Cargando…
Identifying potential emerging threats through epidemic intelligence activities—looking for the needle in the haystack?
BACKGROUND: Epidemic intelligence (EI) for emerging infections is the process of identifying key information on emerging infectious diseases and specific incidents. Automated web-based infectious disease surveillance technologies are available; however, human input is still needed to review, validat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7110621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31629079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2019.10.011 |
_version_ | 1783513087636144128 |
---|---|
author | Wilburn, Jennifer O’Connor, Catherine Walsh, Amanda L. Morgan, Dilys |
author_facet | Wilburn, Jennifer O’Connor, Catherine Walsh, Amanda L. Morgan, Dilys |
author_sort | Wilburn, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Epidemic intelligence (EI) for emerging infections is the process of identifying key information on emerging infectious diseases and specific incidents. Automated web-based infectious disease surveillance technologies are available; however, human input is still needed to review, validate, and interpret these sources. In this study, entries captured by Public Health England’s (PHE) manual event-based EI system were examined to inform future intelligence gathering activities. METHODS: A descriptive analysis of unique events captured in a database between 2013 and 2017 was conducted. The top five diseases in terms of the number of entries were described in depth to determine the effectiveness of PHE’s EI surveillance system compared to other sources. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2017, a total of 22 847 unique entries were added to the database. The top three initial and definitive information sources varied considerably by disease. Ebola entries dominated the database, making up 23.7% of the total, followed by Zika (11.8%), Middle East respiratory syndrome (6.7%), cholera (5.5%), and yellow fever and undiagnosed morbidity (both 3.3%). Initial reports of major outbreaks due to the top five disease agents were picked up through the manual system prior to being publicly reported by official sources. CONCLUSIONS: PHE’s manual EI process quickly and accurately detected global public health threats at the earliest stages and allowed for monitoring of events as they evolved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7110621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71106212020-04-02 Identifying potential emerging threats through epidemic intelligence activities—looking for the needle in the haystack? Wilburn, Jennifer O’Connor, Catherine Walsh, Amanda L. Morgan, Dilys Int J Infect Dis Article BACKGROUND: Epidemic intelligence (EI) for emerging infections is the process of identifying key information on emerging infectious diseases and specific incidents. Automated web-based infectious disease surveillance technologies are available; however, human input is still needed to review, validate, and interpret these sources. In this study, entries captured by Public Health England’s (PHE) manual event-based EI system were examined to inform future intelligence gathering activities. METHODS: A descriptive analysis of unique events captured in a database between 2013 and 2017 was conducted. The top five diseases in terms of the number of entries were described in depth to determine the effectiveness of PHE’s EI surveillance system compared to other sources. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2017, a total of 22 847 unique entries were added to the database. The top three initial and definitive information sources varied considerably by disease. Ebola entries dominated the database, making up 23.7% of the total, followed by Zika (11.8%), Middle East respiratory syndrome (6.7%), cholera (5.5%), and yellow fever and undiagnosed morbidity (both 3.3%). Initial reports of major outbreaks due to the top five disease agents were picked up through the manual system prior to being publicly reported by official sources. CONCLUSIONS: PHE’s manual EI process quickly and accurately detected global public health threats at the earliest stages and allowed for monitoring of events as they evolved. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2019-12 2019-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7110621/ /pubmed/31629079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2019.10.011 Text en Crown Copyright © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Wilburn, Jennifer O’Connor, Catherine Walsh, Amanda L. Morgan, Dilys Identifying potential emerging threats through epidemic intelligence activities—looking for the needle in the haystack? |
title | Identifying potential emerging threats through epidemic intelligence activities—looking for the needle in the haystack? |
title_full | Identifying potential emerging threats through epidemic intelligence activities—looking for the needle in the haystack? |
title_fullStr | Identifying potential emerging threats through epidemic intelligence activities—looking for the needle in the haystack? |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying potential emerging threats through epidemic intelligence activities—looking for the needle in the haystack? |
title_short | Identifying potential emerging threats through epidemic intelligence activities—looking for the needle in the haystack? |
title_sort | identifying potential emerging threats through epidemic intelligence activities—looking for the needle in the haystack? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7110621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31629079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2019.10.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilburnjennifer identifyingpotentialemergingthreatsthroughepidemicintelligenceactivitieslookingfortheneedleinthehaystack AT oconnorcatherine identifyingpotentialemergingthreatsthroughepidemicintelligenceactivitieslookingfortheneedleinthehaystack AT walshamandal identifyingpotentialemergingthreatsthroughepidemicintelligenceactivitieslookingfortheneedleinthehaystack AT morgandilys identifyingpotentialemergingthreatsthroughepidemicintelligenceactivitieslookingfortheneedleinthehaystack |