Cargando…

Non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease: what is the evidence for efficacy?

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been a surge in non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease (PD). With increasing interest in these novel therapies, we conducted a narrative review to explore the efficacy and safety of these treatments to provide clarity for patients and providers. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aditya, Ishan, Kwong, Jethro C. C., Krakowsky, Yonah, Grober, Ethan D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32257870
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.09.36
_version_ 1783512865890631680
author Aditya, Ishan
Kwong, Jethro C. C.
Krakowsky, Yonah
Grober, Ethan D.
author_facet Aditya, Ishan
Kwong, Jethro C. C.
Krakowsky, Yonah
Grober, Ethan D.
author_sort Aditya, Ishan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been a surge in non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease (PD). With increasing interest in these novel therapies, we conducted a narrative review to explore the efficacy and safety of these treatments to provide clarity for patients and providers. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to find studies describing non-conventional treatments of PD. These treatments were defined as those within the standard of care, including intralesional therapies and surgical options. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were found. Non-conventional therapies included platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), combination therapy of PRP and HA, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), stem cell therapy (SCT), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and H-100. Most studies were limited to animal models and reported modest improvements in angulation and erectile function. Complication rates and cost of each treatment were infrequently reported. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence supporting non-conventional therapies for PD. As such, they are currently not recommended in clinical guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7108993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71089932020-04-01 Non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease: what is the evidence for efficacy? Aditya, Ishan Kwong, Jethro C. C. Krakowsky, Yonah Grober, Ethan D. Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been a surge in non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease (PD). With increasing interest in these novel therapies, we conducted a narrative review to explore the efficacy and safety of these treatments to provide clarity for patients and providers. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to find studies describing non-conventional treatments of PD. These treatments were defined as those within the standard of care, including intralesional therapies and surgical options. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were found. Non-conventional therapies included platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), combination therapy of PRP and HA, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), stem cell therapy (SCT), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and H-100. Most studies were limited to animal models and reported modest improvements in angulation and erectile function. Complication rates and cost of each treatment were infrequently reported. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence supporting non-conventional therapies for PD. As such, they are currently not recommended in clinical guidelines. AME Publishing Company 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7108993/ /pubmed/32257870 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.09.36 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Aditya, Ishan
Kwong, Jethro C. C.
Krakowsky, Yonah
Grober, Ethan D.
Non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease: what is the evidence for efficacy?
title Non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease: what is the evidence for efficacy?
title_full Non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease: what is the evidence for efficacy?
title_fullStr Non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease: what is the evidence for efficacy?
title_full_unstemmed Non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease: what is the evidence for efficacy?
title_short Non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease: what is the evidence for efficacy?
title_sort non-conventional therapies for peyronie’s disease: what is the evidence for efficacy?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32257870
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.09.36
work_keys_str_mv AT adityaishan nonconventionaltherapiesforpeyroniesdiseasewhatistheevidenceforefficacy
AT kwongjethrocc nonconventionaltherapiesforpeyroniesdiseasewhatistheevidenceforefficacy
AT krakowskyyonah nonconventionaltherapiesforpeyroniesdiseasewhatistheevidenceforefficacy
AT groberethand nonconventionaltherapiesforpeyroniesdiseasewhatistheevidenceforefficacy