlying local trends revealed increasing seroprevalence at a finer scale. Clusters of locally increasing seroprevalence were seen from the western Appalachian region into the southern Midwest, along the Atlantic coast in New England, parts of Florida, Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota, and in a couple areas of the Mountain region. Clusters of locally decreasing seroprevalence were seen throughout the USA including New York and the mid-Atlantic states, Texas, the Midwest, and California. CONCLUSIONS: Canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence is increasing in both endemic and non-endemic areas of the USA. The findings from this study indicate that dogs across a wide area of the USA are at risk of exposure and these results should provide veterinarians and pet owners with the information they need to make informed decisions about prevention of tick exposure. [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7106614/ /pubmed/32228712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04022-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Gettings, Jenna R. Self, Stella C. W. McMahan, Christopher S. Brown, D. Andrew Nordone, Shila K. Yabsley, Michael J. Local and regional temporal trends (2013–2019) of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence in the USA |
title | Local and regional temporal trends (2013–2019) of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence in the USA |
title_full | Local and regional temporal trends (2013–2019) of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence in the USA |
title_fullStr | Local and regional temporal trends (2013–2019) of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence in the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | Local and regional temporal trends (2013–2019) of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence in the USA |
title_short | Local and regional temporal trends (2013–2019) of canine Ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence in the USA |
title_sort | local and regional temporal trends (2013–2019) of canine ehrlichia spp. seroprevalence in the usa |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7106614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32228712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04022-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gettingsjennar localandregionaltemporaltrends20132019ofcanineehrlichiasppseroprevalenceintheusa AT selfstellacw localandregionaltemporaltrends20132019ofcanineehrlichiasppseroprevalenceintheusa AT mcmahanchristophers localandregionaltemporaltrends20132019ofcanineehrlichiasppseroprevalenceintheusa AT browndandrew localandregionaltemporaltrends20132019ofcanineehrlichiasppseroprevalenceintheusa AT nordoneshilak localandregionaltemporaltrends20132019ofcanineehrlichiasppseroprevalenceintheusa AT yabsleymichaelj localandregionaltemporaltrends20132019ofcanineehrlichiasppseroprevalenceintheusa |