Cargando…
Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations
Motivation: Immunological bioinformatics methods are applicable to a broad range of scientific areas. The specifics of how and where they might be implemented have recently been reviewed in the literature. However, the background and concerns for selecting between the different available methods hav...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7110254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18045832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm471 |
_version_ | 1783513018283327488 |
---|---|
author | Lundegaard, Claus Lund, Ole Keşmir, Can Brunak, Søren Nielsen, Morten |
author_facet | Lundegaard, Claus Lund, Ole Keşmir, Can Brunak, Søren Nielsen, Morten |
author_sort | Lundegaard, Claus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Motivation: Immunological bioinformatics methods are applicable to a broad range of scientific areas. The specifics of how and where they might be implemented have recently been reviewed in the literature. However, the background and concerns for selecting between the different available methods have so far not been adequately covered. Summary: Before using predictions systems, it is necessary to not only understand how the methods are constructed but also their strength and limitations. The prediction systems in humoral epitope discovery are still in their infancy, but have reached a reasonable level of predictive strength. In cellular immunology, MHC class I binding predictions are now very strong and cover most of the known HLA specificities. These systems work well for epitope discovery, and predictions of the MHC class I pathway have been further improved by integration with state-of-the-art prediction tools for proteasomal cleavage and TAP binding. By comparison, class II MHC binding predictions have not developed to a comparable accuracy level, but new tools have emerged that deliver significantly improved predictions not only in terms of accuracy, but also in MHC specificity coverage. Simulation systems and mathematical modeling are also now beginning to reach a level where these methods will be able to answer more complex immunological questions. Contact: lunde@cbs.dtu.dk Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7110254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71102542020-04-02 Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations Lundegaard, Claus Lund, Ole Keşmir, Can Brunak, Søren Nielsen, Morten Bioinformatics Review Motivation: Immunological bioinformatics methods are applicable to a broad range of scientific areas. The specifics of how and where they might be implemented have recently been reviewed in the literature. However, the background and concerns for selecting between the different available methods have so far not been adequately covered. Summary: Before using predictions systems, it is necessary to not only understand how the methods are constructed but also their strength and limitations. The prediction systems in humoral epitope discovery are still in their infancy, but have reached a reasonable level of predictive strength. In cellular immunology, MHC class I binding predictions are now very strong and cover most of the known HLA specificities. These systems work well for epitope discovery, and predictions of the MHC class I pathway have been further improved by integration with state-of-the-art prediction tools for proteasomal cleavage and TAP binding. By comparison, class II MHC binding predictions have not developed to a comparable accuracy level, but new tools have emerged that deliver significantly improved predictions not only in terms of accuracy, but also in MHC specificity coverage. Simulation systems and mathematical modeling are also now beginning to reach a level where these methods will be able to answer more complex immunological questions. Contact: lunde@cbs.dtu.dk Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2007-12-15 2007-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7110254/ /pubmed/18045832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm471 Text en © 2007 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Lundegaard, Claus Lund, Ole Keşmir, Can Brunak, Søren Nielsen, Morten Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations |
title | Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations |
title_full | Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations |
title_fullStr | Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations |
title_short | Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations |
title_sort | modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7110254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18045832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm471 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lundegaardclaus modelingtheadaptiveimmunesystempredictionsandsimulations AT lundole modelingtheadaptiveimmunesystempredictionsandsimulations AT kesmircan modelingtheadaptiveimmunesystempredictionsandsimulations AT brunaksøren modelingtheadaptiveimmunesystempredictionsandsimulations AT nielsenmorten modelingtheadaptiveimmunesystempredictionsandsimulations |