Cargando…
Donepezil plus memantine versus donepezil alone for treatment of concomitant Alzheimer’s disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective observational study
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical outcomes of donepezil plus memantine (DM) and donepezil (DO) alone in Asian patients with a concomitant diagnosis of moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease and mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AD-COPD). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7111061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520902895 |
_version_ | 1783513196396544000 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Yangyi Qian, Liang Yu, Weiguang Li, Tingting Mao, Shuai Han, Guowei |
author_facet | Cao, Yangyi Qian, Liang Yu, Weiguang Li, Tingting Mao, Shuai Han, Guowei |
author_sort | Cao, Yangyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical outcomes of donepezil plus memantine (DM) and donepezil (DO) alone in Asian patients with a concomitant diagnosis of moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease and mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AD-COPD). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with AD-COPD who received either DM or DO for 6 months, or until the occurrence of unacceptable adverse events or disease progression, between June 2012 and May 2016. The primary endpoint was the score on the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE). Secondary endpoints were scores on the caregiver-rated Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Dementia Quality of Life (DEMQOL)-Proxy, and General Health Questionnaire 12. RESULTS: In total, 154 eligible patients received DM, whereas 156 received DO. Compared with patients who received DO, patients who received DM had significantly higher mean scores on the SMMSE by 2.1 points (95% confidence interval, 1.3–2.5). Significant between-group heterogeneity was not detected in outcomes over time. The benefits of treatment with DM were greater than those of treatment with DO, in terms of the primary endpoint. Significant differences were also detected in terms of secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: DM is more effective than DO alone for Asian patients with AD-COPD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7111061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71110612020-04-09 Donepezil plus memantine versus donepezil alone for treatment of concomitant Alzheimer’s disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective observational study Cao, Yangyi Qian, Liang Yu, Weiguang Li, Tingting Mao, Shuai Han, Guowei J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical outcomes of donepezil plus memantine (DM) and donepezil (DO) alone in Asian patients with a concomitant diagnosis of moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease and mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AD-COPD). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with AD-COPD who received either DM or DO for 6 months, or until the occurrence of unacceptable adverse events or disease progression, between June 2012 and May 2016. The primary endpoint was the score on the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE). Secondary endpoints were scores on the caregiver-rated Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Dementia Quality of Life (DEMQOL)-Proxy, and General Health Questionnaire 12. RESULTS: In total, 154 eligible patients received DM, whereas 156 received DO. Compared with patients who received DO, patients who received DM had significantly higher mean scores on the SMMSE by 2.1 points (95% confidence interval, 1.3–2.5). Significant between-group heterogeneity was not detected in outcomes over time. The benefits of treatment with DM were greater than those of treatment with DO, in terms of the primary endpoint. Significant differences were also detected in terms of secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: DM is more effective than DO alone for Asian patients with AD-COPD. SAGE Publications 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7111061/ /pubmed/32046559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520902895 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Clinical Research Report Cao, Yangyi Qian, Liang Yu, Weiguang Li, Tingting Mao, Shuai Han, Guowei Donepezil plus memantine versus donepezil alone for treatment of concomitant Alzheimer’s disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective observational study |
title | Donepezil plus memantine versus donepezil alone for treatment of concomitant Alzheimer’s disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective observational study |
title_full | Donepezil plus memantine versus donepezil alone for treatment of concomitant Alzheimer’s disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective observational study |
title_fullStr | Donepezil plus memantine versus donepezil alone for treatment of concomitant Alzheimer’s disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Donepezil plus memantine versus donepezil alone for treatment of concomitant Alzheimer’s disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective observational study |
title_short | Donepezil plus memantine versus donepezil alone for treatment of concomitant Alzheimer’s disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective observational study |
title_sort | donepezil plus memantine versus donepezil alone for treatment of concomitant alzheimer’s disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective observational study |
topic | Retrospective Clinical Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7111061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520902895 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caoyangyi donepezilplusmemantineversusdonepezilalonefortreatmentofconcomitantalzheimersdiseaseandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy AT qianliang donepezilplusmemantineversusdonepezilalonefortreatmentofconcomitantalzheimersdiseaseandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy AT yuweiguang donepezilplusmemantineversusdonepezilalonefortreatmentofconcomitantalzheimersdiseaseandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy AT litingting donepezilplusmemantineversusdonepezilalonefortreatmentofconcomitantalzheimersdiseaseandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy AT maoshuai donepezilplusmemantineversusdonepezilalonefortreatmentofconcomitantalzheimersdiseaseandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy AT hanguowei donepezilplusmemantineversusdonepezilalonefortreatmentofconcomitantalzheimersdiseaseandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearetrospectiveobservationalstudy |