Cargando…
A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care
BACKGROUND: Some opportunities to routinely capture and improve respectful maternity care (RMC) during facility-based childbirth include quality improvement (QI) initiatives, community-based monitoring efforts through community score cards (CSC), and performance-based financing (PBF) initiatives. Bu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Global Health: Science and Practice
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32234844 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00323 |
_version_ | 1783512857849102336 |
---|---|
author | Afulani, Patience A. Buback, Laura McNally, Brienne Mbuyita, Selemani Mwanyika-Sando, Mary Peca, Emily |
author_facet | Afulani, Patience A. Buback, Laura McNally, Brienne Mbuyita, Selemani Mwanyika-Sando, Mary Peca, Emily |
author_sort | Afulani, Patience A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Some opportunities to routinely capture and improve respectful maternity care (RMC) during facility-based childbirth include quality improvement (QI) initiatives, community-based monitoring efforts through community score cards (CSC), and performance-based financing (PBF) initiatives. But there is limited guidance on which types of RMC indicators are best suited for inclusion in these initiatives. We sought to provide practical evidence-based recommendations on indicators that may be used for routine measurement of RMC in programs. METHODS: We used a rapid review approach, which included (1) reviewing existing documents and publications to extract RMC indicators and identify which have or can be used in facility-based QI, CSCs, and PBF schemes; (2) surveying RMC and maternal health experts to rank indicators, and (3) analyzing survey data to select the most recommended indicators. RESULTS: We identified 49 indicators spanning several domains of RMC and mistreatment including dignified/nondignified care, verbal and physical abuse, privacy/confidentiality, autonomy/loss of autonomy, supportive care/lack thereof, communication, stigma, discrimination, trust, facility environment/culture, responsiveness, and nonevidence-based care. Based on the analysis of the survey data, we recommend 33 indicators (between 2 and 6 indicators for each RMC domain) that may be suited for incorporation in both facility-based QI and CSC-related monitoring efforts. CONCLUSION: Integrating RMC indicators into QI and CSC initiatives, as well as in other maternal and neonatal health programs, could help improve RMC at the facility and community level. More research is needed into whether RMC can be integrated into PBF initiatives. Integration of RMC indicators into programs to improve quality of care and other health system outcomes will facilitate routine monitoring and accountability around experience of care. Measurement and improvement of women's experiences will increase maternal health service utilization and improve quality of care as a means of reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7108935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Global Health: Science and Practice |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71089352020-04-03 A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care Afulani, Patience A. Buback, Laura McNally, Brienne Mbuyita, Selemani Mwanyika-Sando, Mary Peca, Emily Glob Health Sci Pract Reviews BACKGROUND: Some opportunities to routinely capture and improve respectful maternity care (RMC) during facility-based childbirth include quality improvement (QI) initiatives, community-based monitoring efforts through community score cards (CSC), and performance-based financing (PBF) initiatives. But there is limited guidance on which types of RMC indicators are best suited for inclusion in these initiatives. We sought to provide practical evidence-based recommendations on indicators that may be used for routine measurement of RMC in programs. METHODS: We used a rapid review approach, which included (1) reviewing existing documents and publications to extract RMC indicators and identify which have or can be used in facility-based QI, CSCs, and PBF schemes; (2) surveying RMC and maternal health experts to rank indicators, and (3) analyzing survey data to select the most recommended indicators. RESULTS: We identified 49 indicators spanning several domains of RMC and mistreatment including dignified/nondignified care, verbal and physical abuse, privacy/confidentiality, autonomy/loss of autonomy, supportive care/lack thereof, communication, stigma, discrimination, trust, facility environment/culture, responsiveness, and nonevidence-based care. Based on the analysis of the survey data, we recommend 33 indicators (between 2 and 6 indicators for each RMC domain) that may be suited for incorporation in both facility-based QI and CSC-related monitoring efforts. CONCLUSION: Integrating RMC indicators into QI and CSC initiatives, as well as in other maternal and neonatal health programs, could help improve RMC at the facility and community level. More research is needed into whether RMC can be integrated into PBF initiatives. Integration of RMC indicators into programs to improve quality of care and other health system outcomes will facilitate routine monitoring and accountability around experience of care. Measurement and improvement of women's experiences will increase maternal health service utilization and improve quality of care as a means of reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Global Health: Science and Practice 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7108935/ /pubmed/32234844 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00323 Text en © Afulani et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00323 |
spellingShingle | Reviews Afulani, Patience A. Buback, Laura McNally, Brienne Mbuyita, Selemani Mwanyika-Sando, Mary Peca, Emily A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care |
title | A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care |
title_full | A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care |
title_fullStr | A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care |
title_full_unstemmed | A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care |
title_short | A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care |
title_sort | rapid review of available evidence to inform indicators for routine monitoring and evaluation of respectful maternity care |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32234844 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT afulanipatiencea arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare AT bubacklaura arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare AT mcnallybrienne arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare AT mbuyitaselemani arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare AT mwanyikasandomary arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare AT pecaemily arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare AT afulanipatiencea rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare AT bubacklaura rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare AT mcnallybrienne rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare AT mbuyitaselemani rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare AT mwanyikasandomary rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare AT pecaemily rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare |