Cargando…

A Neuroanatomically Grounded Optimal Control Model of the Compensatory Eye Movement System in Mice

We present a working model of the compensatory eye movement system in mice. We challenge the model with a data set of eye movements in mice (n =34) recorded in 4 different sinusoidal stimulus conditions with 36 different combinations of frequency (0.1–3.2 Hz) and amplitude (0.5–8°) in each condition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holland, Peter J., Sibindi, Tafadzwa M., Ginzburg, Marik, Das, Suman, Arkesteijn, Kiki, Frens, Maarten A., Donchin, Opher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7109542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2020.00013
_version_ 1783512973864599552
author Holland, Peter J.
Sibindi, Tafadzwa M.
Ginzburg, Marik
Das, Suman
Arkesteijn, Kiki
Frens, Maarten A.
Donchin, Opher
author_facet Holland, Peter J.
Sibindi, Tafadzwa M.
Ginzburg, Marik
Das, Suman
Arkesteijn, Kiki
Frens, Maarten A.
Donchin, Opher
author_sort Holland, Peter J.
collection PubMed
description We present a working model of the compensatory eye movement system in mice. We challenge the model with a data set of eye movements in mice (n =34) recorded in 4 different sinusoidal stimulus conditions with 36 different combinations of frequency (0.1–3.2 Hz) and amplitude (0.5–8°) in each condition. The conditions included vestibular stimulation in the dark (vestibular-ocular reflex, VOR), optokinetic stimulation (optokinetic reflex, OKR), and two combined visual/vestibular conditions (the visual-vestibular ocular reflex, vVOR, and visual suppression of the VOR, sVOR). The model successfully reproduced the eye movements in all conditions, except for minor failures to predict phase when gain was very low. Most importantly, it could explain the interaction of VOR and OKR when the two reflexes are activated simultaneously during vVOR stimulation. In addition to our own data, we also reproduced the behavior of the compensatory eye movement system found in the existing literature. These include its response to sum-of-sines stimuli, its response after lesions of the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi or the flocculus, characteristics of VOR adaptation, and characteristics of drift in the dark. Our model is based on ideas of state prediction and forward modeling that have been widely used in the study of motor control. However, it represents one of the first quantitative efforts to simulate the full range of behaviors of a specific system. The model has two separate processing loops, one for vestibular stimulation and one for visual stimulation. Importantly, state prediction in the visual processing loop depends on a forward model of residual retinal slip after vestibular processing. In addition, we hypothesize that adaptation in the system is primarily adaptation of this model. In other words, VOR adaptation happens primarily in the OKR loop.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7109542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71095422020-04-08 A Neuroanatomically Grounded Optimal Control Model of the Compensatory Eye Movement System in Mice Holland, Peter J. Sibindi, Tafadzwa M. Ginzburg, Marik Das, Suman Arkesteijn, Kiki Frens, Maarten A. Donchin, Opher Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience We present a working model of the compensatory eye movement system in mice. We challenge the model with a data set of eye movements in mice (n =34) recorded in 4 different sinusoidal stimulus conditions with 36 different combinations of frequency (0.1–3.2 Hz) and amplitude (0.5–8°) in each condition. The conditions included vestibular stimulation in the dark (vestibular-ocular reflex, VOR), optokinetic stimulation (optokinetic reflex, OKR), and two combined visual/vestibular conditions (the visual-vestibular ocular reflex, vVOR, and visual suppression of the VOR, sVOR). The model successfully reproduced the eye movements in all conditions, except for minor failures to predict phase when gain was very low. Most importantly, it could explain the interaction of VOR and OKR when the two reflexes are activated simultaneously during vVOR stimulation. In addition to our own data, we also reproduced the behavior of the compensatory eye movement system found in the existing literature. These include its response to sum-of-sines stimuli, its response after lesions of the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi or the flocculus, characteristics of VOR adaptation, and characteristics of drift in the dark. Our model is based on ideas of state prediction and forward modeling that have been widely used in the study of motor control. However, it represents one of the first quantitative efforts to simulate the full range of behaviors of a specific system. The model has two separate processing loops, one for vestibular stimulation and one for visual stimulation. Importantly, state prediction in the visual processing loop depends on a forward model of residual retinal slip after vestibular processing. In addition, we hypothesize that adaptation in the system is primarily adaptation of this model. In other words, VOR adaptation happens primarily in the OKR loop. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7109542/ /pubmed/32269516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2020.00013 Text en Copyright © 2020 Holland, Sibindi, Ginzburg, Das, Arkesteijn, Frens and Donchin. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Holland, Peter J.
Sibindi, Tafadzwa M.
Ginzburg, Marik
Das, Suman
Arkesteijn, Kiki
Frens, Maarten A.
Donchin, Opher
A Neuroanatomically Grounded Optimal Control Model of the Compensatory Eye Movement System in Mice
title A Neuroanatomically Grounded Optimal Control Model of the Compensatory Eye Movement System in Mice
title_full A Neuroanatomically Grounded Optimal Control Model of the Compensatory Eye Movement System in Mice
title_fullStr A Neuroanatomically Grounded Optimal Control Model of the Compensatory Eye Movement System in Mice
title_full_unstemmed A Neuroanatomically Grounded Optimal Control Model of the Compensatory Eye Movement System in Mice
title_short A Neuroanatomically Grounded Optimal Control Model of the Compensatory Eye Movement System in Mice
title_sort neuroanatomically grounded optimal control model of the compensatory eye movement system in mice
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7109542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2020.00013
work_keys_str_mv AT hollandpeterj aneuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT sibinditafadzwam aneuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT ginzburgmarik aneuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT dassuman aneuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT arkesteijnkiki aneuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT frensmaartena aneuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT donchinopher aneuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT hollandpeterj neuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT sibinditafadzwam neuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT ginzburgmarik neuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT dassuman neuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT arkesteijnkiki neuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT frensmaartena neuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice
AT donchinopher neuroanatomicallygroundedoptimalcontrolmodelofthecompensatoryeyemovementsysteminmice