Cargando…

Impact of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria (ASBU) Overtreatment During a Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS)

BACKGROUND: What are the clinical profiles, outcomes, and antimicrobial costs attributed to patients admitted with presumed urinary tract infection (UTI) but deemed to have “no infection” (NI) by infectious diseases (ID) MD reviewers? METHODS: We performed a review of a subset of patients entered in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Semel, Jeffery, Shah, Nirav, Ridgway, Jessica, Singh, Kamaljit, Smith, Becky, Suseno, Mira, Peterson, Lance
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7107076/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1325
_version_ 1783512738859843584
author Semel, Jeffery
Shah, Nirav
Ridgway, Jessica
Singh, Kamaljit
Smith, Becky
Suseno, Mira
Peterson, Lance
author_facet Semel, Jeffery
Shah, Nirav
Ridgway, Jessica
Singh, Kamaljit
Smith, Becky
Suseno, Mira
Peterson, Lance
author_sort Semel, Jeffery
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: What are the clinical profiles, outcomes, and antimicrobial costs attributed to patients admitted with presumed urinary tract infection (UTI) but deemed to have “no infection” (NI) by infectious diseases (ID) MD reviewers? METHODS: We performed a review of a subset of patients entered into a randomized, controlled, AS trial that began 7.1.2015. Patients with UTI and 3 other ID syndromes were evaluated by ID MDs within 12–24 hours of receiving empirical antimicrobials. The ID MD designated patients as having NI when a patient lacked compatible symptoms, signs, and laboratory evidence to support a diagnosis of UTI. Patients with NI were tracked but not included in the study intervention to identify AS opportunities. RESULTS: Over 21 months 6,402 antimicrobial starts were entered into the AS study; 2,196 (34.3%) were UTI. Of these 564 (25.7%) were designated NI. The initial admission of 104 patients designated NI are the subject of this report. Four had possibly clinically significant UTI and were excluded. Of the remaining 100 the average age was 83.6 years, 80% were female and 50% were admitted with acute or chronic altered mental status (dementia, seizure, or stroke); Sixty-five % of urine cultures were positive. The mean Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) score was 0.6; the mean quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (qSOFA) score was 0.9. A mean 3.7 days of antimicrobials were prescribed during the admission; 3.2 additional days at discharge. Of the 100 NI patients followed (up to 21 months following study entry) 34% have died (all-cause), 49% had a subsequent episode of bacteriuria; the mean number of re-admissions per patient was 2.4(range 0–14) and 9% developed C. difficile infection (CDI). CONCLUSION: AS identified a subset of patients treated for UTI but determined by ID MDs as NI, as an elderly, predominantly female cohort, with a high incidence of new or pre-existing neurological conditions, subsequent bacteriuria, re-admission, and short -term mortality. Low SIRS and qSOFA scores in these patients supported a lack of clinically significant infection. AS programs should focus on early efforts to identify ASBU. Preservation of antimicrobial resources, antibiotic cost savings (estimated over 3 years to be $ 450,000), and avoidance of CDI are among the likely benefits. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7107076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71070762020-04-02 Impact of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria (ASBU) Overtreatment During a Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS) Semel, Jeffery Shah, Nirav Ridgway, Jessica Singh, Kamaljit Smith, Becky Suseno, Mira Peterson, Lance Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: What are the clinical profiles, outcomes, and antimicrobial costs attributed to patients admitted with presumed urinary tract infection (UTI) but deemed to have “no infection” (NI) by infectious diseases (ID) MD reviewers? METHODS: We performed a review of a subset of patients entered into a randomized, controlled, AS trial that began 7.1.2015. Patients with UTI and 3 other ID syndromes were evaluated by ID MDs within 12–24 hours of receiving empirical antimicrobials. The ID MD designated patients as having NI when a patient lacked compatible symptoms, signs, and laboratory evidence to support a diagnosis of UTI. Patients with NI were tracked but not included in the study intervention to identify AS opportunities. RESULTS: Over 21 months 6,402 antimicrobial starts were entered into the AS study; 2,196 (34.3%) were UTI. Of these 564 (25.7%) were designated NI. The initial admission of 104 patients designated NI are the subject of this report. Four had possibly clinically significant UTI and were excluded. Of the remaining 100 the average age was 83.6 years, 80% were female and 50% were admitted with acute or chronic altered mental status (dementia, seizure, or stroke); Sixty-five % of urine cultures were positive. The mean Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) score was 0.6; the mean quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (qSOFA) score was 0.9. A mean 3.7 days of antimicrobials were prescribed during the admission; 3.2 additional days at discharge. Of the 100 NI patients followed (up to 21 months following study entry) 34% have died (all-cause), 49% had a subsequent episode of bacteriuria; the mean number of re-admissions per patient was 2.4(range 0–14) and 9% developed C. difficile infection (CDI). CONCLUSION: AS identified a subset of patients treated for UTI but determined by ID MDs as NI, as an elderly, predominantly female cohort, with a high incidence of new or pre-existing neurological conditions, subsequent bacteriuria, re-admission, and short -term mortality. Low SIRS and qSOFA scores in these patients supported a lack of clinically significant infection. AS programs should focus on early efforts to identify ASBU. Preservation of antimicrobial resources, antibiotic cost savings (estimated over 3 years to be $ 450,000), and avoidance of CDI are among the likely benefits. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7107076/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1325 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Semel, Jeffery
Shah, Nirav
Ridgway, Jessica
Singh, Kamaljit
Smith, Becky
Suseno, Mira
Peterson, Lance
Impact of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria (ASBU) Overtreatment During a Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS)
title Impact of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria (ASBU) Overtreatment During a Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS)
title_full Impact of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria (ASBU) Overtreatment During a Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS)
title_fullStr Impact of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria (ASBU) Overtreatment During a Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS)
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria (ASBU) Overtreatment During a Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS)
title_short Impact of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria (ASBU) Overtreatment During a Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS)
title_sort impact of asymptomatic bacteriuria (asbu) overtreatment during a controlled trial of antimicrobial stewardship (as)
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7107076/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1325
work_keys_str_mv AT semeljeffery impactofasymptomaticbacteriuriaasbuovertreatmentduringacontrolledtrialofantimicrobialstewardshipas
AT shahnirav impactofasymptomaticbacteriuriaasbuovertreatmentduringacontrolledtrialofantimicrobialstewardshipas
AT ridgwayjessica impactofasymptomaticbacteriuriaasbuovertreatmentduringacontrolledtrialofantimicrobialstewardshipas
AT singhkamaljit impactofasymptomaticbacteriuriaasbuovertreatmentduringacontrolledtrialofantimicrobialstewardshipas
AT smithbecky impactofasymptomaticbacteriuriaasbuovertreatmentduringacontrolledtrialofantimicrobialstewardshipas
AT susenomira impactofasymptomaticbacteriuriaasbuovertreatmentduringacontrolledtrialofantimicrobialstewardshipas
AT petersonlance impactofasymptomaticbacteriuriaasbuovertreatmentduringacontrolledtrialofantimicrobialstewardshipas