Cargando…

Navigating the NIH Public Access Policy for Peer-Reviewed Manuscripts - Why and How to get a PMCID Number

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Liston, Robin, Barohn, Richard J.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	University of Kansas Medical Center 2020
Materias:	Commentary
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7106990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256971

Ejemplares similares

Schizophrenia Bulletin and the Revised NIH Public Access Policy
por: Shepard, Paul D.
Publicado: (2008)

The NIH public access policy did not harm biomedical journals
por: Peterson, A. Townsend, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The NIH policy on enhancing public access to publications resulting from NIH-funded research: Can we streamline the process for our authors?
por: Rossner, Mike
Publicado: (2005)

Public Access and Use of Health Research: An Exploratory Study of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Access Policy Using Interviews and Surveys of Health Personnel
por: O'Keeffe, Jamie, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Sample Size and Precision in NIH Peer Review
por: Kaplan, David, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

The Publishers' Pushback against NIH's Public Access and Scholarly Publishing Sustainability
por: Willinsky, John
Publicado: (2009)

Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores
por: Lindner, Mark D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The NIH Open Citation Collection: A public access, broad coverage resource
por: Hutchins, B. Ian, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Correction: Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores
Publicado: (2015)

NIH Peer Review: Scored Review Criteria and Overall Impact
por: Lindner, Mark D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
por: Femia, Elia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Two changes that may help to improve NIH peer review
por: Aslin, Richard N.
Publicado: (2022)

NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity
por: Fang, Ferric C, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

DEMYSTIFYING NIH PEER REVIEW: YOUR APPLICATION FROM SUBMISSION TO SCORE
por: Ortenberg, Elia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Editorial: Why was my manuscript rejected?
Publicado: (2011)

Why Do Manuscripts Get Rejected? A Content Analysis of Rejection Reports from the Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
por: Menon, Vikas, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Association of publication record and independent NIH funding
por: Michelson, Kenneth A.
Publicado: (2022)

The Peer Review Process: Underwriting Manuscript Quality & Validity
por: Santini, Ario
Publicado: (2018)

An overview of innovations in the external peer review of journal manuscripts.
por: Woods, Helen Buckley, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Inventing the NIH: Federal Biomedical Research Policy, 1887-1937
por: Louis, Elan D.
Publicado: (1986)

Inventing the NIH: federal biomedical research policy, 1887–1937
por: Warner, John Harley
Publicado: (1988)

Selecting manuscript for publication
por: Kim, Seong-Gon
Publicado: (2016)

Open Access As Public Policy
por: Gass, Andy
Publicado: (2004)

The purpose of peer review in the case of an open-access publication
por: Alexandrov, Georgii A
Publicado: (2006)

Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol)
por: Galipeau, James, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Peer Review of Manuscripts Submitted Via the Academy Fellowship Track
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

mSphereDirect: Author-Initiated Peer Review of Manuscripts
por: Imperiale, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Emerging nursing scholars guide to peer reviewing an academic manuscript
por: Oerther, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: Revising a Peer-reviewed Manuscript
por: Bahadoran, Zahra, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Peer Review: How to Review a Plastic Surgery Manuscript
por: Swanson, Eric
Publicado: (2023)

Is the NIH policy for sharing GWAS data running the risk of being counterproductive?
por: Krawczak, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores
por: Erosheva, Elena A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Open Access Policy for CERN Publications
por: CERN Scientific Information Policy Board
Publicado: (2021)

JBJS OA Awards: Recognizing Excellence Among Open Access Manuscripts
por: Lee, Eng Hin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Launching the Israel Journal of Health Policy Research: Why a new journal? Why now? Why open access?
por: Rosen, Bruce, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Virtual slides in peer reviewed, open access medical publication
por: Kayser, Klaus, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The Usefulness of Peer Review for Selecting Manuscripts for Publication: A Utility Analysis Taking as an Example a High-Impact Journal
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

NIEHS Employees Honored by NIH Director and Public Health Service
Publicado: (1995)

Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research awards
por: Ginther, Donna K., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Fast, robust, and accurate monocular peer-to-peer tracking for surgical navigation
por: Strzeletz, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_0sv6ster6rgevps4mgrk3u2u8j