Cargando…

Dose-response of resistance training for neck-and shoulder pain relief: a workplace intervention study

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders are highly prevalent among office workers, with strong evidence suggesting that workplace-based resistance training programs can prevent several upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of the present study was to examine the dose-response relationship...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saeterbakken, Atle Hole, Makrygiannis, Paula, Stien, Nicolay, Solstad, Tom Erik Jorung, Shaw, Matthew, Andersen, Vidar, Pedersen, Helene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7110779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-0158-0
_version_ 1783513133422215168
author Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
Makrygiannis, Paula
Stien, Nicolay
Solstad, Tom Erik Jorung
Shaw, Matthew
Andersen, Vidar
Pedersen, Helene
author_facet Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
Makrygiannis, Paula
Stien, Nicolay
Solstad, Tom Erik Jorung
Shaw, Matthew
Andersen, Vidar
Pedersen, Helene
author_sort Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders are highly prevalent among office workers, with strong evidence suggesting that workplace-based resistance training programs can prevent several upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of the present study was to examine the dose-response relationship between resistance training frequency and pain relief among office workers with neck- and shoulder pain. METHODS: Thirty participants with mild to moderate neck- and shoulder pain attended a 16-week intervention starting with an eight-week control period followed by an eight-week training period. After the control period, the participants were randomized into either a 10 min (TG10) or 2 × 10 min (TG2) workplace-based, high-intensity neck- and shoulder specific resistance training program that was executed 5 days per week and consisting of four exercises. The participants were tested pre and post each period for mean and worst pain using the 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), 0-100 mm health-related quality of life and isometric strength of the neck-and shoulder region. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Friedman with Bonferroni post hoc corrections were used to assess differences in between and within groups for the three testing times pre, mid and post intervention. RESULTS: No differences were observed between the groups in any of the variables in the control period (p = 0.27–0.97) or training period (p = 0.37–0.68). When merging the two groups, the mean and worst pain was reduced by 25 and 43% (p = 0.05 and < 0.01, ES = 0.41 and 0.55) in the training period in addition to 10.6% increase in health-related quality of life (p = 0.01, ES = 0.52). No difference in strength was observed (p = 0.29–0.85). CONCLUSION: Daily bouts of specific high-intensity resistance training of the shoulder and neck region at the workplace reduced neck- and shoulder pain and improved quality of life of office workers. However, 10 min bouts were equally effective as 2 × 10 min bouts per day. The authors recommend office workers to perform daily neck- and shoulder resistance training to possibly prevent and/or decrease pain in the neck- and shoulder area. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN69968888, retrospectively registered (24/09/2019).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7110779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71107792020-04-07 Dose-response of resistance training for neck-and shoulder pain relief: a workplace intervention study Saeterbakken, Atle Hole Makrygiannis, Paula Stien, Nicolay Solstad, Tom Erik Jorung Shaw, Matthew Andersen, Vidar Pedersen, Helene BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders are highly prevalent among office workers, with strong evidence suggesting that workplace-based resistance training programs can prevent several upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of the present study was to examine the dose-response relationship between resistance training frequency and pain relief among office workers with neck- and shoulder pain. METHODS: Thirty participants with mild to moderate neck- and shoulder pain attended a 16-week intervention starting with an eight-week control period followed by an eight-week training period. After the control period, the participants were randomized into either a 10 min (TG10) or 2 × 10 min (TG2) workplace-based, high-intensity neck- and shoulder specific resistance training program that was executed 5 days per week and consisting of four exercises. The participants were tested pre and post each period for mean and worst pain using the 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), 0-100 mm health-related quality of life and isometric strength of the neck-and shoulder region. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Friedman with Bonferroni post hoc corrections were used to assess differences in between and within groups for the three testing times pre, mid and post intervention. RESULTS: No differences were observed between the groups in any of the variables in the control period (p = 0.27–0.97) or training period (p = 0.37–0.68). When merging the two groups, the mean and worst pain was reduced by 25 and 43% (p = 0.05 and < 0.01, ES = 0.41 and 0.55) in the training period in addition to 10.6% increase in health-related quality of life (p = 0.01, ES = 0.52). No difference in strength was observed (p = 0.29–0.85). CONCLUSION: Daily bouts of specific high-intensity resistance training of the shoulder and neck region at the workplace reduced neck- and shoulder pain and improved quality of life of office workers. However, 10 min bouts were equally effective as 2 × 10 min bouts per day. The authors recommend office workers to perform daily neck- and shoulder resistance training to possibly prevent and/or decrease pain in the neck- and shoulder area. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN69968888, retrospectively registered (24/09/2019). BioMed Central 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7110779/ /pubmed/32266072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-0158-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
Makrygiannis, Paula
Stien, Nicolay
Solstad, Tom Erik Jorung
Shaw, Matthew
Andersen, Vidar
Pedersen, Helene
Dose-response of resistance training for neck-and shoulder pain relief: a workplace intervention study
title Dose-response of resistance training for neck-and shoulder pain relief: a workplace intervention study
title_full Dose-response of resistance training for neck-and shoulder pain relief: a workplace intervention study
title_fullStr Dose-response of resistance training for neck-and shoulder pain relief: a workplace intervention study
title_full_unstemmed Dose-response of resistance training for neck-and shoulder pain relief: a workplace intervention study
title_short Dose-response of resistance training for neck-and shoulder pain relief: a workplace intervention study
title_sort dose-response of resistance training for neck-and shoulder pain relief: a workplace intervention study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7110779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-0158-0
work_keys_str_mv AT saeterbakkenatlehole doseresponseofresistancetrainingforneckandshoulderpainreliefaworkplaceinterventionstudy
AT makrygiannispaula doseresponseofresistancetrainingforneckandshoulderpainreliefaworkplaceinterventionstudy
AT stiennicolay doseresponseofresistancetrainingforneckandshoulderpainreliefaworkplaceinterventionstudy
AT solstadtomerikjorung doseresponseofresistancetrainingforneckandshoulderpainreliefaworkplaceinterventionstudy
AT shawmatthew doseresponseofresistancetrainingforneckandshoulderpainreliefaworkplaceinterventionstudy
AT andersenvidar doseresponseofresistancetrainingforneckandshoulderpainreliefaworkplaceinterventionstudy
AT pedersenhelene doseresponseofresistancetrainingforneckandshoulderpainreliefaworkplaceinterventionstudy