Cargando…
Health screenings administered during the domestic medical examination of refugees and other eligible immigrants in nine US states, 2014–2016: A cross-sectional analysis
BACKGROUND: Refugees and other select visa holders are recommended to receive a domestic medical examination within 90 days after arrival to the United States. Limited data have been published on the coverage of screenings offered during this examination across multiple resettlement states, preventi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32231391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003065 |
_version_ | 1783512825718636544 |
---|---|
author | Pezzi, Clelia Lee, Deborah Kumar, Gayathri S. Kawasaki, Breanna Kennedy, Lori Aguirre, Jenny Titus, Melissa Ford, Rebecca Mamo, Blain Urban, Kailey Hughes, Stephen Payton, Colleen Scott, Kevin Montour, Jessica Jentes, Emily S. |
author_facet | Pezzi, Clelia Lee, Deborah Kumar, Gayathri S. Kawasaki, Breanna Kennedy, Lori Aguirre, Jenny Titus, Melissa Ford, Rebecca Mamo, Blain Urban, Kailey Hughes, Stephen Payton, Colleen Scott, Kevin Montour, Jessica Jentes, Emily S. |
author_sort | Pezzi, Clelia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Refugees and other select visa holders are recommended to receive a domestic medical examination within 90 days after arrival to the United States. Limited data have been published on the coverage of screenings offered during this examination across multiple resettlement states, preventing evaluation of this voluntary program’s potential impact on postarrival refugee health. This analysis sought to calculate and compare screening proportions among refugees and other eligible populations to assess the domestic medical examination’s impact on screening coverage resulting from this examination. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to summarize and compare domestic medical examination data from January 2014 to December 2016 from persons receiving a domestic medical examination in seven states (California, Colorado, Minnesota, New York, Kentucky, Illinois, and Texas); one county (Marion County, Indiana); and one academic medical center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. We analyzed screening coverage by sex, age, nationality, and country of last residence of persons and compared the proportions of persons receiving recommended screenings by those characteristics. We received data on disease screenings for 105,541 individuals who received a domestic medical examination; 47% were female and 51.5% were between the ages of 18 and 44. The proportions of people undergoing screening tests for infectious diseases were high, including for tuberculosis (91.6% screened), hepatitis B (95.8% screened), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; 80.3% screened). Screening rates for other health conditions were lower, including mental health (36.8% screened). The main limitation of our analysis was reliance on data that were collected primarily for programmatic rather than surveillance purposes. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, we observed high rates of screening coverage for tuberculosis, hepatitis B, and HIV during the domestic medical examination and lower screening coverage for mental health. This analysis provided evidence that the domestic medical examination is an opportunity to ensure newly arrived refugees and other eligible populations receive recommended health screenings and are connected to the US healthcare system. We also identified knowledge gaps on how screenings are conducted for some conditions, notably mental health, identifying directions for future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7108694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71086942020-04-03 Health screenings administered during the domestic medical examination of refugees and other eligible immigrants in nine US states, 2014–2016: A cross-sectional analysis Pezzi, Clelia Lee, Deborah Kumar, Gayathri S. Kawasaki, Breanna Kennedy, Lori Aguirre, Jenny Titus, Melissa Ford, Rebecca Mamo, Blain Urban, Kailey Hughes, Stephen Payton, Colleen Scott, Kevin Montour, Jessica Jentes, Emily S. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Refugees and other select visa holders are recommended to receive a domestic medical examination within 90 days after arrival to the United States. Limited data have been published on the coverage of screenings offered during this examination across multiple resettlement states, preventing evaluation of this voluntary program’s potential impact on postarrival refugee health. This analysis sought to calculate and compare screening proportions among refugees and other eligible populations to assess the domestic medical examination’s impact on screening coverage resulting from this examination. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to summarize and compare domestic medical examination data from January 2014 to December 2016 from persons receiving a domestic medical examination in seven states (California, Colorado, Minnesota, New York, Kentucky, Illinois, and Texas); one county (Marion County, Indiana); and one academic medical center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. We analyzed screening coverage by sex, age, nationality, and country of last residence of persons and compared the proportions of persons receiving recommended screenings by those characteristics. We received data on disease screenings for 105,541 individuals who received a domestic medical examination; 47% were female and 51.5% were between the ages of 18 and 44. The proportions of people undergoing screening tests for infectious diseases were high, including for tuberculosis (91.6% screened), hepatitis B (95.8% screened), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; 80.3% screened). Screening rates for other health conditions were lower, including mental health (36.8% screened). The main limitation of our analysis was reliance on data that were collected primarily for programmatic rather than surveillance purposes. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, we observed high rates of screening coverage for tuberculosis, hepatitis B, and HIV during the domestic medical examination and lower screening coverage for mental health. This analysis provided evidence that the domestic medical examination is an opportunity to ensure newly arrived refugees and other eligible populations receive recommended health screenings and are connected to the US healthcare system. We also identified knowledge gaps on how screenings are conducted for some conditions, notably mental health, identifying directions for future research. Public Library of Science 2020-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7108694/ /pubmed/32231391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003065 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pezzi, Clelia Lee, Deborah Kumar, Gayathri S. Kawasaki, Breanna Kennedy, Lori Aguirre, Jenny Titus, Melissa Ford, Rebecca Mamo, Blain Urban, Kailey Hughes, Stephen Payton, Colleen Scott, Kevin Montour, Jessica Jentes, Emily S. Health screenings administered during the domestic medical examination of refugees and other eligible immigrants in nine US states, 2014–2016: A cross-sectional analysis |
title | Health screenings administered during the domestic medical examination of refugees and other eligible immigrants in nine US states, 2014–2016: A cross-sectional analysis |
title_full | Health screenings administered during the domestic medical examination of refugees and other eligible immigrants in nine US states, 2014–2016: A cross-sectional analysis |
title_fullStr | Health screenings administered during the domestic medical examination of refugees and other eligible immigrants in nine US states, 2014–2016: A cross-sectional analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Health screenings administered during the domestic medical examination of refugees and other eligible immigrants in nine US states, 2014–2016: A cross-sectional analysis |
title_short | Health screenings administered during the domestic medical examination of refugees and other eligible immigrants in nine US states, 2014–2016: A cross-sectional analysis |
title_sort | health screenings administered during the domestic medical examination of refugees and other eligible immigrants in nine us states, 2014–2016: a cross-sectional analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32231391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pezziclelia healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT leedeborah healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT kumargayathris healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT kawasakibreanna healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT kennedylori healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT aguirrejenny healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT titusmelissa healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT fordrebecca healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT mamoblain healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT urbankailey healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT hughesstephen healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT paytoncolleen healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT scottkevin healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT montourjessica healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis AT jentesemilys healthscreeningsadministeredduringthedomesticmedicalexaminationofrefugeesandothereligibleimmigrantsinnineusstates20142016acrosssectionalanalysis |