Cargando…

Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations

Motivation: Immunological bioinformatics methods are applicable to a broad range of scientific areas. The specifics of how and where they might be implemented have recently been reviewed in the literature. However, the background and concerns for selecting between the different available methods hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lundegaard, Claus, Lund, Ole, Keşmir, Can, Brunak, Søren, Nielsen, Morten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7110254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18045832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm471
_version_ 1783513018283327488
author Lundegaard, Claus
Lund, Ole
Keşmir, Can
Brunak, Søren
Nielsen, Morten
author_facet Lundegaard, Claus
Lund, Ole
Keşmir, Can
Brunak, Søren
Nielsen, Morten
author_sort Lundegaard, Claus
collection PubMed
description Motivation: Immunological bioinformatics methods are applicable to a broad range of scientific areas. The specifics of how and where they might be implemented have recently been reviewed in the literature. However, the background and concerns for selecting between the different available methods have so far not been adequately covered. Summary: Before using predictions systems, it is necessary to not only understand how the methods are constructed but also their strength and limitations. The prediction systems in humoral epitope discovery are still in their infancy, but have reached a reasonable level of predictive strength. In cellular immunology, MHC class I binding predictions are now very strong and cover most of the known HLA specificities. These systems work well for epitope discovery, and predictions of the MHC class I pathway have been further improved by integration with state-of-the-art prediction tools for proteasomal cleavage and TAP binding. By comparison, class II MHC binding predictions have not developed to a comparable accuracy level, but new tools have emerged that deliver significantly improved predictions not only in terms of accuracy, but also in MHC specificity coverage. Simulation systems and mathematical modeling are also now beginning to reach a level where these methods will be able to answer more complex immunological questions. Contact: lunde@cbs.dtu.dk Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7110254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71102542020-04-02 Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations Lundegaard, Claus Lund, Ole Keşmir, Can Brunak, Søren Nielsen, Morten Bioinformatics Review Motivation: Immunological bioinformatics methods are applicable to a broad range of scientific areas. The specifics of how and where they might be implemented have recently been reviewed in the literature. However, the background and concerns for selecting between the different available methods have so far not been adequately covered. Summary: Before using predictions systems, it is necessary to not only understand how the methods are constructed but also their strength and limitations. The prediction systems in humoral epitope discovery are still in their infancy, but have reached a reasonable level of predictive strength. In cellular immunology, MHC class I binding predictions are now very strong and cover most of the known HLA specificities. These systems work well for epitope discovery, and predictions of the MHC class I pathway have been further improved by integration with state-of-the-art prediction tools for proteasomal cleavage and TAP binding. By comparison, class II MHC binding predictions have not developed to a comparable accuracy level, but new tools have emerged that deliver significantly improved predictions not only in terms of accuracy, but also in MHC specificity coverage. Simulation systems and mathematical modeling are also now beginning to reach a level where these methods will be able to answer more complex immunological questions. Contact: lunde@cbs.dtu.dk Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2007-12-15 2007-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7110254/ /pubmed/18045832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm471 Text en © 2007 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Lundegaard, Claus
Lund, Ole
Keşmir, Can
Brunak, Søren
Nielsen, Morten
Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations
title Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations
title_full Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations
title_fullStr Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations
title_short Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations
title_sort modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7110254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18045832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm471
work_keys_str_mv AT lundegaardclaus modelingtheadaptiveimmunesystempredictionsandsimulations
AT lundole modelingtheadaptiveimmunesystempredictionsandsimulations
AT kesmircan modelingtheadaptiveimmunesystempredictionsandsimulations
AT brunaksøren modelingtheadaptiveimmunesystempredictionsandsimulations
AT nielsenmorten modelingtheadaptiveimmunesystempredictionsandsimulations