Cargando…

Oral ethinyl estradiol treatment in women with cystic fibrosis is associated with lower bone mineral density

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether estrogen supplementation primarily from oral contraceptive pills compared to no estrogen supplementation is associated with differences in mean bone mineral density (BMD) measured by DXA in a cross-sectional study of women with cystic fib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Malinda, Hunt, William R., Putman, Melissa S., Tangpricha, Vin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7109452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32257821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcte.2020.100223
_version_ 1783512952374034432
author Wu, Malinda
Hunt, William R.
Putman, Melissa S.
Tangpricha, Vin
author_facet Wu, Malinda
Hunt, William R.
Putman, Melissa S.
Tangpricha, Vin
author_sort Wu, Malinda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether estrogen supplementation primarily from oral contraceptive pills compared to no estrogen supplementation is associated with differences in mean bone mineral density (BMD) measured by DXA in a cross-sectional study of women with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of women with CF followed at a single center, we analyzed 49 women with CF ages 18–50 years with a documented DXA. BMD of women with CF taking estrogen supplementation was compared to BMD of women with CF not taking estrogen supplementation. RESULTS: Twelve women with CF were taking estrogen supplementation with mean dose of 23.3 mcg/day (SD 6.9 mcg/day) of ethinyl estradiol. There were no statistically significant differences between demographics of the 12 women with CF taking estrogen supplementation compared to the 37 women with CF not taking estrogen supplementation. Women taking estrogen had lower mean lumbar spine Z-score: −0.7 ± 0.7, compared to women not taking estrogen, Z-score: −0.04 ± 1.0 (p-value 0.046). Women taking estrogen had lower mean BMD at the lumbar spine: 0.952 ± 0.086 g/cm(2), compared to women not taking estrogen: 1.023 ± 0.105 g/cm(2) (p-value 0.038). Similar trends were seen at the total hip and femoral neck. CONCLUSION: Low-dose estrogen supplementation in premenopausal women with CF was associated with lower BMD compared to no estrogen supplementation in a similar group of premenopausal young women with CF. Future studies are needed to investigate the optimal formulation, route of administration, and dose to accrue and preserve bone mass in premenopausal women with CF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7109452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71094522020-04-03 Oral ethinyl estradiol treatment in women with cystic fibrosis is associated with lower bone mineral density Wu, Malinda Hunt, William R. Putman, Melissa S. Tangpricha, Vin J Clin Transl Endocrinol Research Paper OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether estrogen supplementation primarily from oral contraceptive pills compared to no estrogen supplementation is associated with differences in mean bone mineral density (BMD) measured by DXA in a cross-sectional study of women with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of women with CF followed at a single center, we analyzed 49 women with CF ages 18–50 years with a documented DXA. BMD of women with CF taking estrogen supplementation was compared to BMD of women with CF not taking estrogen supplementation. RESULTS: Twelve women with CF were taking estrogen supplementation with mean dose of 23.3 mcg/day (SD 6.9 mcg/day) of ethinyl estradiol. There were no statistically significant differences between demographics of the 12 women with CF taking estrogen supplementation compared to the 37 women with CF not taking estrogen supplementation. Women taking estrogen had lower mean lumbar spine Z-score: −0.7 ± 0.7, compared to women not taking estrogen, Z-score: −0.04 ± 1.0 (p-value 0.046). Women taking estrogen had lower mean BMD at the lumbar spine: 0.952 ± 0.086 g/cm(2), compared to women not taking estrogen: 1.023 ± 0.105 g/cm(2) (p-value 0.038). Similar trends were seen at the total hip and femoral neck. CONCLUSION: Low-dose estrogen supplementation in premenopausal women with CF was associated with lower BMD compared to no estrogen supplementation in a similar group of premenopausal young women with CF. Future studies are needed to investigate the optimal formulation, route of administration, and dose to accrue and preserve bone mass in premenopausal women with CF. Elsevier 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7109452/ /pubmed/32257821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcte.2020.100223 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Wu, Malinda
Hunt, William R.
Putman, Melissa S.
Tangpricha, Vin
Oral ethinyl estradiol treatment in women with cystic fibrosis is associated with lower bone mineral density
title Oral ethinyl estradiol treatment in women with cystic fibrosis is associated with lower bone mineral density
title_full Oral ethinyl estradiol treatment in women with cystic fibrosis is associated with lower bone mineral density
title_fullStr Oral ethinyl estradiol treatment in women with cystic fibrosis is associated with lower bone mineral density
title_full_unstemmed Oral ethinyl estradiol treatment in women with cystic fibrosis is associated with lower bone mineral density
title_short Oral ethinyl estradiol treatment in women with cystic fibrosis is associated with lower bone mineral density
title_sort oral ethinyl estradiol treatment in women with cystic fibrosis is associated with lower bone mineral density
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7109452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32257821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcte.2020.100223
work_keys_str_mv AT wumalinda oralethinylestradioltreatmentinwomenwithcysticfibrosisisassociatedwithlowerbonemineraldensity
AT huntwilliamr oralethinylestradioltreatmentinwomenwithcysticfibrosisisassociatedwithlowerbonemineraldensity
AT putmanmelissas oralethinylestradioltreatmentinwomenwithcysticfibrosisisassociatedwithlowerbonemineraldensity
AT tangprichavin oralethinylestradioltreatmentinwomenwithcysticfibrosisisassociatedwithlowerbonemineraldensity