Cargando…

Extension implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-year results of a retrospective case-series

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Blade implants account for one of the most debated dental implants design in scientific literature. They have been reconsidered by clinicians since their re-classification by Food and Drug Administration in 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study aimed to evaluate the outc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menchini-Fabris, Giovanni Battista, Marconcini, Simone, Giammarinaro, Enrica, Barone, Antonio, Toti, Paolo, Covani, Ugo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7109493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2018.11.009
_version_ 1783512961952776192
author Menchini-Fabris, Giovanni Battista
Marconcini, Simone
Giammarinaro, Enrica
Barone, Antonio
Toti, Paolo
Covani, Ugo
author_facet Menchini-Fabris, Giovanni Battista
Marconcini, Simone
Giammarinaro, Enrica
Barone, Antonio
Toti, Paolo
Covani, Ugo
author_sort Menchini-Fabris, Giovanni Battista
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Blade implants account for one of the most debated dental implants design in scientific literature. They have been reconsidered by clinicians since their re-classification by Food and Drug Administration in 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study aimed to evaluate the outcome of newly manufactured extension implants in the treatment of moderate atrophic posterior maxillae. All the patients enrolled in the present retrospective case series study showed a moderate bone atrophy in the posterior maxilla with a maximum residual height ranging between 4 mm and 8 mm. Implants were inserted with the aid of an electro-magnetic device, and then they covered with screws and left healing. Three months after, implants were exposed and loaded. RESULTS: Difference between the marginal bone level at the 3-month evaluation (5.57 ± 0.67 mm) and that at baseline (5.67 ± 0.55 mm) appeared to be not significant (p-value = 0.63). At the 12-month evaluation, the marginal bone level (4.95 ± 0.45 mm) underwent significant decrease respect to baseline value as proven by significant change at marginal bone level (−0.62 ± 0.51 mm with a p-value = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggested a positive 12-month outcome for extension implants in the rehabilitation of the moderate atrophic maxilla, without the need of extensive reconstructive surgeries and grafting procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7109493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71094932020-04-03 Extension implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-year results of a retrospective case-series Menchini-Fabris, Giovanni Battista Marconcini, Simone Giammarinaro, Enrica Barone, Antonio Toti, Paolo Covani, Ugo J Dent Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Blade implants account for one of the most debated dental implants design in scientific literature. They have been reconsidered by clinicians since their re-classification by Food and Drug Administration in 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study aimed to evaluate the outcome of newly manufactured extension implants in the treatment of moderate atrophic posterior maxillae. All the patients enrolled in the present retrospective case series study showed a moderate bone atrophy in the posterior maxilla with a maximum residual height ranging between 4 mm and 8 mm. Implants were inserted with the aid of an electro-magnetic device, and then they covered with screws and left healing. Three months after, implants were exposed and loaded. RESULTS: Difference between the marginal bone level at the 3-month evaluation (5.57 ± 0.67 mm) and that at baseline (5.67 ± 0.55 mm) appeared to be not significant (p-value = 0.63). At the 12-month evaluation, the marginal bone level (4.95 ± 0.45 mm) underwent significant decrease respect to baseline value as proven by significant change at marginal bone level (−0.62 ± 0.51 mm with a p-value = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggested a positive 12-month outcome for extension implants in the rehabilitation of the moderate atrophic maxilla, without the need of extensive reconstructive surgeries and grafting procedures. Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2020-03 2020-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7109493/ /pubmed/32256994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2018.11.009 Text en © 2020 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Menchini-Fabris, Giovanni Battista
Marconcini, Simone
Giammarinaro, Enrica
Barone, Antonio
Toti, Paolo
Covani, Ugo
Extension implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-year results of a retrospective case-series
title Extension implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-year results of a retrospective case-series
title_full Extension implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-year results of a retrospective case-series
title_fullStr Extension implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-year results of a retrospective case-series
title_full_unstemmed Extension implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-year results of a retrospective case-series
title_short Extension implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-year results of a retrospective case-series
title_sort extension implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: 1-year results of a retrospective case-series
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7109493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2018.11.009
work_keys_str_mv AT menchinifabrisgiovannibattista extensionimplantsintheatrophicposteriormaxilla1yearresultsofaretrospectivecaseseries
AT marconcinisimone extensionimplantsintheatrophicposteriormaxilla1yearresultsofaretrospectivecaseseries
AT giammarinaroenrica extensionimplantsintheatrophicposteriormaxilla1yearresultsofaretrospectivecaseseries
AT baroneantonio extensionimplantsintheatrophicposteriormaxilla1yearresultsofaretrospectivecaseseries
AT totipaolo extensionimplantsintheatrophicposteriormaxilla1yearresultsofaretrospectivecaseseries
AT covaniugo extensionimplantsintheatrophicposteriormaxilla1yearresultsofaretrospectivecaseseries