Cargando…

A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care

BACKGROUND: Some opportunities to routinely capture and improve respectful maternity care (RMC) during facility-based childbirth include quality improvement (QI) initiatives, community-based monitoring efforts through community score cards (CSC), and performance-based financing (PBF) initiatives. Bu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afulani, Patience A., Buback, Laura, McNally, Brienne, Mbuyita, Selemani, Mwanyika-Sando, Mary, Peca, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32234844
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00323
_version_ 1783512857849102336
author Afulani, Patience A.
Buback, Laura
McNally, Brienne
Mbuyita, Selemani
Mwanyika-Sando, Mary
Peca, Emily
author_facet Afulani, Patience A.
Buback, Laura
McNally, Brienne
Mbuyita, Selemani
Mwanyika-Sando, Mary
Peca, Emily
author_sort Afulani, Patience A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some opportunities to routinely capture and improve respectful maternity care (RMC) during facility-based childbirth include quality improvement (QI) initiatives, community-based monitoring efforts through community score cards (CSC), and performance-based financing (PBF) initiatives. But there is limited guidance on which types of RMC indicators are best suited for inclusion in these initiatives. We sought to provide practical evidence-based recommendations on indicators that may be used for routine measurement of RMC in programs. METHODS: We used a rapid review approach, which included (1) reviewing existing documents and publications to extract RMC indicators and identify which have or can be used in facility-based QI, CSCs, and PBF schemes; (2) surveying RMC and maternal health experts to rank indicators, and (3) analyzing survey data to select the most recommended indicators. RESULTS: We identified 49 indicators spanning several domains of RMC and mistreatment including dignified/nondignified care, verbal and physical abuse, privacy/confidentiality, autonomy/loss of autonomy, supportive care/lack thereof, communication, stigma, discrimination, trust, facility environment/culture, responsiveness, and nonevidence-based care. Based on the analysis of the survey data, we recommend 33 indicators (between 2 and 6 indicators for each RMC domain) that may be suited for incorporation in both facility-based QI and CSC-related monitoring efforts. CONCLUSION: Integrating RMC indicators into QI and CSC initiatives, as well as in other maternal and neonatal health programs, could help improve RMC at the facility and community level. More research is needed into whether RMC can be integrated into PBF initiatives. Integration of RMC indicators into programs to improve quality of care and other health system outcomes will facilitate routine monitoring and accountability around experience of care. Measurement and improvement of women's experiences will increase maternal health service utilization and improve quality of care as a means of reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7108935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71089352020-04-03 A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care Afulani, Patience A. Buback, Laura McNally, Brienne Mbuyita, Selemani Mwanyika-Sando, Mary Peca, Emily Glob Health Sci Pract Reviews BACKGROUND: Some opportunities to routinely capture and improve respectful maternity care (RMC) during facility-based childbirth include quality improvement (QI) initiatives, community-based monitoring efforts through community score cards (CSC), and performance-based financing (PBF) initiatives. But there is limited guidance on which types of RMC indicators are best suited for inclusion in these initiatives. We sought to provide practical evidence-based recommendations on indicators that may be used for routine measurement of RMC in programs. METHODS: We used a rapid review approach, which included (1) reviewing existing documents and publications to extract RMC indicators and identify which have or can be used in facility-based QI, CSCs, and PBF schemes; (2) surveying RMC and maternal health experts to rank indicators, and (3) analyzing survey data to select the most recommended indicators. RESULTS: We identified 49 indicators spanning several domains of RMC and mistreatment including dignified/nondignified care, verbal and physical abuse, privacy/confidentiality, autonomy/loss of autonomy, supportive care/lack thereof, communication, stigma, discrimination, trust, facility environment/culture, responsiveness, and nonevidence-based care. Based on the analysis of the survey data, we recommend 33 indicators (between 2 and 6 indicators for each RMC domain) that may be suited for incorporation in both facility-based QI and CSC-related monitoring efforts. CONCLUSION: Integrating RMC indicators into QI and CSC initiatives, as well as in other maternal and neonatal health programs, could help improve RMC at the facility and community level. More research is needed into whether RMC can be integrated into PBF initiatives. Integration of RMC indicators into programs to improve quality of care and other health system outcomes will facilitate routine monitoring and accountability around experience of care. Measurement and improvement of women's experiences will increase maternal health service utilization and improve quality of care as a means of reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Global Health: Science and Practice 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7108935/ /pubmed/32234844 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00323 Text en © Afulani et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00323
spellingShingle Reviews
Afulani, Patience A.
Buback, Laura
McNally, Brienne
Mbuyita, Selemani
Mwanyika-Sando, Mary
Peca, Emily
A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care
title A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care
title_full A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care
title_fullStr A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care
title_full_unstemmed A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care
title_short A Rapid Review of Available Evidence to Inform Indicators for Routine Monitoring and Evaluation of Respectful Maternity Care
title_sort rapid review of available evidence to inform indicators for routine monitoring and evaluation of respectful maternity care
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32234844
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00323
work_keys_str_mv AT afulanipatiencea arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare
AT bubacklaura arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare
AT mcnallybrienne arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare
AT mbuyitaselemani arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare
AT mwanyikasandomary arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare
AT pecaemily arapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare
AT afulanipatiencea rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare
AT bubacklaura rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare
AT mcnallybrienne rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare
AT mbuyitaselemani rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare
AT mwanyikasandomary rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare
AT pecaemily rapidreviewofavailableevidencetoinformindicatorsforroutinemonitoringandevaluationofrespectfulmaternitycare