Cargando…
Errors in determination of net survival: cause-specific and relative survival settings
BACKGROUND: Cause-specific and relative survival estimates differ. We aimed to examine these differences in common cancers where by possible identifying the most plausible sources of error in each estimate. METHODS: Ten-year cause-specific and relative survival were estimated for lung, breast, prost...
Autores principales: | Bright, Chloe J., Brentnall, Adam R., Wooldrage, Kate, Myles, Jonathon, Sasieni, Peter, Duffy, Stephen W. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7109046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32037401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0739-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
On standardized relative survival
por: Sasieni, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
A comparison of relative survival and cause‐specific survival methods to measure net survival in cancer populations
por: Makkar, Nupur, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Prostate cancer: net survival and cause-specific survival rates after multiple imputation
por: Morisot, Adeline, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Use of the concordance index for predictors of censored survival data
por: Brentnall, Adam R, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Reporting net survival in populations: a sensitivity analysis in lung cancer demonstrates the differential implications of reporting relative survival and cause-specific survival
por: Tan, Kay See, et al.
Publicado: (2019)