Cargando…
Prospective comparison of R-mix™ shell vial system with direct antigen tests and conventional cell culture for respiratory virus detection
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conventional cell culture (CC) has limited clinical utility as a result of the extended incubation period often required for virus isolation. Alternative methodologies have been introduced in an effort to improve turnaround times. One such system, the R-mix™ shell vial is...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17229589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2006.12.015 |
_version_ | 1783512806614630400 |
---|---|
author | LaSala, P. Rocco Bufton, Kimberly K. Ismail, Nahed Smith, Michael B. |
author_facet | LaSala, P. Rocco Bufton, Kimberly K. Ismail, Nahed Smith, Michael B. |
author_sort | LaSala, P. Rocco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conventional cell culture (CC) has limited clinical utility as a result of the extended incubation period often required for virus isolation. Alternative methodologies have been introduced in an effort to improve turnaround times. One such system, the R-mix™ shell vial is discussed herein. The study objectives were: (a) to establish R-mix™ testing parameters as compared to direct antigen testing (DAT) and CC, and (b) to assess technical aspects and cost of R-mix™ in a high volume clinical virology laboratory. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective analysis of respiratory samples submitted to the clinical virology laboratory between November 2004 and April 2005 was performed. All specimens were inoculated onto R-mix™ shell vials (SV) and CC tubes; and a subset also underwent DAT for influenza A and B and/or RSV. A retrospective estimated cost analysis was made. RESULTS: A total of 563 samples were included in the study, which collectively revealed a total of 207 viruses. Sensitivity of R-mix™ for seven major respiratory viruses ranged from 45% to 83% compared to CC and DAT, while mean time to detection (TTD) varied from 1.1 to 1.4 days. In addition to these viruses, 23 picornaviruses, 11 CMV isolates and 5 HSV isolates were detected by CC alone. CONCLUSIONS: The R-mix™ system has similar sensitivity as CC for the detection of parainfluenza 1–3 and influenza A/B while dramatically reducing the TTD. Furthermore, it is significantly more sensitive and produces more timely results for RSV than CC; yet, neither method offers a diagnostic benefit over rapid DAT for RSV detection. The sensitivity of R-mix™ for adenovirus appears to be significantly lower than that of CC. Lastly, methodologies other than R-mix™ must remain in place under circumstances where identification of other potential viral respiratory pathogens, including herpesviruses and picornaviruses, is desired. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7108409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71084092020-03-31 Prospective comparison of R-mix™ shell vial system with direct antigen tests and conventional cell culture for respiratory virus detection LaSala, P. Rocco Bufton, Kimberly K. Ismail, Nahed Smith, Michael B. J Clin Virol Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conventional cell culture (CC) has limited clinical utility as a result of the extended incubation period often required for virus isolation. Alternative methodologies have been introduced in an effort to improve turnaround times. One such system, the R-mix™ shell vial is discussed herein. The study objectives were: (a) to establish R-mix™ testing parameters as compared to direct antigen testing (DAT) and CC, and (b) to assess technical aspects and cost of R-mix™ in a high volume clinical virology laboratory. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective analysis of respiratory samples submitted to the clinical virology laboratory between November 2004 and April 2005 was performed. All specimens were inoculated onto R-mix™ shell vials (SV) and CC tubes; and a subset also underwent DAT for influenza A and B and/or RSV. A retrospective estimated cost analysis was made. RESULTS: A total of 563 samples were included in the study, which collectively revealed a total of 207 viruses. Sensitivity of R-mix™ for seven major respiratory viruses ranged from 45% to 83% compared to CC and DAT, while mean time to detection (TTD) varied from 1.1 to 1.4 days. In addition to these viruses, 23 picornaviruses, 11 CMV isolates and 5 HSV isolates were detected by CC alone. CONCLUSIONS: The R-mix™ system has similar sensitivity as CC for the detection of parainfluenza 1–3 and influenza A/B while dramatically reducing the TTD. Furthermore, it is significantly more sensitive and produces more timely results for RSV than CC; yet, neither method offers a diagnostic benefit over rapid DAT for RSV detection. The sensitivity of R-mix™ for adenovirus appears to be significantly lower than that of CC. Lastly, methodologies other than R-mix™ must remain in place under circumstances where identification of other potential viral respiratory pathogens, including herpesviruses and picornaviruses, is desired. Elsevier B.V. 2007-03 2007-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7108409/ /pubmed/17229589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2006.12.015 Text en Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article LaSala, P. Rocco Bufton, Kimberly K. Ismail, Nahed Smith, Michael B. Prospective comparison of R-mix™ shell vial system with direct antigen tests and conventional cell culture for respiratory virus detection |
title | Prospective comparison of R-mix™ shell vial system with direct antigen tests and conventional cell culture for respiratory virus detection |
title_full | Prospective comparison of R-mix™ shell vial system with direct antigen tests and conventional cell culture for respiratory virus detection |
title_fullStr | Prospective comparison of R-mix™ shell vial system with direct antigen tests and conventional cell culture for respiratory virus detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective comparison of R-mix™ shell vial system with direct antigen tests and conventional cell culture for respiratory virus detection |
title_short | Prospective comparison of R-mix™ shell vial system with direct antigen tests and conventional cell culture for respiratory virus detection |
title_sort | prospective comparison of r-mix™ shell vial system with direct antigen tests and conventional cell culture for respiratory virus detection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17229589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2006.12.015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lasalaprocco prospectivecomparisonofrmixshellvialsystemwithdirectantigentestsandconventionalcellcultureforrespiratoryvirusdetection AT buftonkimberlyk prospectivecomparisonofrmixshellvialsystemwithdirectantigentestsandconventionalcellcultureforrespiratoryvirusdetection AT ismailnahed prospectivecomparisonofrmixshellvialsystemwithdirectantigentestsandconventionalcellcultureforrespiratoryvirusdetection AT smithmichaelb prospectivecomparisonofrmixshellvialsystemwithdirectantigentestsandconventionalcellcultureforrespiratoryvirusdetection |